TLDR: South Korea debates stablecoin rules, with banks pushing for control. Bank of Korea insists banks must lead stablecoin issuance. Tech giants like Naver advance stablecoin projects despite delays. Regulatory standoff delays South Korea’s stablecoin framework rollout. South Korea lawmakers review bills for stablecoin regulation amid debate. South Korea is facing challenges in finalizing its [...] The post South Korea Faces Roadblocks in Stablecoin Regulation appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR: South Korea debates stablecoin rules, with banks pushing for control. Bank of Korea insists banks must lead stablecoin issuance. Tech giants like Naver advance stablecoin projects despite delays. Regulatory standoff delays South Korea’s stablecoin framework rollout. South Korea lawmakers review bills for stablecoin regulation amid debate. South Korea is facing challenges in finalizing its [...] The post South Korea Faces Roadblocks in Stablecoin Regulation appeared first on CoinCentral.

South Korea Faces Roadblocks in Stablecoin Regulation

TLDR:

  • South Korea debates stablecoin rules, with banks pushing for control.
  • Bank of Korea insists banks must lead stablecoin issuance.
  • Tech giants like Naver advance stablecoin projects despite delays.
  • Regulatory standoff delays South Korea’s stablecoin framework rollout.
  • South Korea lawmakers review bills for stablecoin regulation amid debate.

South Korea is facing challenges in finalizing its regulatory framework for locally issued stablecoins. The country’s central bank, the Bank of Korea (BOK), and financial regulators have reached a standstill over the role of banks in stablecoin issuance. The dispute has led to delays in the expected rollout of a stablecoin regulatory framework, which was anticipated to be introduced by the end of  2025.

BOK’s Stance on Bank Involvement

The Bank of Korea (BOK) insists that any stablecoin issuer should be majority-owned by a consortium of banks. According to the BOK, banks should own at least 51% of the issuer to secure regulatory approval. The central bank argues that this structure will mitigate financial risks and ensure compliance with anti-money laundering protocols.

The BOK’s position stems from its concerns over financial and foreign exchange stability. It believes that only banks, with their regulatory oversight and experience, can adequately handle the potential risks of stablecoins. Moreover, the BOK has cautioned against allowing non-bank entities to lead stablecoin issuance, suggesting that such a move could undermine existing financial regulations.

Disagreements Over Non-Bank Participation

While the Bank of Korea holds firm on its position, other regulators are open to a more inclusive approach. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) has shown a willingness to allow a broader range of industry players to participate in stablecoin issuance. This includes technology firms, which have increasingly shown interest in the stablecoin market.

Some experts argue that allowing tech companies to issue stablecoins could foster innovation and competition. However, concerns about potential monopolies and the concentration of financial power in non-bank entities remain a key issue. The debate continues as the country works to establish a clear and balanced regulatory framework.

Three Bills Under Review by South Korean Lawmakers

South Korean lawmakers are currently reviewing three separate bills aimed at regulating stablecoin issuance. These bills were submitted by both the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) and the opposition People Power Party (PPP). Each bill proposes a minimum capital requirement of 5 billion won ($3.4 million) for stablecoin issuers.

Key areas of disagreement remain. One significant point of contention is whether stablecoin issuers should be permitted to offer interest on holdings. Some bills, such as those from the DPK, advocate for allowing interest payments, while others seek to prohibit them, citing concerns about the impact on financial stability.

Despite these disagreements, progress continues in the National Assembly, with lawmakers aiming to address these contentious issues in the coming months. As the bills are reviewed, the future of stablecoin regulation in South Korea hangs in the balance.

Tech Giants Push Ahead with Stablecoin Initiatives

In the midst of regulatory uncertainty, South Korean tech giants are moving ahead with their stablecoin projects. Naver, one of the country’s largest tech firms, is preparing to launch a stablecoin wallet in collaboration with Hashed and the Busan Digital Exchange. The initiative highlights the growing interest in stablecoins and the need for clearer regulatory guidance.

Additionally, a potential merger between Naver Financial and Dunamu, the operator of the Upbit exchange, could further accelerate the development of stablecoin-related services in South Korea. As regulatory discussions continue, these companies are positioning themselves to lead the charge in the stablecoin space.

South Korea’s regulatory framework for stablecoins remains in limbo as the central bank and other regulators continue to debate the role of banks and non-bank entities. With lawmakers reviewing several bills, the future of stablecoin regulation in South Korea is far from settled.

The post South Korea Faces Roadblocks in Stablecoin Regulation appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03634
$0.03634$0.03634
-2.54%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55
Turmoil Strikes Theta Labs with New Legal Allegations

Turmoil Strikes Theta Labs with New Legal Allegations

Cryptocurrency often sees its fair share of lawsuits, with many concluding without much ado. However, a fresh legal battle has surfaced involving a well-known altcoin
Share
Coinstats2025/12/17 03:06