The post ‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned. I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad. What’s going on here? A number of things: Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively. Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material. The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous… The post ‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned. I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad. What’s going on here? A number of things: Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively. Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material. The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous…

‘The Witcher’ Season 4 Fails To Debut At #1 On Netflix Amidst Awful Scores

Once upon a time, The Witcher seemed like it was going to be Netflix’s answer to Game of Thrones, a well-cast, well-formed adaptation of the books (and sometimes games) with a powerhouse trio playing Geralt, Yennefer and Ciri. Henry Cavill’s Geralt anchored the show, but now in season 4, after his departure, review scores have crashed, and interest in the show has visibly waned.

I’ll get to the scores in a minute, but the most shocking thing to me is that at release here, a show the size of The Witcher did not debut at #1 on Netflix’s Top 10 list, nor even #2, coming in at #3 behind romantic comedy Nobody Wants This, which debuted over a week ago, and the reality series Selling Sunset, back for season 9. That is bad.

What’s going on here? A number of things:

  • Season 4 isn’t great. Critics have rated it lower than all other Witcher seasons with a 56% on Rotten Tomatoes, down from the 68%, 95% and 79% of seasons 1-3, respectively.
  • Then we have the “review bombing” of audience scores, where season 4 has a dismal 18%, but a whole lot of that is a very real representation of how much previous fans of the series now hate the recasting of Cavill as Geralt, now played by Liam Hemsworth. Though to be fair, season 3, which still did have Cavill, got a 20% audience score, mostly from fans upset about departures from the source material.
  • The gap between seasons was too long. It’s been two years and four months since season 3 premiered, pushing its luck even among generally long gaps between seasons of shows in the streaming era. If you were already questioning whether the show was going to be any good after a recast and not-great previous seasons, you may not bother showing up at all. And this is a significant factor in The Witcher’s low placement on the list here.

A year ago, The Witcher was already renewed for season 5, which will finish the saga with Hemsworth’s Geralt. Netflix is pot-committed now, as if you’ve gone this deep, you can’t really just end at 80%, even if quality and interest are fading.

This show is just such a mess of missed opportunities. Cavill was perfectly cast as Geralt, but he could not save the series by himself. Book departures certainly didn’t help, but even if you haven’t read the books, it’s just…not a terribly good fantasy series. It’s miles away from those early seasons of Game of Thrones, and the best you can say is “well, at least it’s better than the Amazon Lord of the Rings show.” Sometimes, anyway.

I’d say this spells disaster for the show, but again, season 5 is coming, barring any sort of emergency brake pulled by Netflix. I won’t rule it out, but Netflix essentially has to see this through now.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram.

Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2025/10/31/the-witcher-season-4-fails-to-debut-at-1-on-netflix-amidst-awful-scores/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02474
$0.02474$0.02474
+5.50%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15
Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

Why Is Crypto Up Today? – January 14, 2026

The crypto market is up today, with the cryptocurrency market capitalisation rising by 3.6% to $3.33 trillion. At the time of writing, 95 of the top 100 coins have
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/14 20:04