The post Long-Term Deals For Free Agents Aren’t Always Wise Investments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bobby Bonilla left the Mets after 1999 but still gets annual seven-figure checks every July 1 because of deferred dollars in his deal. (AP Photo/Osamu Honda) Copyright 1992 AP. All rights reserved. With one eye on the upcoming winter meetings and another on the end of the Basic Agreement between owners and players, baseball executives are understandably wary of giving fat contracts to veteran free agents. Too many players once considered panaceas soured so quickly in their new environs that they yielded little or no return on investment. Ask any general manager and he’ll know about all the big-name stars who imploded because of unpredictable injuries or poor performance. List of Flops The list of culprits is long – and dates all the way back to the dawn of free agency in 1976. In alphabetical order, they include Bobby Bonilla, Kevin Brown, Yoenis Cespedes, Carl Crawford, Chris Davis, Nick Esasky, Jacoby Ellsbury, Wayne Garland, Josh Hamilton, Mike Hampton, Jason Heyward, Anthony Rendon, Pablo Sandoval, Stephen Strasberg, and Barry Zito. After pitching the Nationals to their only world championship in 2019, Stephen Strasburg encountered a wave of injuries that knocked him out of the game. (Photo by Rich Pilling/MLB via Getty Images) MLB via Getty Images All of them were solid players at one time whose fortunes went south for various reasons after they signed long-term, high-dollar deals – many of them guaranteed or containing no-trade clauses. Esasky was just 30 when he left the Boston Red Sox after a 30-homer season that also included 108 runs batted in. But the first baseman gave the Atlanta Braves, who signed him, just 35 at-bats over nine games – and a not a single extra-base hit or RBI. A victim of vertigo, he hit .171 and retired. The Braves got no return on… The post Long-Term Deals For Free Agents Aren’t Always Wise Investments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bobby Bonilla left the Mets after 1999 but still gets annual seven-figure checks every July 1 because of deferred dollars in his deal. (AP Photo/Osamu Honda) Copyright 1992 AP. All rights reserved. With one eye on the upcoming winter meetings and another on the end of the Basic Agreement between owners and players, baseball executives are understandably wary of giving fat contracts to veteran free agents. Too many players once considered panaceas soured so quickly in their new environs that they yielded little or no return on investment. Ask any general manager and he’ll know about all the big-name stars who imploded because of unpredictable injuries or poor performance. List of Flops The list of culprits is long – and dates all the way back to the dawn of free agency in 1976. In alphabetical order, they include Bobby Bonilla, Kevin Brown, Yoenis Cespedes, Carl Crawford, Chris Davis, Nick Esasky, Jacoby Ellsbury, Wayne Garland, Josh Hamilton, Mike Hampton, Jason Heyward, Anthony Rendon, Pablo Sandoval, Stephen Strasberg, and Barry Zito. After pitching the Nationals to their only world championship in 2019, Stephen Strasburg encountered a wave of injuries that knocked him out of the game. (Photo by Rich Pilling/MLB via Getty Images) MLB via Getty Images All of them were solid players at one time whose fortunes went south for various reasons after they signed long-term, high-dollar deals – many of them guaranteed or containing no-trade clauses. Esasky was just 30 when he left the Boston Red Sox after a 30-homer season that also included 108 runs batted in. But the first baseman gave the Atlanta Braves, who signed him, just 35 at-bats over nine games – and a not a single extra-base hit or RBI. A victim of vertigo, he hit .171 and retired. The Braves got no return on…

Long-Term Deals For Free Agents Aren’t Always Wise Investments

2025/12/05 06:36

Bobby Bonilla left the Mets after 1999 but still gets annual seven-figure checks every July 1 because of deferred dollars in his deal. (AP Photo/Osamu Honda)

Copyright 1992 AP. All rights reserved.

With one eye on the upcoming winter meetings and another on the end of the Basic Agreement between owners and players, baseball executives are understandably wary of giving fat contracts to veteran free agents.

Too many players once considered panaceas soured so quickly in their new environs that they yielded little or no return on investment.

Ask any general manager and he’ll know about all the big-name stars who imploded because of unpredictable injuries or poor performance.

List of Flops

The list of culprits is long – and dates all the way back to the dawn of free agency in 1976.

