Government data shows that over 2.04 lakh private companies ceased operations between FY21 and FY25, with FY22 and FY23 alone accounting for more than 1.47 lakh closures.Government data shows that over 2.04 lakh private companies ceased operations between FY21 and FY25, with FY22 and FY23 alone accounting for more than 1.47 lakh closures.

Over 2 lakh private companies shut in five years: Minister

More than 2.04 lakh private companies have shut shop in India in the past five financial years, said Harsh Malhotra, Minister of State in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and Minister of State in the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. 

Answering a question on Monday, December 1, he said, as many as 2.04 lakh private companies formally shut down between FY21 and FY25 due to amalgamation, conversion, dissolution, or strike-off under various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

However, the data reveals a significant year-on-year fluctuation, with 15,216 companies shutting down between 2020–21, surging to 64,054 in 2021–22 and further to 83,452 companies in 2022-23. The trend then reversed, dropping to 21,181 companies in 2023-24 and 20,365 companies closing down in 2024-25. 

The steep rise in closures during FY22 and FY23, together accounting for more than 1.47 lakh shutdowns, marks the highest two-year spike in the five-year period. 

In response to questions about employee rehabilitation schemes for workers affected by company closures, the government stated that there are no such proposals before the government.

While the government did not provide reasons for the year-on-year fluctuations, it clarified that the closures result from standard legal processes such as voluntary winding up, dissolution due to amalgamation, and regulatory strike-offs for non-compliance or inactivity.

Regarding employees rehabilitation, the minister stated there is no proposal before the government to implement any such scheme. The ministry also confirmed that no special programmes are currently under consideration for workers affected by company shutdowns.

Clarifying a query regarding ‘shell companies,’ that is, companies that are legally-formed without any active business operations or significant assets, the ministry informed that the term is not defined under the Companies Act, 2013. 

However, it emphasised that the government regularly undertakes strike-off action under Section 248(1) against companies that have failed to carry out business for two consecutive financial years or have not met statutory requirements such as paying initial subscription amounts or filing the mandated declaration within 180 days of incorporation.

The government also addressed questions on offering tax exemptions or incentives to corporates setting up industries in rural or backward regions. It assured its broader policy stance of phasing out exemptions and deductions in favour of a simplified, transparent tax regime. Current reforms focus on improving ease of doing business, including reductions in corporate tax rates for domestic companies, rather than region-specific incentives.

“The government has undertaken several reforms to promote investment and ease of doing business, including substantial reduction in corporate tax rates for both costing and new domestic companies,” the statement read. 


Edited by Megha Reddy

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.003988
$0.003988$0.003988
-2.30%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/17 17:00
X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X says its Terms of Service will change Jan. 15, 2026, expanding how the platform defines user “Content” and adding contract language tied to the operation and
Share
CryptoSlate2025/12/17 19:24
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12