South Korea prepares to impose bank-level liability rules. This forces crypto exchanges to compensate users for losses, regardless of the cause. South Korea is preparing to impose bank-level, no-fault liability rules on crypto exchanges. This imposes the same stringent standards on exchanges as conventional financial institutions. The recent breach at Upbit brought this regulatory shift […] The post South Korea Plans Bank-Level Liability Rules for Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.South Korea prepares to impose bank-level liability rules. This forces crypto exchanges to compensate users for losses, regardless of the cause. South Korea is preparing to impose bank-level, no-fault liability rules on crypto exchanges. This imposes the same stringent standards on exchanges as conventional financial institutions. The recent breach at Upbit brought this regulatory shift […] The post South Korea Plans Bank-Level Liability Rules for Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

South Korea Plans Bank-Level Liability Rules for Crypto Exchanges

2025/12/08 00:00

South Korea prepares to impose bank-level liability rules. This forces crypto exchanges to compensate users for losses, regardless of the cause.

South Korea is preparing to impose bank-level, no-fault liability rules on crypto exchanges. This imposes the same stringent standards on exchanges as conventional financial institutions. The recent breach at Upbit brought this regulatory shift into effect.

Regulatory Shift Imposes Strict Financial Standards

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is looking at new provisions. These provisions would have exchanges compensate their customers for losses. This includes losses owing to hacks or system failures. Importantly, this is needed even though the platform is not at fault. This development was reported by the Korea Times on Sunday.

The move certainly indicates that there is a shift in the regulatory focus. It takes major crypto exchanges as seriously as traditional financial platforms. Furthermore, it exercises similar scruples over compliance and consumer protection. It also deals with the overall regulatory guidelines of the booming Korean crypto market.

Related Reading: Crypto News: South Korea Charges Police Officers Amid Bribery Case With Illegal Crypto Exchanges | Live Bitcoin News

The FSC is looking at reviewing these provisions. They particularly target Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). They would require compensation for losses due to hacking or system failure. This obligation remains irrespective of whether the exchange is found to be at fault.

South Korea prepares to impose bank-level liability rules. This forces crypto exchanges to compensate users for losses, regardless of the cause.                                       Source: The Korea Times

This no-fault standard currently applies only to financial institutions. It also includes electronic payment companies. This is provided in the law concerning electronic financial transactions. Thus, the proposed change levels the playing field quite a lot.

The regulatory push comes right on the heels of a November 27 Upbit incident. There were more than 104 billion Solana-based coins involved. These assets, amounting to about 44.5 billion won or $30.1 million, were transferred from outside. This transfer took place in only 54 minutes.

Despite the huge breach, the exchange has not been subjected to many formal punishments. Regulators cannot order compensation at this time, using the existing law. This leaves a huge regulatory loophole.

Upbit Incident Drives Urgent Need for Compensation Mandate

The proposed draft legislation is expected to provide enhanced requirements. This encompasses mandatory IT security infrastructure plans. Moreover, it demands high-end standards for the systems and another for the personnel. It also puts much stiffer penalties in place for not complying.

Lawmakers are under consideration of revising it. This would provide a fine of up to 3% of annual revenue for hacking events. This is applied to the same standard given to traditional financial institutions. The existing fine for crypto exchanges is currently up to 5 billion won.

Trust in safety and system security is still essential. Financial Supervisory Service Chairman Lee Chan-jin made clear of this point clear recently. He said that they are strengthening this part in the second phase of virtual asset legislation.

Consequently, this second phase is expected to reflect a large part of the present monetary law. This includes the obligation to obtain safety and reliability. It also includes measures for much stiffer fines.

Exchanges have standards that need to be met for manpower and facilities. They also have to set up an IT plan every year. In turn, they must submit this to the FSC. This provides oversight on the operational security.

Therefore, this regulatory action has the purpose of enhancing investor confidence. It makes exchanges focus on good cybersecurity practices. This is critical to the long-term sustainability of the industry. The move represents a critical South Korean digital asset sector.

The post South Korea Plans Bank-Level Liability Rules for Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37