The island research arm will sell a 97 BTC stash to fund laboratory work and convert a dormant asset. Local officials said tenerife bitcoin exposure is under scrutiny, prompting calls for clearer governance and disclosure.
The sale of 97 BTC, reportedly acquired in 2012, will be routed through a Spanish financial institution authorised by the Bank of Spain and the CNMV. ITER says proceeds will bankroll research including quantum technologies and blockchain work rather than speculative investing. Using a regulated intermediary aligns the transaction with AML and custody best practices.
Juan Jos Martnez, Tenerifes innovation councillor, emphasised the purchase served research objectives rather than market exposure.
In contrast, Harvard Management Company disclosed a roughly $116 million IBIT position, Brown University reported about $4.19 million, and the University of Austin announced a dedicated $5 million bitcoin fund.
That context places the ITER action within a wider discussion on university bitcoin investments and governance standards for public institutions.
El Dia report covered the councils plan and noted the sale will use an authorised financial intermediary. Updated: 06 November 2025.
The sale of the forgotten bitcoin stash is unlikely to materially move markets given its size relative to spot liquidity and institutional flows. Moreover, spot Bitcoin ETFs were greenlit in January 2024, after which large inflows increased market depth.
The reported example of institutional volume includes a $63.34 billion figure in ETF inflows for IBIT, which helps explain why a single 97 BTC sale has limited market impact.
For further flow breakdown, see BlackRock IBIT inflows.
Ultimately, the ITER move shows a pragmatic choice: monetise a research asset to reinvest in science, rather than hold a marketfacing position. That said, transparent disposal protocols and reporting are essential for public credibility.
Key Points:
The Institute of Technology and Renewable Energies clarified that the Bitcoin purchase was intended for blockchain research, not for long-term investment.
The council described the sale as a governance and funding initiative, rather than a speculative move.
Officials reaffirmed the project’s academic purpose when responding to questions from the public and media.
Public statements consistently emphasised research goals and transparency in how the asset was liquidated.


