TLDR SEC Commissioner Peirce never supported the Ripple lawsuit, expressing discomfort with enforcement-driven actions. Peirce clarifies that a token’s security status depends on how it is sold, not the token itself. Judge Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case clarifies the legal status of XRP in secondary markets. Peirce believes the Ripple case will shape future [...] The post SEC’s Peirce Reveals She Did Not Support the Ripple Lawsuit Decision appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR SEC Commissioner Peirce never supported the Ripple lawsuit, expressing discomfort with enforcement-driven actions. Peirce clarifies that a token’s security status depends on how it is sold, not the token itself. Judge Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case clarifies the legal status of XRP in secondary markets. Peirce believes the Ripple case will shape future [...] The post SEC’s Peirce Reveals She Did Not Support the Ripple Lawsuit Decision appeared first on CoinCentral.

SEC’s Peirce Reveals She Did Not Support the Ripple Lawsuit Decision

TLDR

  • SEC Commissioner Peirce never supported the Ripple lawsuit, expressing discomfort with enforcement-driven actions.
  • Peirce clarifies that a token’s security status depends on how it is sold, not the token itself.
  • Judge Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case clarifies the legal status of XRP in secondary markets.
  • Peirce believes the Ripple case will shape future regulatory frameworks for digital assets.

In a recent interview with Thinking Crypto, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce spoke candidly about the Ripple lawsuit and her opposition to the case. The SEC’s case against Ripple Labs, filed in December 2020, accused the company of offering unregistered securities through the sale of XRP tokens.

This lawsuit became a defining moment for the digital asset industry and led to extensive debates over how cryptocurrency and blockchain technology should be regulated.

Peirce, who has long advocated for a more balanced and transparent regulatory approach, emphasized that she did not support the SEC’s decision to bring the case. “I cannot speak for the agency’s full reasoning,” she explained, adding that her stance was in stark contrast to the enforcement-driven approach that characterized much of the SEC’s strategy at the time.

The lawsuit aimed to address what the SEC saw as violations of securities laws, but Peirce’s discomfort with such enforcement actions has been a consistent theme throughout her tenure.

The Ripple Case and Enforcement vs. Regulation

Peirce described the SEC’s decision to pursue Ripple as part of a broader enforcement-driven approach that she felt was misguided. According to her, this approach was not the best way to foster growth and innovation within the crypto space.

She believes that the SEC should have taken a more constructive role by helping companies understand and navigate the regulatory landscape, rather than resorting to litigation.

As Peirce sees it, the SEC could have worked alongside the digital asset industry to create clearer guidelines and standards that would have fostered better disclosures from companies. This would have been a more effective way to encourage innovation while ensuring compliance with relevant laws. “We could have had more constructive conversations to help projects understand the regulatory framework,” Peirce said.

The Ripple Case Ruling: Token vs. Transaction

In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres delivered a key ruling in the Ripple case, which found that XRP is not a security when traded on secondary markets. However, the court also determined that certain sales of XRP by Ripple were subject to securities laws. This decision added nuance to the legal landscape for digital assets, particularly regarding the distinction between a token and a transaction.

Peirce highlighted the importance of the ruling, stating that it reinforced the notion that a token itself is not inherently a security. “It’s the way the token is sold and the expectations surrounding its sale that determine its legal status,” Peirce explained. This ruling has set a precedent that emphasizes the transaction structure over the asset itself, marking a shift in how digital assets may be regulated in the future.

The Ripple Case and Future Regulatory Frameworks

The ruling in the Ripple case has forced both the SEC and Congress to reconsider their approach to digital asset regulation. Peirce noted that the decision will have a lasting impact on how digital asset frameworks are developed in the future. With discussions about new legislative measures such as the Clarity Act, she believes that this case will help shape more comprehensive regulations for the cryptocurrency market.

Peirce emphasized that the Ripple case’s ruling should prompt lawmakers and regulators to think more carefully about how digital assets should be treated under U.S. securities laws. The SEC, according to Peirce, should not rely solely on enforcement actions but should take a proactive role in setting clearer rules for digital assets.

The post SEC’s Peirce Reveals She Did Not Support the Ripple Lawsuit Decision appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0006095
$0.0006095$0.0006095
-6.81%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.