The post Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal Contemplates Reverting POL Token To Longstanding MATIC Ticker As Community Debates ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Sandeep Nailwal, the co-founder of Polygon, a layer-2 network atop the Ethereum blockchain, has sparked a public debate on social media after asking members of the crypto community whether the network should revert the POL token ticker back to its original MATIC name. Should POL Token Transition Back To Its Original MATIC Ticker? In a Tuesday post on X, Sandeep Nailwal said he personally thinks that the Polygon network should stick with POL as enough people know about it. However, he continues to hear feedback that MATIC, unlike the newly adopted POL, was a much stronger and familiar ticker especially among retail users who are now confused about the token’s whereabouts. The counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went,” Nailwal wrote. As such, he asked his X followers whether they think they should change the token back to MATIC. “I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up,” he said, calling it a “thought experiment”.  Polygon developers changed the token’s ticker from MATIC to POL in September 2024 as a crucial component of the project’s network upgrade under the “Polygon 2.0” roadmap. POL maintained MATIC’s existing tokenomics and supply of 10 billion tokens. The changeover aimed to transform the network into a zero-knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine (zkEVM) system and consolidate liquidity across multiple chains, with POL becoming the native gas and staking token for Polygon’s main proof-of-stake chain. Advertisement &nbsp An X user going by the name Mo Ezeldin believes the ticker should be reverted to MATIC as most early adopters associate the project with that name and retail familiarity is a crucial factor.  “We haven’t… The post Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal Contemplates Reverting POL Token To Longstanding MATIC Ticker As Community Debates ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Sandeep Nailwal, the co-founder of Polygon, a layer-2 network atop the Ethereum blockchain, has sparked a public debate on social media after asking members of the crypto community whether the network should revert the POL token ticker back to its original MATIC name. Should POL Token Transition Back To Its Original MATIC Ticker? In a Tuesday post on X, Sandeep Nailwal said he personally thinks that the Polygon network should stick with POL as enough people know about it. However, he continues to hear feedback that MATIC, unlike the newly adopted POL, was a much stronger and familiar ticker especially among retail users who are now confused about the token’s whereabouts. The counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went,” Nailwal wrote. As such, he asked his X followers whether they think they should change the token back to MATIC. “I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up,” he said, calling it a “thought experiment”.  Polygon developers changed the token’s ticker from MATIC to POL in September 2024 as a crucial component of the project’s network upgrade under the “Polygon 2.0” roadmap. POL maintained MATIC’s existing tokenomics and supply of 10 billion tokens. The changeover aimed to transform the network into a zero-knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine (zkEVM) system and consolidate liquidity across multiple chains, with POL becoming the native gas and staking token for Polygon’s main proof-of-stake chain. Advertisement &nbsp An X user going by the name Mo Ezeldin believes the ticker should be reverted to MATIC as most early adopters associate the project with that name and retail familiarity is a crucial factor.  “We haven’t…

Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal Contemplates Reverting POL Token To Longstanding MATIC Ticker As Community Debates ⋆ ZyCrypto

2025/11/27 07:12
Advertisement

Sandeep Nailwal, the co-founder of Polygon, a layer-2 network atop the Ethereum blockchain, has sparked a public debate on social media after asking members of the crypto community whether the network should revert the POL token ticker back to its original MATIC name.

Should POL Token Transition Back To Its Original MATIC Ticker?

In a Tuesday post on X, Sandeep Nailwal said he personally thinks that the Polygon network should stick with POL as enough people know about it. However, he continues to hear feedback that MATIC, unlike the newly adopted POL, was a much stronger and familiar ticker especially among retail users who are now confused about the token’s whereabouts.

The counter-argument I keep getting is: “the guy in the Philippines running a sari-sari store, or an Uber driver in Dubai, knew MATIC… and now he has no idea where it went,” Nailwal wrote.

As such, he asked his X followers whether they think they should change the token back to MATIC. “I’m genuinely curious what the broader community thinks, because this feedback keeps coming up,” he said, calling it a “thought experiment”. 

Polygon developers changed the token’s ticker from MATIC to POL in September 2024 as a crucial component of the project’s network upgrade under the “Polygon 2.0” roadmap. POL maintained MATIC’s existing tokenomics and supply of 10 billion tokens. The changeover aimed to transform the network into a zero-knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine (zkEVM) system and consolidate liquidity across multiple chains, with POL becoming the native gas and staking token for Polygon’s main proof-of-stake chain.

Advertisement

 

An X user going by the name Mo Ezeldin believes the ticker should be reverted to MATIC as most early adopters associate the project with that name and retail familiarity is a crucial factor. 

“We haven’t really seen a new wave of retail entrants into the markets, so going back to Matic might actually be the play here,” Ezeldin opined. 

Meanwhile, others, like martijnde_boer, suggested that Polygon should stick to POL and instead focus on building because fundamentals matter more than tickers.

Source: https://zycrypto.com/polygons-sandeep-nailwal-contemplates-reverting-pol-token-to-longstanding-matic-ticker-as-community-debates/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52