2025 marks a turning point for artificial intelligence in finance. After a year of conversations dominated by consumer chatbots, the talk has now shifted to whether industrial-grade AI can withstand regulatory scrutiny, operate within risk frameworks, and survive a compliance audit. This shift is captured clearly in the HKMA GenAI Sandbox report, developed with Cyberport, which [...] The post Banks Can Slash Production Time by Up to 60% with GenAI, HKMA Report Reveals appeared first on Fintech Hong Kong.2025 marks a turning point for artificial intelligence in finance. After a year of conversations dominated by consumer chatbots, the talk has now shifted to whether industrial-grade AI can withstand regulatory scrutiny, operate within risk frameworks, and survive a compliance audit. This shift is captured clearly in the HKMA GenAI Sandbox report, developed with Cyberport, which [...] The post Banks Can Slash Production Time by Up to 60% with GenAI, HKMA Report Reveals appeared first on Fintech Hong Kong.

Banks Can Slash Production Time by Up to 60% with GenAI, HKMA Report Reveals

2025 marks a turning point for artificial intelligence in finance. After a year of conversations dominated by consumer chatbots, the talk has now shifted to whether industrial-grade AI can withstand regulatory scrutiny, operate within risk frameworks, and survive a compliance audit.

This shift is captured clearly in the HKMA GenAI Sandbox report, developed with Cyberport, which offers possibly one of the most structured and transparent examinations of how banks are pushing to deploy GenAI today.

Rather than asking what a model can generate, it focuses on whether a model can be trusted, validated, governed, and deployed safely across high-stakes workflows.

The HKMA GenAI sandbox experimented with GenAI capabilities across three critical domains: risk management, anti-fraud, and customer experience.

HKMA GenAI reportSource: HKMA

Key Considerations in Evaluating GenAI Sandbox Applications

To determine which proposals made the cut in the HKMA GenAI sandbox, four strategic factors guided the prioritisation process.

hkma genai sandbox reportSource: HKMA

First, evaluators looked for a high level of innovation, specifically targeting solutions that introduced novel ideas or methodologies capable of unlocking new digitalisation opportunities.

Next, this was balanced against the complexity of the solutions, ensuring that proposals demonstrated the technical sophistication and intricacy necessary to drive genuine advancement and add value.

Proposals needed to show a significant expected contribution to the industry, like addressing sector-wide challenges through applications that are replicable and scalable.

Finally, the selection process required strict adherence to the principle of fair use. This ensured that the sandbox’s pooled computing resources would be used in a responsible, efficient, and equitable manner.

Since the sandbox operates on shared infrastructure, this particular criterion assesses whether the solution is engineered to be efficient, ensuring it doesn’t monopolise computing power at the expense of other participants.

How Data Strategy and Preparation Affect GenAI Model Development

It goes without saying that the performance and reliability of GenAI solutions depend on the data they are trained or fine-tuned on.
Testing data are equally critical for rigorously testing the accuracy and contextual relevance of the model’s outputs.
It often can consume as much, if not more, time and resources than the fine-tuning of the model solution itself.
genai data strategy and preparationSource: HKMA

Data Collection

To ensure datasets were inclusive and dependable, HKMA GenAI sandbox participants used a mix of independent public and proprietary sources. These datasets were curated to cover critical dimensions such as product lines, languages, and customer personas.

This approach captured the website’s information completely without human intervention, and it preserved a highly accurate copy of the site’s content.

Data Pre-processing

Once datasets were collected, they required pre-processing before being used to improve data quality and protect privacy.

To maintain consistency and support efficient fine-tuning, banks carried out several data-cleansing and standardisation steps. A key objective was to remove irrelevant “noise” from text inputs and ensure more uniform model outputs.

Banks also implemented several techniques to remove or obscure sensitive information. This included data masking, tokenisation in a data-security context, synthetic data generation, and pseudonymisation.

how to generate synthetic data genaiSource: HKMA

Beyond structured data, banks also worked with large amounts of unstructured content. Document pre-processing remains important, even for multimodal LLMs.

As LLMs also have a limited context window, long documents must be split into smaller, logically structured segments. Data chunking helped in preserving context, according to the report.

Data Augmentation

To reduce the risk of overfitting and minimise hallucinations arising from limited training samples, select banks used data augmentation to expand and enrich their datasets. Another method focused on synthesising user inputs.

Banks also paid close attention to multilingual balance. Tests confirmed that balancing English, Traditional Chinese, and Simplified Chinese is critical to prevent data skew and ensure terminological accuracy across language variants.

