The post Inside Strategy and MSTR’s index exclusion risk and what that means for Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is MSTR suddenly facing real exclusion risk? MSCI’s updated rules target companies whose balance sheets are dominated by Bitcoin, putting MSTR directly in the danger zone. How big could the impact be if MSTR is removed? JPMorgan estimates $2.8 billion in forced passive outflows from MSCI alone. And, up to $8.8 billion+ if other index providers follow. The Treasury market is waking up to a reality check. Volatility has spiked since Q4 kicked off, and investors are noticing their algorithms aren’t holding up, leaving many stakeholders deep underwater. Strategy [MSTR] hasn’t escaped the pain either. After back-to-back down quarters, the stock is down nearly 70% to $177, back to Q4 2024 levels, while Bitcoin [BTC] only lost about 21% in the same stretch. JP Morgan analysts are now flagging a potential risk –  MSTR could be excluded from the upcoming Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) review in January. The question is, is this a classic “sell-the-news” event? MSTR’s valuation loop falters at the worst possible time MSTR’s underlying engine is starting to show cracks.  From a technical standpoint, MSTR has lost 40% in just the last month and is down 68% from its ATH. The company currently holds 649,870 Bitcoin at an average cost of $74,433 per coin – A massive exposure. Technically, that means if BTC drops another 8% off the $80k-level, the company’s position would move fully into the red. That pressure has hit the stock and its premium hard, making $160 a solid floor for MSTR. Source: TradingView (MSTR/USDT) Notably, this is exactly why JP Morgan’s thesis matters.  MicroStrategy’s old playbook was simple – Raise money from the stock, buy BTC, the stock goes up, and repeat. However, that loop is now broken. When the stock trades near its BTC value, there’s no premium… The post Inside Strategy and MSTR’s index exclusion risk and what that means for Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Why is MSTR suddenly facing real exclusion risk? MSCI’s updated rules target companies whose balance sheets are dominated by Bitcoin, putting MSTR directly in the danger zone. How big could the impact be if MSTR is removed? JPMorgan estimates $2.8 billion in forced passive outflows from MSCI alone. And, up to $8.8 billion+ if other index providers follow. The Treasury market is waking up to a reality check. Volatility has spiked since Q4 kicked off, and investors are noticing their algorithms aren’t holding up, leaving many stakeholders deep underwater. Strategy [MSTR] hasn’t escaped the pain either. After back-to-back down quarters, the stock is down nearly 70% to $177, back to Q4 2024 levels, while Bitcoin [BTC] only lost about 21% in the same stretch. JP Morgan analysts are now flagging a potential risk –  MSTR could be excluded from the upcoming Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) review in January. The question is, is this a classic “sell-the-news” event? MSTR’s valuation loop falters at the worst possible time MSTR’s underlying engine is starting to show cracks.  From a technical standpoint, MSTR has lost 40% in just the last month and is down 68% from its ATH. The company currently holds 649,870 Bitcoin at an average cost of $74,433 per coin – A massive exposure. Technically, that means if BTC drops another 8% off the $80k-level, the company’s position would move fully into the red. That pressure has hit the stock and its premium hard, making $160 a solid floor for MSTR. Source: TradingView (MSTR/USDT) Notably, this is exactly why JP Morgan’s thesis matters.  MicroStrategy’s old playbook was simple – Raise money from the stock, buy BTC, the stock goes up, and repeat. However, that loop is now broken. When the stock trades near its BTC value, there’s no premium…

Inside Strategy and MSTR’s index exclusion risk and what that means for Bitcoin

Key Takeaways

Why is MSTR suddenly facing real exclusion risk?

MSCI’s updated rules target companies whose balance sheets are dominated by Bitcoin, putting MSTR directly in the danger zone.

How big could the impact be if MSTR is removed?

JPMorgan estimates $2.8 billion in forced passive outflows from MSCI alone. And, up to $8.8 billion+ if other index providers follow.


The Treasury market is waking up to a reality check. Volatility has spiked since Q4 kicked off, and investors are noticing their algorithms aren’t holding up, leaving many stakeholders deep underwater.

Strategy [MSTR] hasn’t escaped the pain either. After back-to-back down quarters, the stock is down nearly 70% to $177, back to Q4 2024 levels, while Bitcoin [BTC] only lost about 21% in the same stretch.

JP Morgan analysts are now flagging a potential risk –  MSTR could be excluded from the upcoming Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) review in January. The question is, is this a classic “sell-the-news” event?

MSTR’s valuation loop falters at the worst possible time

MSTR’s underlying engine is starting to show cracks. 

From a technical standpoint, MSTR has lost 40% in just the last month and is down 68% from its ATH. The company currently holds 649,870 Bitcoin at an average cost of $74,433 per coin – A massive exposure.