In alphabetical order, they include Bobby Bonilla, Kevin Brown, Yoenis Cespedes, Carl Crawford, Chris Davis, Nick Esasky, Jacoby Ellsbury, Wayne Garland, Josh Hamilton, Mike Hampton, Jason Heyward, Anthony Rendon, Pablo Sandoval, Stephen Strasberg, and Barry Zito.

After pitching the Nationals to their only world championship in 2019, Stephen Strasburg encountered a wave of injuries that knocked him out of the game. (Photo by Rich Pilling/MLB via Getty Images)

MLB via Getty Images

All of them were solid players at one time whose fortunes went south for various reasons after they signed long-term, high-dollar deals – many of them guaranteed or containing no-trade clauses.

Esasky was just 30 when he left the Boston Red Sox after a 30-homer season that also included 108 runs batted in. But the first baseman gave the Atlanta Braves, who signed him, just 35 at-bats over nine games – and a not a single extra-base hit or RBI. A victim of vertigo, he hit .171 and retired. The Braves got no return on their three-year, $5.7 million guaranteed contract.

Garland was the poster boy for poorly-performing pitchers. The first player to get a 10-year contract, he jumped from the Baltimore Orioles to the Cleveland club now known as the Guardians. His guaranteed contract called for $2.3 million – big bucks in that first year of free agency – after a dozen teams drafted negotiating rights to him in the re-entry draft then in use. Garland got all that money after going 20-7 with a 2.67 earned run average for the ‘76 Orioles but that was the only winning season of his nine-year career. Bedeviled by injuries, he lost 19 times in the first year of his new contract and, like Esasky, was done by age 30.

Fast forward to 2019, when the Washington Nationals rode the bat of Anthony Rendon and the arm of Stephen Strasburg to the only world championship in team history.

Unable to afford both after they hit free agency, the Nats kept the pitcher, giving him the same seven-year, $245 million contract Rendon received from the Los Angeles Angels. Strasburg pitched 31 1/3 innings over three seasons and was done for good at 33. He won exactly one game before retiring with four years left on his contract.

After leading the National League with 126 RBIs in 2019, Rendon never again played as many as 60 games in a season. The Angels bought out the remainder of his contract after the 2025 season.

Rendon’s inflated pact, which has one year and $38 million to go, represents some 25 per cent of the Angels’ $166 payroll, according to Roster Resource. But it was not as bad as Bobby Bonilla’s, which seems to have a half-life.

After suffering significant losses in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme, Mets owners Fred and Jeff Wilpon renegotiated Bonilla’s contract – even though he had stopped playing for the team one year earlier.

So it was that the 2000 Mets bought out the $5.9 million still owed to Bonilla. Adding 8 per cent annual interest, the team agreed to pay him $1.19 million every July 1 through 2035, when he’ll hit the ripe old age of 72. Another deferred-dollars deal, which started in 2004, brings him $500,000 a year through 2029.

Mets fans now “mark” Bobby Bonilla Day every July 1.

But wait, there’s more! According to ESPN, the Mets also have an obligation to pay Bret Saberhagen $250,000 a year for 25 years.

Max Scherzer pitched for Toronto last season while still drawing deferred dollars from the Nationals. (Photo by Cole Burston/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Another former Met, Max Scherzer, still gets annual stipends from the Washington Nationals until his deferred $105 million is paid in full through 2028. Little matter that he’s pitched for a handful of other clubs since.

Chris Davis is also counting the cash that comes in the wake of his deferred contract. His $59 million in deferments is spread over 15 years, continuing through 2037. From 2026-32, Davis will receive $3.5 million per annum from the Baltimore Orioles, whose initial investment went south in a hurry.

Another former slugger, Manny Ramirez, is still receiving annual checks from the Boston Red Sox, though the cash stream will end in 2026 when his $24.2 million in deferred dollars ends.

Awards Don’t Help

Even awards winners are not exempt from the malaise that marks many free agent signees.

Barry Zito brought a Cy Young Award along when he signed with San Francisco but didn’t maintain his award-winning form. (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Zito, who had won a Cy Young with the Athletics, was basically a zero for San Francisco after signing a seven-year, $126 million pact to move across the bay. And Hamilton, a one-time American League MVP, was awful in the wake of a five-year, $125 million contract that crashed when he his drug rehabilitation program collapsed.

Heyward got eight years and $125 million but failed to hit for the Cubs despite the cozy confines of Wrigley Field. Ditto for Crawford, whose seven-year, $145 million deal didn’t protect him from persistent injuries.

