The post Bitcoin ETFs shed $58B, dropping faster than BTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Although both bitcoin (BTC) and its US ETFs have declined over the past eight weeks, ETF outflows have further amplified these losses. After peaking at $168 billion on October 7, the top 12 bitcoin ETFs trading on US exchanges had lost 35% of their assets under management (AUM) by November 19 — far worse than BTC’s 28% decline over the same period. Of course, investors can blame BTC itself for most — but not all — of that $58 billion loss. From its October 7 all-time high of $126,300 to its $91,500 close on November 19, BTC itself declined 28%.  ETF fund outflows explain those extra 700 basis points, i.e. the 35% decline in AUM versus the 28% decline in BTC. Indeed, net flows from BTC ETFs have been negative for 21 of the past 35 trading days. Although spot ETF sponsors must keep shares of their funds tracking the price of BTC, minus pre-disclosed fees, their overall assets (with commensurate adjustments to share counts) can grow or shrink depending on how investors move assets between Blackrock, Grayscale, Fidelity, or other products. Protos has compiled a chart to illustrate the outsized outflows from US BTC ETFs, using data from Bitcoin ETF Fund Flows. Although changes in AUM at BTC ETFs often have a lead or lag time relative to the price of BTC, the chart illustrates the overall losses in AUM far exceed the price impact of BTC itself. AUM has declined 35% versus BTC’s 28% drop. Read more: Community Notes debunks spot bitcoin ETF rehypothecation To be clear, investors pull their assets out of ETFs by selling or redeeming, and these actions aren’t attributable to the sponsor. Simplistically, many social media users blamed Blackrock itself for selling BTC over the past eight weeks.  In fact, those sales originated from… The post Bitcoin ETFs shed $58B, dropping faster than BTC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Although both bitcoin (BTC) and its US ETFs have declined over the past eight weeks, ETF outflows have further amplified these losses. After peaking at $168 billion on October 7, the top 12 bitcoin ETFs trading on US exchanges had lost 35% of their assets under management (AUM) by November 19 — far worse than BTC’s 28% decline over the same period. Of course, investors can blame BTC itself for most — but not all — of that $58 billion loss. From its October 7 all-time high of $126,300 to its $91,500 close on November 19, BTC itself declined 28%.  ETF fund outflows explain those extra 700 basis points, i.e. the 35% decline in AUM versus the 28% decline in BTC. Indeed, net flows from BTC ETFs have been negative for 21 of the past 35 trading days. Although spot ETF sponsors must keep shares of their funds tracking the price of BTC, minus pre-disclosed fees, their overall assets (with commensurate adjustments to share counts) can grow or shrink depending on how investors move assets between Blackrock, Grayscale, Fidelity, or other products. Protos has compiled a chart to illustrate the outsized outflows from US BTC ETFs, using data from Bitcoin ETF Fund Flows. Although changes in AUM at BTC ETFs often have a lead or lag time relative to the price of BTC, the chart illustrates the overall losses in AUM far exceed the price impact of BTC itself. AUM has declined 35% versus BTC’s 28% drop. Read more: Community Notes debunks spot bitcoin ETF rehypothecation To be clear, investors pull their assets out of ETFs by selling or redeeming, and these actions aren’t attributable to the sponsor. Simplistically, many social media users blamed Blackrock itself for selling BTC over the past eight weeks.  In fact, those sales originated from…

Bitcoin ETFs shed $58B, dropping faster than BTC

Although both bitcoin (BTC) and its US ETFs have declined over the past eight weeks, ETF outflows have further amplified these losses.

After peaking at $168 billion on October 7, the top 12 bitcoin ETFs trading on US exchanges had lost 35% of their assets under management (AUM) by November 19 — far worse than BTC’s 28% decline over the same period.

Of course, investors can blame BTC itself for most — but not all — of that $58 billion loss. From its October 7 all-time high of $126,300 to its $91,500 close on November 19, BTC itself declined 28%. 

