The post Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insight: Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space. The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules. Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely. Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework. The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements. The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021. The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days. The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions. The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case. The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes. Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events The core… The post Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insight: Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space. The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules. Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely. Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework. The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements. The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021. The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days. The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average. Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions. The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case. The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes. Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events The core…

Crypto News: Analyst Calls 4-Year Cycle Strategy ‘Colossal Mistake’; Here’s Why

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Key Insight:

  • Dan Gambardello challenges the four-year cycle theory, sparking discussions in the crypto news space.
  • The market operates on liquidity cycles, not Bitcoin halving schedules.
  • Altcoins have decoupled from Bitcoin halving timing completely.

Crypto news continues to focus on market cycles as analyst Dan Gambardello released a detailed analysis challenging the traditional four-year cycle framework.

The crypto market expert argues that following this timing model could be a “colossal mistake” for investors. Gambardello’s thesis centers on liquidity cycles rather than halving events as the primary driver of crypto market movements.

The analysis comes as Bitcoin trades below key moving averages and the crypto prices face continued consolidation.

Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Theory Faces Scrutiny

Gambardello opened his analysis by examining technical indicators from previous bear markets. The 20-week moving average crossing below the 50-week moving average preceded major bottoms in 2014, 2018, and 2021.

The 2014 and 2018 bear markets both saw approximately 161 days from the moving average cross to the bottom. The 2021 bear market crypto news extended this timeline to 238 days.

The current crypto market structure shows that the 20-week moving average has not yet crossed below the 50-week moving average.

Crypto News: Four-Year Cycle Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X

If this cross occurs within one to two months and follows a similar 150-day decline pattern, Bitcoin would face around 200 total days of downside. Gambardello argues this scenario is unlikely based on macro conditions.

The analyst points to the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) as the overlooked factor. During the 2014, 2018, and 2021 bear markets, PMI was falling in each case.

The business cycle indicator has been contracting for a record period. Current data suggests this contraction is ending as quantitative tightening concludes.

Liquidity Cycles Drive Crypto Prices, Not Halving Events

The core argument in this crypto news analysis challenges the reason behind past bull markets.

Gambardello overlays historical price action with global liquidity expansions. The 2013, 2017, and 2020-21 bull markets all coincided with major liquidity expansion periods. Each of these expansions happened to align with Bitcoin halving events.

The analyst argues that the halving served as an overlay while liquidity was the crucial factor driving crypto prices higher. The supply shock from halvings remains real and contributes to long-term Bitcoin appreciation.

However, Gambardello mentioned the halving isn’t the ingredient creating crypto bull and bear markets. It functions as one fundamental tailwind inside much larger liquidity cycles.

Record-breaking PMI weakness occurred while the crypto market entered what many assumed would be a typical post-halving bull run.

Institutional Control Changes Crypto Market Dynamics

Gambardello cites commentary from analysts noting the rise of institutional control. The crypto market now behaves like an asset class rather than a retail experiment.

In other crypto news, exchange-traded funds exist for Bitcoin, with multiple altcoin ETF applications pending approval. Bitcoin trades with clear correlations to macro assets.

Altcoins follow liquidity cycles and institutional flows rather than halving schedules.

Crypto Market Four-Year Cycle | Source: Dan Gambardello

He also mentioned that flows have become algorithmic rather than emotional. Global liquidity drives price action across the crypto market.

Analyst Wilberforce noted on social media that institutional control may stretch the traditional four-year cycle into five years.

Every major rally in crypto history aligned with global liquidity expansions. Every stagnation or crash is aligned with liquidity tightening.

The halvings occurred during these periods, but didn’t drive the underlying price movements. Liquidity now flows into competing assets, including artificial intelligence stocks, equities, and technology sectors.

Altcoins Decouple from Bitcoin Halving Cycle

In other crypto news, Gambardello argues altcoins have officially broken away from Bitcoin halving schedules.

Altcoin cycles will now be driven by ETF demand, institutional rotations, on-chain activity, sector narratives, liquidity flows, AI adoption, layer-2 growth, and interoperability cycles.

Major assets, including Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Avalanche, no longer move on a Bitcoin halving clock.

The crypto market has entered a brand new game with entirely different dynamics than 2013, 2017, or even 2021. What replaces the four-year cycle is the first true liquidity cycle of the cryptocurrency era.

This cycle is driven by Federal Reserve balance sheet inflections, treasury cash flows, bond issuance cycles, repo market stress, PMI reversals, international liquidity from China and Japan, ETF flows, institutional rebalancing, and cross-asset liquidity correlations.

Analyst Hunter Horsley described the psychological element of cycle expectations. Investors believe in four-year cycles and sell in 2025, expecting a down year.

The contraction of the business cycle over recent years has created this mental element where investors sell, thinking the bear market is starting.

The halving clock no longer drives crypto prices. Liquidity cycles have replaced timing based on supply events as the primary market driver.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/11/20/crypto-news-analyst-calls-4-year-cycle-strategy-colossal-mistake-heres-why/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.007548
$0.007548$0.007548
+6.91%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Pump.fun (PUMP) Has Spiked by 200%: Can the Rally Survive?

Pump.fun (PUMP) Has Spiked by 200%: Can the Rally Survive?

Between July and now, the price of Pumpfun (PUMP) has spiked by more than 200%. The rally has been strong, and the sentiment is still high. However, do we expect to continue seeing these highs, or is the price showing signs of crashing already? We will consider this by taking insights from a video by
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:30
World Gold Council plans to build shared infrastructure platform for digital gold

World Gold Council plans to build shared infrastructure platform for digital gold

The post World Gold Council plans to build shared infrastructure platform for digital gold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The World Gold Council (WGC), a
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/20 14:45