The post Apple challenges new Indian rule that lets the CCI fine firms based on global turnover appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Apple has challenged India’s amended penalty laws, arguing that the country’s regulators have no jurisdiction over global revenues. India has amended its penalty laws and now allows fines of up to 10% of a company’s global turnover, as against the standard penalty levied against domestic or product-specific revenue.  Court challenges India’s global turnover penalty law Apple has filed a petition with the Delhi High Court challenging a recent change to the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) penalty rules. Under the amended law, which was introduced via changes to the Competition Act, 2002, and the associated 2024 guidelines, the CCI can calculate fines based on a company’s global turnover rather than just its India-specific or product-specific revenue.  In its 545-page filing reportedly seen by Reuters, Apple describes applying global turnover to penalties as “arbitrary, unconstitutional, grossly disproportionate, unjust.” The company believes the new law is an overreach under the Indian Constitution. With the 2023 amendment and 2024 guidelines, the CCI can now impose fines up to 10% of a company’s global revenue from all services and products if “relevant turnover” cannot be determined or is deemed insufficient.  Apple argued that the CCI lacks jurisdiction over worldwide revenues, especially if the alleged misconduct is confined to its Indian operations.  If the courts reject Apple’s challenge, the firm could face a maximum fine of roughly $38 billion, which is about 10% of its average global turnover for fiscal years 2022–2024. The European Commission also allows regulators to fine firms up to 10% of global turnover for competition violations.  The hearing is scheduled for December 3.  The antitrust dispute  Since 2022, the CCI has examined accusations brought by firms, including Match Group (owner of Tinder) and Indian startups that Apple engaged in “abusive conduct” on its iOS app ecosystem.  Specifically, the CCI has scrutinized… The post Apple challenges new Indian rule that lets the CCI fine firms based on global turnover appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Apple has challenged India’s amended penalty laws, arguing that the country’s regulators have no jurisdiction over global revenues. India has amended its penalty laws and now allows fines of up to 10% of a company’s global turnover, as against the standard penalty levied against domestic or product-specific revenue.  Court challenges India’s global turnover penalty law Apple has filed a petition with the Delhi High Court challenging a recent change to the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) penalty rules. Under the amended law, which was introduced via changes to the Competition Act, 2002, and the associated 2024 guidelines, the CCI can calculate fines based on a company’s global turnover rather than just its India-specific or product-specific revenue.  In its 545-page filing reportedly seen by Reuters, Apple describes applying global turnover to penalties as “arbitrary, unconstitutional, grossly disproportionate, unjust.” The company believes the new law is an overreach under the Indian Constitution. With the 2023 amendment and 2024 guidelines, the CCI can now impose fines up to 10% of a company’s global revenue from all services and products if “relevant turnover” cannot be determined or is deemed insufficient.  Apple argued that the CCI lacks jurisdiction over worldwide revenues, especially if the alleged misconduct is confined to its Indian operations.  If the courts reject Apple’s challenge, the firm could face a maximum fine of roughly $38 billion, which is about 10% of its average global turnover for fiscal years 2022–2024. The European Commission also allows regulators to fine firms up to 10% of global turnover for competition violations.  The hearing is scheduled for December 3.  The antitrust dispute  Since 2022, the CCI has examined accusations brought by firms, including Match Group (owner of Tinder) and Indian startups that Apple engaged in “abusive conduct” on its iOS app ecosystem.  Specifically, the CCI has scrutinized…

Apple challenges new Indian rule that lets the CCI fine firms based on global turnover

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Apple has challenged India’s amended penalty laws, arguing that the country’s regulators have no jurisdiction over global revenues.

India has amended its penalty laws and now allows fines of up to 10% of a company’s global turnover, as against the standard penalty levied against domestic or product-specific revenue. 

Court challenges India’s global turnover penalty law

Apple has filed a petition with the Delhi High Court challenging a recent change to the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) penalty rules. Under the amended law, which was introduced via changes to the Competition Act, 2002, and the associated 2024 guidelines, the CCI can calculate fines based on a company’s global turnover rather than just its India-specific or product-specific revenue. 

