Cayman Islands Grand Court grants injunction against Maple Finance over alleged breaches in lstBTC partnership with Core Foundation.Cayman Islands Grand Court grants injunction against Maple Finance over alleged breaches in lstBTC partnership with Core Foundation.

Core Foundation wins injunction against Maple Finance in Cayman Islands court

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has issued an injunction against Maple Finance entities for allegedly breaching a commercial agreement with Core Foundation on the development of lstBTC, a Core-powered liquid staked Bitcoin token.

According to a copy of the ruling delivered by the Honourable Justice Jalil Asif KC, published on October 30, Core Foundation raised legal queries about Maple’s supposed misuse of confidential information and potential violation of a 24-month exclusivity clause.

Core Foundation and Maple Finance formed a partnership in February to create lstBTC, a product that allows investors to earn a yield on Bitcoin while keeping their assets in the custody of licensed firms, such as BitGo, Copper, and Hex Trust. 

The collaboration was announced at the Consensus Hong Kong event, where the foundation claims it made “significant financial and technical investments” in Maple’s development, marketing, promotion, and subsidies.

Maple Finance held under $500 million AUM pre-partnership

At the time the partnership began, Maple Finance entities reportedly managed under $500 million in assets. Initial revenues and the early success of the Bitcoin Yield offering, which became lstBTC in April, contributed to over $150 million worth of BTC purchases via an early over-the-counter version of the yield product.

Core Foundation said all Bitcoin provided to Maple was held in fully bankruptcy-remote, segregated portfolios, ring-fenced from other liabilities or exposures to protect lenders from losses due to Maple’s other business activities. 

“We went to great lengths during the initial contracting process with Maple to ensure that Bitcoin lenders would not face adverse consequences due to the actions of Maple,” the foundation wrote in its statement on X Wednesday.

Moreover, the organization propounded that IstBTC had price protections via put options to hedge against CORE token volatility, and it was actively participating in these risk management measures.

During the end of H1 2025, Core Foundation alleges that Maple Finance began using confidential information and resources from the lstBTC partnership to develop syrupBTC, a competing product. 

According to its members, syrupBTC’s development breached the exclusivity clause and continued to leverage Core Foundation’s investments while pursuing a rival offering.

The injunction now bars Maple from launching syrupBTC or conducting transactions using CORE tokens without written consent from Core Foundation pending arbitration. The court determined that damages alone would not be sufficient to address the risk of Maple dealing in CORE tokens or gaining a head start with a competing product.

“We honored every put expiry for months, paying out millions of dollars, until Maple’s alleged material breaches, as we considered we were directly subsidizing a competitive product. At that point, we obtained an injunction and issued notices of termination of the underlying agreements,” Core Foundation noted.

Maple and Core Bitcoin holdings in question

Maple Finance indicated that it may need to declare an impairment to the value of millions of dollars against Bitcoin lenders in the Bitcoin Yield offering. Yet, Core Foundation believes Maple’s claims that it cannot return the Bitcoin to lenders are unfounded, given the funds were held in reputable custodians.

The foundation’s attorneys told the Cayman Island courts that Maple’s “impairment” shows how unplumbed its troubling business practices really are. 

“We had understood that the Bitcoin was held with reputable custodians. This is another example of concerning behavior and business practices by Maple, which led to Core Foundation taking action in the best interest of its community,” it continued.

In the belief that Maple is redirecting Core’s resources toward syrupBTC, the foundation is trying to stop investors from being “indirectly subsidized to support a rival product.” 

Court ruling cites arbitration requirements

In his ruling, Judge Jalil Asif KC said he was satisfied the injunction supports intended arbitration proceedings, which are to be held within the Cayman Islands. The court reiterated that the arbitration must commence within 28 days of the injunction order. 

According to the Cayman Island Honorable Justice, it is likely that arbitration requests will be served on Maple Finance at the same time as the injunction to comply with the timeline.

“I accept what is said in the Plaintiff’s skeleton argument that that provides the necessary jurisdictional hook for me to exercise my power to grant this injunction,” the judge wrote.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.1122
$0.1122$0.1122
-2.09%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37