The post Kalshi wins reprieve in Connecticut crackdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kalshi has achieved a major procedural victory by obtaining a temporary halt to state enforcement efforts targeting its event-contract markets in its intensifying legal battle with Connecticut authorities. The platform can now claim that its CFTC-regulated derivatives shouldn’t be regarded as unauthorized gambling under state law due to the federal court’s intervention. U.S. District Judge Vernon Oliver ordered on Monday that Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) refrain from taking enforcement action against the derivatives trading firm. At the same time, the court considers the company’s motion for preliminary relief. The ruling came after DCP accused Kalshi, Robinhood, and Crypto.com of providing unauthorized sports-related wagering and sent cease-and-desist warnings to them on December 2. Connecticut challenges Kalshi over unlicensed operations According to DCP Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli, only authorized organizations are permitted to provide sports betting in the state of Connecticut. He claimed that KalshiEX LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, and Crypto.com are not licensed to provide gambling in the Connecticut jurisdiction. Cafferelli added that even if they were licensed, their contracts would break several other state laws and regulations, such as providing gambling to anyone under the age of 21. “These platforms are operating outside of a regulatory environment, posing a serious risk to consumers who may not realize that wagers placed on these illegal platforms offer no protection for their money or information. A prediction market wager is not an investment.” –Kris Gilman, Gaming Director, DCP. Regulators identified several concerns associated with the unlicensed operations, including the lack of technical requirements for safeguarding customer data. The regulators also flagged the absence of protections against insider betting on events with predictable results, such as professional team transactions or award shows. One day later, Kalshi retaliated by suing Connecticut authorities. The derivatives trading firm argued that its markets, which allow users… The post Kalshi wins reprieve in Connecticut crackdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kalshi has achieved a major procedural victory by obtaining a temporary halt to state enforcement efforts targeting its event-contract markets in its intensifying legal battle with Connecticut authorities. The platform can now claim that its CFTC-regulated derivatives shouldn’t be regarded as unauthorized gambling under state law due to the federal court’s intervention. U.S. District Judge Vernon Oliver ordered on Monday that Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) refrain from taking enforcement action against the derivatives trading firm. At the same time, the court considers the company’s motion for preliminary relief. The ruling came after DCP accused Kalshi, Robinhood, and Crypto.com of providing unauthorized sports-related wagering and sent cease-and-desist warnings to them on December 2. Connecticut challenges Kalshi over unlicensed operations According to DCP Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli, only authorized organizations are permitted to provide sports betting in the state of Connecticut. He claimed that KalshiEX LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, and Crypto.com are not licensed to provide gambling in the Connecticut jurisdiction. Cafferelli added that even if they were licensed, their contracts would break several other state laws and regulations, such as providing gambling to anyone under the age of 21. “These platforms are operating outside of a regulatory environment, posing a serious risk to consumers who may not realize that wagers placed on these illegal platforms offer no protection for their money or information. A prediction market wager is not an investment.” –Kris Gilman, Gaming Director, DCP. Regulators identified several concerns associated with the unlicensed operations, including the lack of technical requirements for safeguarding customer data. The regulators also flagged the absence of protections against insider betting on events with predictable results, such as professional team transactions or award shows. One day later, Kalshi retaliated by suing Connecticut authorities. The derivatives trading firm argued that its markets, which allow users…

Kalshi wins reprieve in Connecticut crackdown

Kalshi has achieved a major procedural victory by obtaining a temporary halt to state enforcement efforts targeting its event-contract markets in its intensifying legal battle with Connecticut authorities. The platform can now claim that its CFTC-regulated derivatives shouldn’t be regarded as unauthorized gambling under state law due to the federal court’s intervention.

U.S. District Judge Vernon Oliver ordered on Monday that Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) refrain from taking enforcement action against the derivatives trading firm. At the same time, the court considers the company’s motion for preliminary relief.

The ruling came after DCP accused Kalshi, Robinhood, and Crypto.com of providing unauthorized sports-related wagering and sent cease-and-desist warnings to them on December 2.

Connecticut challenges Kalshi over unlicensed operations

According to DCP Commissioner Bryan T. Cafferelli, only authorized organizations are permitted to provide sports betting in the state of Connecticut. He claimed that KalshiEX LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, and Crypto.com are not licensed to provide gambling in the Connecticut jurisdiction.

Cafferelli added that even if they were licensed, their contracts would break several other state laws and regulations, such as providing gambling to anyone under the age of 21.

Regulators identified several concerns associated with the unlicensed operations, including the lack of technical requirements for safeguarding customer data. The regulators also flagged the absence of protections against insider betting on events with predictable results, such as professional team transactions or award shows.

One day later, Kalshi retaliated by suing Connecticut authorities. The derivatives trading firm argued that its markets, which allow users to trade on future event outcomes, are regulated as derivatives products under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) supervision.

The prediction market platform said that Connecticut’s attempt to regulate its operations intrudes upon the federal framework Congress established to govern derivatives traded on authorized exchanges. Kalshi further stated that the state’s effort to regulate its operations is a field-preemptive and conflict-preemptive.

The prediction market provider argued that Connecticut’s gambling laws do not apply and that the state is overstepping its bounds because the CFTC gave Kalshi designated contract market status in 2020. The prediction market platform requested a temporary restraining order to stop Connecticut from taking any action that would interfere with its business.

Judge Oliver’s ruling grants Kalshi temporary protection as the case proceeds.  According to the schedule established on Monday, Connecticut authorities are required to respond to the firm’s complaint by January 9, 2026.

The Judge also ruled that Connecticut authorities must provide more supporting arguments by January 30. Oral Judgement will happen in mid-February. 

Kalshi faces state enforcement across multiple states

In 2025, Kalshi encountered comparable enforcement activities in Arizona, Illinois, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland, and Ohio, among other states.

On October 9, Kalshi filed a lawsuit against the Ohio Attorney General and the Ohio Casino Control Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The prediction market platform requested a preliminary injunction to prevent Ohio from enforcing state gaming laws against its event contract platform. 

According to the firm, it is regulated by the CFTC. The prediction market platform further stated that Ohio’s attempts to regulate its operations are superseded. 

On April 3, Illinois casino regulators ordered Kalshi to cease providing prediction markets on sports betting. Illinois casino regulators claimed Kalshi’s contracts amount to illegal sports betting under state law.

The 5 Star IGaming Media reported that the division discovered that Kalshi Inc. was listing illegal sports bets for people in the State of Illinois after accessing the website through a mobile application at www.kalshi.com.

On May 22, Arizona’s gambling authority joined the state-by-state campaign against prediction markets in reaction to Kalshi and others’ event contracts on sports and other markets. The Arizona Department of Gaming (ADG) sent a cease-and-desist order to Kalshi and Crypto.com.

Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/kalshi-secures-crucial-enforcement/

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.12873
$0.12873$0.12873
+11.36%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00
Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama to Conduct Sealed-Bid Dutch Auction Using Encryption Tech

Zama unveils innovative public token auction, using proprietary encryption. Bidding begins January 21, 2026. Key details on protocol and market impact.Read more
Share
Coinstats2026/01/20 18:13
Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin

The federal funds rate now stands in a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, a level that reflects a delicate balancing […] The post Fed Finally Cuts Interest Rates – Crypto Boom is About to Begin appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:01