The post Ethereum Core Veteran: Vitalik Buterin Has ‘Complete Indirect Control’ Over Ecosystem appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Veteran Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has argued that Vitalik Buterin has effective control over the non-profit Ethereum Foundation. He claimed that a small number of people are dominating new investment and advisory roles. The CEO and founder of the Polygon Foundation also critiqued the Ethereum Foundation’s governance. Longtime Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has hit out at the Ethereum Foundation’s approach to governance in a recently shared mid-2024 memo to other Foundation leadership, accusing it of having a “ruling elite who will never relinquish control.” “Ethereum may be decentralised, but Vitalik absolutely has complete indirect control over it,” read the letter. The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is a non-profit that supports the Ethereum (ETH) ecosystem. Vitalik Buterin, who was one of Ethereum’s founders, is its most well-known advocate. Szilágyi has worked for the Foundation since 2015, shortly after the cryptocurrency launched. He led the Geth project, or Go Ethereum—the most popular software client used to run Ethereum nodes—with about 41% of the market share. He added that although he has “utmost respect for Vitalik,” the Ethereum founder is directly defining what becomes successful in the network’s ecosystem. “His attention, direction of research, brainpower, donations and investments absolutely define which projects succeed (at a very high probability),” Szilágyi wrote. “And his opinions absolutely define what’s permitted and what isn’t permitted in the ecosystem at large, so the key to gray-area behavior is to convince Vitalik it’s ok-ish.” He alleged that for projects to become supported by the Foundation, “you just need to get the correct 5–10 people around Vitalik” to commit.  The veteran developer claimed that the Foundation’s centralized approach has extended to how it approaches external investment. He says the Foundation has moved away from its original strategy of offering new projects for public investment, instead “reaching… The post Ethereum Core Veteran: Vitalik Buterin Has ‘Complete Indirect Control’ Over Ecosystem appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Veteran Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has argued that Vitalik Buterin has effective control over the non-profit Ethereum Foundation. He claimed that a small number of people are dominating new investment and advisory roles. The CEO and founder of the Polygon Foundation also critiqued the Ethereum Foundation’s governance. Longtime Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has hit out at the Ethereum Foundation’s approach to governance in a recently shared mid-2024 memo to other Foundation leadership, accusing it of having a “ruling elite who will never relinquish control.” “Ethereum may be decentralised, but Vitalik absolutely has complete indirect control over it,” read the letter. The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is a non-profit that supports the Ethereum (ETH) ecosystem. Vitalik Buterin, who was one of Ethereum’s founders, is its most well-known advocate. Szilágyi has worked for the Foundation since 2015, shortly after the cryptocurrency launched. He led the Geth project, or Go Ethereum—the most popular software client used to run Ethereum nodes—with about 41% of the market share. He added that although he has “utmost respect for Vitalik,” the Ethereum founder is directly defining what becomes successful in the network’s ecosystem. “His attention, direction of research, brainpower, donations and investments absolutely define which projects succeed (at a very high probability),” Szilágyi wrote. “And his opinions absolutely define what’s permitted and what isn’t permitted in the ecosystem at large, so the key to gray-area behavior is to convince Vitalik it’s ok-ish.” He alleged that for projects to become supported by the Foundation, “you just need to get the correct 5–10 people around Vitalik” to commit.  The veteran developer claimed that the Foundation’s centralized approach has extended to how it approaches external investment. He says the Foundation has moved away from its original strategy of offering new projects for public investment, instead “reaching…

Ethereum Core Veteran: Vitalik Buterin Has ‘Complete Indirect Control’ Over Ecosystem

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

In brief

  • Veteran Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has argued that Vitalik Buterin has effective control over the non-profit Ethereum Foundation.
  • He claimed that a small number of people are dominating new investment and advisory roles.
  • The CEO and founder of the Polygon Foundation also critiqued the Ethereum Foundation’s governance.

Longtime Ethereum Core Developer Péter Szilágyi has hit out at the Ethereum Foundation’s approach to governance in a recently shared mid-2024 memo to other Foundation leadership, accusing it of having a “ruling elite who will never relinquish control.”

“Ethereum may be decentralised, but Vitalik absolutely has complete indirect control over it,” read the letter.

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is a non-profit that supports the Ethereum (ETH) ecosystem. Vitalik Buterin, who was one of Ethereum’s founders, is its most well-known advocate.

Szilágyi has worked for the Foundation since 2015, shortly after the cryptocurrency launched. He led the Geth project, or Go Ethereum—the most popular software client used to run Ethereum nodes—with about 41% of the market share.

He added that although he has “utmost respect for Vitalik,” the Ethereum founder is directly defining what becomes successful in the network’s ecosystem.

“His attention, direction of research, brainpower, donations and investments absolutely define which projects succeed (at a very high probability),” Szilágyi wrote. “And his opinions absolutely define what’s permitted and what isn’t permitted in the ecosystem at large, so the key to gray-area behavior is to convince Vitalik it’s ok-ish.”

He alleged that for projects to become supported by the Foundation, “you just need to get the correct 5–10 people around Vitalik” to commit.

The veteran developer claimed that the Foundation’s centralized approach has extended to how it approaches external investment. He says the Foundation has moved away from its original strategy of offering new projects for public investment, instead “reaching out to the same 5–10 people for initial investment or advisory roles.”

“You find the same exact people behind all the new projects launching, each project directly playing into each other’s hands, and if you zoom out enough, you will also find the same VCs on the outside,” Szilágyi added.

Decrypt has reached out to the Ethereum Foundation and will update this article should we receive a response.

Polygon Founder jumps in

Sandeep Nailwal, CEO and founder of the Polygon Foundation, chimed in with a tweet, using Szilágyi’s comments as a springboard to vent his own frustrations about the Foundation and arguing that the Ethereum community “needs to take a hard look at itself.”

“Why does it feel like every other week, someone with major contributions to Ethereum has to publicly question what they’re even doing here?” he added.

Polygon (POL) is a Layer-2 network that uses Ethereum as its foundation.

Nailwal also criticized the Foundation’s decision not to grant his network official recognition as an L2—and the official security guarantees that would provide. Buterin later addressed the issue with his own tweet, stating that he appreciated the “immensely valuable role” Polygon plays in the Ethereum ecosystem.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Source: https://decrypt.co/345167/ethereum-core-veteran-vitalik-buterin-has-complete-indirect-control-over-ecosystem

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.0796
$0.0796$0.0796
-1.24%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement

The post Stablecoins firm as Mastercard enables stablecoin settlement appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. What Mastercard’s Crypto Partner Program is and how it
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 10:44
South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa launches HIV vaccine trial

South Africa HIV vaccine trial efforts are advancing after researchers launched the first locally developed HIV vaccine study on the continent.   South Africa expands
Share
Furtherafrica2026/03/12 09:30