Data Quality Check

A thorough data quality check is vital to assess the reliability of the data assets and uncover any underlying issues.

Handling missing data was another important part of the process.

This required identifying which fields were optional or frequently absent, then deciding on the most appropriate approach: whether to impute the missing values, label them as “Unknown,” or remove non-essential fields that were consistently incomplete.

The final step was comprehensive documentation, which ensured the entire process could be reproduced and provided a clear reference for future updates.

Continuous Data Updates

key optimisation strategies Source: HKMA

Maintaining model accuracy requires a continuous flow of fresh, relevant data. This would involve implementing automated or semi-automated data pipelines designed to ingest new information from approved sources.

Once collected, this incoming data was processed using the same cleansing and standardisation procedures applied during the initial pre-processing stage, ensuring consistency across the dataset.

With refreshed and expanded datasets in place, periodic model retraining would help prevent performance degradation over time and ensure the model stayed aligned with evolving language patterns, product updates, and current market conditions.

Strong Early Results, With Guardrails Still Essential

The first cohort of the HKMA GenAI Sandbox delivered clear, tangible gains for participating banks.

Fine-tuned LLMs were also able to analyse 100% of case narratives, far surpassing traditional sampling methods. User response was consistently positive as well, with 86% of GenAI outputs rated favourably and more than 70% of GenAI-generated credit assessments considered valuable references.

business outcomes of genai sandboxSource: HKMA

At the same time, the sandbox’s report indicated that risks still must be managed. Hallucinations and factual inaccuracies remain key concerns in high-stakes banking environments.

While advanced prompt-engineering techniques helped reduce these errors, banks recognised that these methods mitigate rather than eliminate the issue. For sensitive applications, additional safeguards like RAG and fine-tuning are still required to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Key priorities for the second cohort include “embedding AI governance within three lines of defence, developing ‘AI vs AI’ frameworks for proactive risk management, and implementing adaptive guardrails and self-correcting systems”.

Featured image by freepik on Freepik

The post Banks Can Slash Production Time by Up to 60% with GenAI, HKMA Report Reveals appeared first on Fintech Hong Kong.

Market Opportunity
FINANCE Logo
FINANCE Price(FINANCE)
$0.0002124
$0.0002124$0.0002124
-4.02%
USD
FINANCE (FINANCE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

WIF Price Prediction: Targeting $0.48 Recovery Within 2 Weeks as MACD Shows Bullish Divergence

WIF Price Prediction: Targeting $0.48 Recovery Within 2 Weeks as MACD Shows Bullish Divergence

The post WIF Price Prediction: Targeting $0.48 Recovery Within 2 Weeks as MACD Shows Bullish Divergence appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. James Ding Dec 16
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 17:32
IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

The post IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 18:00 Discover why BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet launch makes it the best crypto to buy today as Story (IP) price jumps to $11.75 and Hyperliquid hits new highs. Recent crypto market numbers show strength but also some limits. The Story (IP) price jump has been sharp, fueled by big buybacks and speculation, yet critics point out that revenue still lags far behind its valuation. The Hyperliquid (HYPE) price looks solid around the mid-$50s after a new all-time high, but questions remain about sustainability once the hype around USDH proposals cools down. So the obvious question is: why chase coins that are either stretched thin or at risk of retracing when you could back a network that’s already proving itself on the ground? That’s where BlockDAG comes in. While other chains are stuck dealing with validator congestion or outages, BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet will be stress-testing its EVM-compatible smart chain with real miners before listing. For anyone looking for the best crypto coin to buy, the choice between waiting on fixes or joining live progress feels like an easy one. BlockDAG: Smart Chain Running Before Launch Ethereum continues to wrestle with gas congestion, and Solana is still known for network freezes, yet BlockDAG is already showing a different picture. Its upcoming Awakening Testnet, set to launch on September 25, isn’t just a demo; it’s a live rollout where the chain’s base protocols are being stress-tested with miners connected globally. EVM compatibility is active, account abstraction is built in, and tools like updated vesting contracts and Stratum integration are already functional. Instead of waiting for fixes like other networks, BlockDAG is proving its infrastructure in real time. What makes this even more important is that the technology is operational before the coin even hits exchanges. That…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:32
Tests upper descending wedge boundary near 1.3800

Tests upper descending wedge boundary near 1.3800

The post Tests upper descending wedge boundary near 1.3800 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/CAD gains ground after registering modest losses in the previous
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 17:37