In its 545-page filing reportedly seen by Reuters, Apple describes applying global turnover to penalties as “arbitrary, unconstitutional, grossly disproportionate, unjust.” The company believes the new law is an overreach under the Indian Constitution.

With the 2023 amendment and 2024 guidelines, the CCI can now impose fines up to 10% of a company’s global revenue from all services and products if “relevant turnover” cannot be determined or is deemed insufficient. 

Apple argued that the CCI lacks jurisdiction over worldwide revenues, especially if the alleged misconduct is confined to its Indian operations. 

If the courts reject Apple’s challenge, the firm could face a maximum fine of roughly $38 billion, which is about 10% of its average global turnover for fiscal years 2022–2024. The European Commission also allows regulators to fine firms up to 10% of global turnover for competition violations. 

The hearing is scheduled for December 3. 

The antitrust dispute 

Since 2022, the CCI has examined accusations brought by firms, including Match Group (owner of Tinder) and Indian startups that Apple engaged in “abusive conduct” on its iOS app ecosystem. 

Specifically, the CCI has scrutinized Apple’s policy of disallowing third-party payment processors for in-app purchases, forcing developers to use Apple’s own system with fees of up to 30%.  

Apple has so far denied any wrongdoing despite having similar cases in Europe, Russia, Germany and Turkey.  

European Commission regulators recently fined Apple €500 million for violating “anti-steering” rules. They found that Apple’s App Store contract terms prevented developers from offering users cheaper offers outside Apple’s ecosystem. 

In Russia, Apple paid fines of up to $13.7 million over “anti-steering” allegations in 2022. Russian authorities found its App Store payment restrictions anticompetitive. 

Legal experts say it may be difficult for Apple to overturn India’s clearly drafted legislative policy. One practitioner stated that the amended law is “clear” regarding CCI’s jurisdiction over global turnovers.

Other large technology companies like Google and Meta are also facing charges over dominant and anticompetitive practices.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas – 30 days free access to our trading program

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/apple-38b-penalty-india-antitrust-case/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release

The post A Netflix ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Short Film Has Been Rated For Release appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix Everyone has wondered what may be the next step for KPop Demon Hunters as an IP, given its record-breaking success on Netflix. Now, the answer may be something exactly no one predicted. According to a new filing with the MPA, something called Debut: A KPop Demon Hunters Story has been rated PG by the ratings body. It’s listed alongside some other films, and this is obviously something that has not been publicly announced. A short film could be well, very short, a few minutes, and likely no more than ten. Even that might be pushing it. Using say, Pixar shorts as a reference, most are between 4 and 8 minutes. The original movie is an hour and 36 minutes. The “Debut” in the title indicates some sort of flashback, perhaps to when HUNTR/X first arrived on the scene before they blew up. Previously, director Maggie Kang has commented about how there were more backstory components that were supposed to be in the film that were cut, but hinted those could be explored in a sequel. But perhaps some may be put into a short here. I very much doubt those scenes were fully produced and simply cut, but perhaps they were finished up for this short film here. When would Debut: KPop Demon Hunters theoretically arrive? I’m not sure the other films on the list are much help. Dead of Winter is out in less than two weeks. Mother Mary does not have a release date. Ne Zha 2 came out earlier this year. I’ve only seen news stories saying The Perfect Gamble was supposed to come out in Q1 2025, but I’ve seen no evidence that it actually has. KPop Demon Hunters Netflix It could be sooner rather than later as Netflix looks to capitalize…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:23
Bitcoin Cash: price +7% at $647, breakout and key levels (09/18/2025)

Bitcoin Cash: price +7% at $647, breakout and key levels (09/18/2025)

Bitcoin Cash gains 7% and reaches $647, hitting highs not seen since last April: the movement fits into a risk-on climate.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/09/18 21:47