The South Korea financial watchdog is preparing a fresh round of penalties for domestic virtual asset exchanges, stepping up its campaign against antiThe South Korea financial watchdog is preparing a fresh round of penalties for domestic virtual asset exchanges, stepping up its campaign against anti

South Korea Set To Sanction Crypto Exchanges Over AML Failures

The South Korea financial watchdog is preparing a fresh round of penalties for domestic virtual asset exchanges, stepping up its campaign against anti-money laundering failures that regulators say threaten the integrity of the country’s fast-growing crypto market.

Financial authorities are expected to issue both institutional and individual sanctions, along with fines, against major trading platforms that breached anti-money laundering obligations, according to a local report published Monday.

The Korea Financial Intelligence Unit, or FIU, is moving through cases in the order of its on-site inspections, effectively using a first-in, first-out approach.

FIU Preparing Sanctions After Completing Major Exchange Inspections

The report said that the FIU plans to sanction the remaining large exchanges after already acting against Dunamu, the operator of Upbit. Since last year, the unit has carried out inspections at Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and GOPAX to check compliance with rules such as Know Your Customer checks and the reporting of suspicious transactions.

Most fieldwork is now complete, and legal reviews and sanctions committees are underway.

Since the FIU is following the sequence of its inspections, markets expect decisions to land in roughly the same order as visits were made. Dunamu was inspected in August last year, followed by Korbit in October, GOPAX in December, Bithumb in March this year and Coinone in April.

Bithumb could be pushed back in the queue after an additional on-site review of its order book operations.

Sanctions Expected To Follow Dunamu Precedent With Similar Penalties Ahead

The process will mirror the Dunamu case, where officials first decided on personal and institutional sanctions, then confirmed the size of the fine. In February, the FIU issued a disciplinary warning to Dunamu’s chief executive and slapped the exchange with a three-month suspension on new customer deposits and withdrawals for breaches of the Special Financial Transactions Act.

On Nov. 6, it added a fine of 35.2b won.

Industry participants expect similar findings across the remaining exchanges, given that inspectors examined broadly the same anti-money laundering controls.

Regulators are expected to announce further institutional and personnel sanctions, alongside sizable monetary penalties. Officials and market observers have signalled that total fines across the group could reach into the hundreds of billions of won, although the final amounts will depend on the number and seriousness of violations at each platform.

Crypto Markets Face Stricter Oversight While Korea’s Sanctions Process Continues

With four exchanges still awaiting decisions, the FIU is unlikely to finish its sanctions calendar this year. Most of the remaining actions are expected to be wrapped up by the first half of next year, keeping regulatory pressure elevated over a period when global crypto markets are already adjusting to stricter oversight.

The enforcement drive comes as South Korea faces renewed uncertainty over its long-delayed crypto tax regime. Officials have warned that the country is still far from ready to start taxing virtual assets by the scheduled Jan. 2027 date, citing gaps in infrastructure and detailed guidance.

After five years of political debate, technical planning and repeated postponements, talk of a fourth delay has returned to the agenda.

In parallel, policymakers are trying to show they are still open to innovation. The ruling Democratic Party recently launched a new crypto policy task force that it says will “foster growth” in digital assets and blockchain.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Digitap Raises Over $4M: A Comparison with DeepSnitch AI

Both DeepSnitch AI and Digitap ($TAP) have been highlighted within some crypto communities for their distinct approaches. Although the two coins take a very different
Share
Crypto Ninjas2026/01/18 23:42
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

The Economics of Self-Isolation: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Contagion in a Free Economy

Exploring how the costs of a pandemic can lead to a self-enforcing lockdown in a networked economy, analyzing the resulting changes in network structure and the existence of stable equilibria.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:00