Technically, that means if BTC drops another 8% off the $80k-level, the company’s position would move fully into the red. That pressure has hit the stock and its premium hard, making $160 a solid floor for MSTR.

Source: TradingView (MSTR/USDT)

Notably, this is exactly why JP Morgan’s thesis matters. 

MicroStrategy’s old playbook was simple – Raise money from the stock, buy BTC, the stock goes up, and repeat. However, that loop is now broken. When the stock trades near its BTC value, there’s no premium left to fund buying.

For example, if MSTR’s BTC/share is worth $150 and the stock trades at $300, the company can sell shares and buy BTC. However, if the stock is trading closer to $150, there’s no premium left. So, the cycle stops.

With that in mind, MSTR’s possible exclusion from MSCI doesn’t feel hypothetical anymore. And, with the decision less than two months away, what exactly are analysts expecting from this high-risk event?

Massive outflows loom as Microstrategy faces index risk

MSCI’s new criteria for DATs puts MSTR directly in the spotlight. 

MSCI has indicated that firms whose Bitcoin holdings dominate their balance sheets could be re-classified. In a more severe scenario, they could even be removed from major indices altogether.

And, the market is already pricing that in. As mentioned above, MSTR’s valuation premium has been shrinking fast. That’s only added to investor concerns, keeping the stock at risk of sliding down towards the $160-level.

Source: X (Matthew Sigel)

The bigger issue? Bloomberg reported that JPMorgan estimates $2.8 billion in passive flows would be forced to sell if MSCI removes MSTR. And, if other indexes mirror this move, the total outflows could climb to $8.8 billion+.

In short, MSTR is at a real inflection point. 

The company is still adding BTC using debt. However, in a risk-off market that strategy is starting to look increasingly exposed. That’s why a full MSCI exclusion in January is no longer just a headline. Instead, it’s a legitimate risk on the table.

Previous: Tensor (TNSR) crypto up by 445% as crypto market bleeds, but will it last?
Next: Bitcoin – THIS metric could save ‘weak’ market structure after BTC hits $85K!

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/inside-strategy-and-mstrs-index-exclusion-risk-and-what-that-means-for-bitcoin/

Market Opportunity
Index Cooperative Logo
Index Cooperative Price(INDEX)
$0.5366
$0.5366$0.5366
+5.79%
USD
Index Cooperative (INDEX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23

Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23

The post Saudi Awwal Bank Adopts Chainlink Tools, LINK Near $23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SAB adopts Chainlink’s CCIP and CRE to expand tokenization and cross-border finance tools. SAB and Wamid target $2.32T Saudi capital markets with blockchain-based tokenization plans. LINK price falls 2.43% to $22.99 despite higher trading volume and steady liquidity ratios. Saudi Awwal Bank has added Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and the Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) to its digital strategy. CCIP links assets and data across multiple blockchains, while CRE provides banks with a controlled framework to test and deploy new financial applications. The lender, with more than $100 billion in assets, is applying the tools to tokenized assets, cross-border settlement, and automated credit platforms. The move signals that Chainlink’s infrastructure is being adopted at scale inside regulated finance. Related: Chainlink’s Deal with SBI Is a Major Win, But Chart Shows LINK’s Battle at $27 Resistance Wamid Partnership Aims at $2.32 Trillion Markets In parallel, SAB signed an agreement with Wamid, a subsidiary of the Saudi Tadawul Group, to pilot tokenization of the Saudi Exchange’s $2.32 trillion capital markets. The focus is on equities and debt products, opening the door for blockchain-based issuance and settlement. SAB has already executed the world’s first Islamic repo on distributed ledger technology, in collaboration with Oumla earlier this year. That transaction gave regulators a template for compliant on-chain contracts. The Wamid deal builds directly on that precedent, shifting from single-instrument pilots toward broader capital markets integration. Saudi Blockchain Buildout Gains Pace Saudi institutions are building multiple layers of digital infrastructure. Oumla is working with Avalanche to develop the Kingdom’s first domestically hosted Layer 1 blockchain. SAB’s Chainlink adoption adds an interoperability and execution layer on top. Together, these projects are shaping a domestic framework for tokenization, with global connectivity added only where liquidity requires it. LINK Price and Liquidity Snapshot While institutional adoption progresses, Chainlink’s…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:49
Pump.fun CEO to Call Low-Cap Gem to Test New ‘Callouts’ Feature — Is a 100x Incoming?

Pump.fun CEO to Call Low-Cap Gem to Test New ‘Callouts’ Feature — Is a 100x Incoming?

Pump.fun has rolled out a new social feature that is already stirring debate across Solana’s meme coin scene, after founder Alon Cohen said he would personally
Share
CryptoNews2026/01/16 06:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49