ETF fund outflows explain those extra 700 basis points, i.e. the 35% decline in AUM versus the 28% decline in BTC. Indeed, net flows from BTC ETFs have been negative for 21 of the past 35 trading days.

Although spot ETF sponsors must keep shares of their funds tracking the price of BTC, minus pre-disclosed fees, their overall assets (with commensurate adjustments to share counts) can grow or shrink depending on how investors move assets between Blackrock, Grayscale, Fidelity, or other products.

Protos has compiled a chart to illustrate the outsized outflows from US BTC ETFs, using data from Bitcoin ETF Fund Flows.

Although changes in AUM at BTC ETFs often have a lead or lag time relative to the price of BTC, the chart illustrates the overall losses in AUM far exceed the price impact of BTC itself.

AUM has declined 35% versus BTC’s 28% drop.

Read more: Community Notes debunks spot bitcoin ETF rehypothecation

To be clear, investors pull their assets out of ETFs by selling or redeeming, and these actions aren’t attributable to the sponsor.

Simplistically, many social media users blamed Blackrock itself for selling BTC over the past eight weeks. 

In fact, those sales originated from thousands of investors who owned Blackrock’s IBIT ETF via hundreds of third-party brokerages and funds. Blackrock never placed those sell orders.

Similarly misplaced anger circulated against other ETF sponsors like Grayscale and Bitwise that, to be clear, didn’t originate the alleged selling pressure against BTC.

Unless a separate division at the same company is trading with corporate funds, most ETF sponsors merely follow their customers’ instructions.

The charts and screenshots attached to these social media posts simply showed the results of customers’ orders — not corporate trading.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/chart-bitcoin-etfs-shed-58b-dropping-faster-than-btc/

Market Opportunity
Archer Hunter Logo
Archer Hunter Price(FASTER)
$0.0000599
$0.0000599$0.0000599
-9.24%
USD
Archer Hunter (FASTER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment?

The post Is Doge Losing Steam As Traders Choose Pepeto For The Best Crypto Investment? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 17:39 Is dogecoin really fading? As traders hunt the best crypto to buy now and weigh 2025 picks, Dogecoin (DOGE) still owns the meme coin spotlight, yet upside looks capped, today’s Dogecoin price prediction says as much. Attention is shifting to projects that blend culture with real on-chain tools. Buyers searching “best crypto to buy now” want shipped products, audits, and transparent tokenomics. That frames the true matchup: dogecoin vs. Pepeto. Enter Pepeto (PEPETO), an Ethereum-based memecoin with working rails: PepetoSwap, a zero-fee DEX, plus Pepeto Bridge for smooth cross-chain moves. By fusing story with tools people can use now, and speaking directly to crypto presale 2025 demand, Pepeto puts utility, clarity, and distribution in front. In a market where legacy meme coin leaders risk drifting on sentiment, Pepeto’s execution gives it a real seat in the “best crypto to buy now” debate. First, a quick look at why dogecoin may be losing altitude. Dogecoin Price Prediction: Is Doge Really Fading? Remember when dogecoin made crypto feel simple? In 2013, DOGE turned a meme into money and a loose forum into a movement. A decade on, the nonstop momentum has cooled; the backdrop is different, and the market is far more selective. With DOGE circling ~$0.268, the tape reads bearish-to-neutral for the next few weeks: hold the $0.26 shelf on daily closes and expect choppy range-trading toward $0.29–$0.30 where rallies keep stalling; lose $0.26 decisively and momentum often bleeds into $0.245 with risk of a deeper probe toward $0.22–$0.21; reclaim $0.30 on a clean daily close and the downside bias is likely neutralized, opening room for a squeeze into the low-$0.30s. Source: CoinMarketcap / TradingView Beyond the dogecoin price prediction, DOGE still centers on payments and lacks native smart contracts; ZK-proof verification is proposed,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:14
Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum

Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum

The post Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Vitalik Buterin supports ZK Rollups for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/19 15:43
NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026

NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026

The post NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rebeca Moen
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/19 15:34