THE ONGOING legal dispute between DigiPlus Interactive Corp. and former Party-list Rep. Elizaldy S. Co involving the Midas Hotel and Casino could weigh on operations and investor sentiment, though the financial impact on the company is expected to be limited, analysts said.THE ONGOING legal dispute between DigiPlus Interactive Corp. and former Party-list Rep. Elizaldy S. Co involving the Midas Hotel and Casino could weigh on operations and investor sentiment, though the financial impact on the company is expected to be limited, analysts said.

Legal row over Midas Hotel could influence DigiPlus outlook — analysts

By Alexandria Grace C. Magno

THE ONGOING legal dispute between DigiPlus Interactive Corp. and former Party-list Rep. Elizaldy S. Co involving the Midas Hotel and Casino could weigh on operations and investor sentiment, though the financial impact on the company is expected to be limited, analysts said.

“Because the dispute concerns ownership or management of Midas Hotel and Casino, operations may face uncertainty as long as the appeal in court remains unresolved,” Regina Capital Development Corp. Head of Sales Luis A. Limlingan said in a Viber message.

“For investors, a still-pending court appeal may introduce risk and uncertainty. In the long run, if the dispute drags on, it could compromise the value or use of Midas Hotel, limiting PLUS’ ability to leverage that asset, which could result in the company shifting its focus on alternative assets like New Coast or its digital platforms. However, if the dispute resolves cleanly, this could strengthen the company’s resolve and credibility, potentially helping PLUS when negotiating future partnerships or investments in Philippine tourism and gaming, as the broader hospitality industry in the Philippines is seeing large-scale hotel developments and growing demand,” he added.

AP Securities, Inc. Equity Research Analyst Shawn Ray R. Atienza said the issue may create “a slight hit on investor confidence on PLUS near-term, but boost reputation long term as the company’s exposé of Zaldy Co’s parasitical practices as a business partner shows their boldness to call out malpractices by peers.”

Law firm Villaraza & Angangco confirmed that the case between former Ako Bicol Representative Mr. Co and DigiPlus, formerly Leisure & Resorts World Corp. (LRWC), is still ongoing.

DigiPlus previously won an arbitration case on the valuation of the Midas Hotel and Casino, but Mr. Co’s firm, Eco Leisure and Hospitality Holding Co., has challenged the decision before the Pasig Regional Trial Court, where the appeal remains pending.

DigiPlus issued its statement after social media posts on Friday claimed that the Anti-Money Laundering Council’s freeze order on the former lawmaker’s bank accounts could benefit the online gaming company.

In a 2020 disclosure, LRWC said it entered into an investment agreement on Nov. 11, 2012 with Eco Leisure and Hotel Enterprises of the Philippines, Inc. (HEPI) to acquire 51% of HEPI, which operates the Midas Hotel and Casino. LRWC invested P750 million in cash for the transaction. Some reports have stated that LRWC signed a preliminary agreement with Eco Leisure and Hospitality Holding Co. to acquire 50% of HEPI for about P800 million.

Mr. Atienza said the freeze order on Mr. Co’s assets could affect Midas operations and investor sentiment in the short term. However, he noted that the financial exposure is relatively small.

“We assume that the freeze order imposed on Zaldy Co’s assets presents chances of a disruption, or even a complete halt in Midas’ operations [but] an operational halt only has minimal material impact on [Digiplus’] financials as their net JV (with HEPI) only accounts for 4.6% of their book value (based on FY24 FS), so their growth prospects from international expansion remain unchallenged by this news,” he said.

DigiPlus shares fell by 0.82% or 20 centavos to close at P24.30 on Monday.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash

The post This is How Dogecoin Holders Responded After the Market Crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Dogecoin price dropped sharply over the past several
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/02 03:58
Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu Price Prediction: How High Can SHIB Go by the End of 2026?

Shiba Inu is back in the conversation, and the talk isn’t all about the recent price action. After the broader market took a hit, the SHIB price slid from around
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/02 04:30