The curious case of Mike Hampton can’t be overlooked either. Desperate for a big-name starter, the Rockies gave him eight years at $121 million but quickly learned that Coors Field is often a graveyard for pitchers because balls travel in the thin alpine air – as Hampton proved when he hit seven home runs in a single season.

Panda’s Pact

Sandoval, MVP of the 2012 World Series for San Francisco, earned himself five years and $95 million from the Red Sox but failed to take advantage of Fenway’s Green Monster.

The free agent class of 2026 is virtually certain to produce its share of hits and misses as well.

Now it is up to the owners, executives, and agents to pick and choose as carefully as the mom shopping for holiday goodies. As baseball history proves, looks can be deceiving.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschlossberg/2025/12/04/long-term-deals-for-free-agents-arent-always-wise-investments/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge

The post Tom Lee Predicts Major Bitcoin Adoption Surge appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Tom Lee suggests significant future Bitcoin adoption. Potential 200x increase in Bitcoin adoption forecast. Ethereum positioned as key settlement layer for tokenization. Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat Global Advisors, predicted at Binance Blockchain Week that Bitcoin adoption could surge 200-fold amid shifts in institutional and retirement capital allocations. This outlook suggests a potential major restructuring of financial ecosystems, boosting Bitcoin and Ethereum as core assets, with tokenization poised to reshape markets significantly. Tom Lee Projects 200x Bitcoin Adoption Increase Tom Lee, known for his bullish stance on digital assets, suggested that Bitcoin might experience a 200 times adoption growth as more traditional retirement accounts transition to Bitcoin holdings. He predicts a break from Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle. Despite a market slowdown, Lee sees tokenization as a key trend with Wall Street eyeing on-chain financial products. The immediate implications suggest significant structural changes in digital finance. Lee highlighted that the adoption of a Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock exemplifies potential shifts in finance. If retirement funds begin reallocating to Bitcoin, it could catalyze substantial growth. Community reactions appear positive, with some experts agreeing that the tokenization of traditional finance is inevitable. Statements from Lee argue that Ethereum’s role in this transformation is crucial, resonating with broader positive sentiment from institutional and retail investors. As Lee explained, “2025 is the year of tokenization,” highlighting U.S. policy shifts and stablecoin volumes as key components of a bullish outlook. source Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the Future of Finance Did you know? Tom Lee suggests Bitcoin might deviate from its historical four-year cycle, driven by massive institutional interest and tokenization trends, potentially marking a new era in cryptocurrency adoption. Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $92,567.31, dominating 58.67% of the market. Its market cap stands at $1.85 trillion with a fully diluted market cap of $1.94 trillion.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:42
‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20?

The post ‘Real product market fit’ – Can Chainlink’s ETF moment finally unlock $20? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chainlink has officially joined the U.S. Spot ETF club, following Grayscale’s successful debut on the 3rd of December.  The product achieved $13 million in day-one trading volume, significantly lower than the Solana [SOL] and Ripple [XRP], which saw $56 million and $33 million during their respective launches.  However, the Grayscale spot Chainlink [LINK] ETF saw $42 million in inflows during the launch. Reacting to the performance, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it “another insta-hit.” “Also $41m in first day flows. Another insta-hit from the crypto world, only dud so far was Doge, but it’s still early.” Source: Bloomberg For his part, James Seyffart, another Bloomberg ETF analyst, said the debut volume was “strong” and “impressive.” He added,  “Chainlink showing that longer tail assets can find success in the ETF wrapper too.” The performance also meant broader market demand for LINK exposure, noted Peter Mintzberg, Grayscale CEO.  Impact on LINK markets Bitwise has also applied for a Spot LINK ETF and could receive the green light to trade soon. That said, LINK’s Open Interest (OI) surged from $194 million to nearly $240 million after the launch.  The surge indicated a surge in speculative interest for the token on the Futures market.  Source: Velo By extension, it also showed bullish sentiment following the debut. On the price charts, LINK rallied 8.6%, extending its weekly recovery to over 20% from around $12 to $15 before easing to $14.4 as of press time. It was still 47% down from the recent peak of $27.  The immediate overheads for bulls were $15 and $16, and clearing them could raise the odds for tagging $20. Especially if the ETF inflows extend.  Source: LINK/USDT, TradingView Assessing Chainlink’s growth Chainlink has grown over the years and has become the top decentralized oracle provider, offering numerous blockchain projects…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/05 10:26