The construction of a nuclear power plant in Labrador, Pangasinan could make the municipality the richest town in the Philippines, a local lawmaker said. “Can you imagine if not only 1,000 megawatts of nuclear (power) is built in Labrador, but maybe 4,000 or even 6,000 megawatts? I think Labrador will become the richest town in […]The construction of a nuclear power plant in Labrador, Pangasinan could make the municipality the richest town in the Philippines, a local lawmaker said. “Can you imagine if not only 1,000 megawatts of nuclear (power) is built in Labrador, but maybe 4,000 or even 6,000 megawatts? I think Labrador will become the richest town in […]

Proposed nuclear power plant could make Pangasinan town rich, says lawmaker

2025/12/10 19:38

The construction of a nuclear power plant in Labrador, Pangasinan could make the municipality the richest town in the Philippines, a local lawmaker said.

“Can you imagine if not only 1,000 megawatts of nuclear (power) is built in Labrador, but maybe 4,000 or even 6,000 megawatts? I think Labrador will become the richest town in the entire Philippines,” Marcos Juan Bruno O. Cojuangco, 2nd District of Pangasinan representative, said during the Atomic Energy Week on Tuesday.

Mr. Cojuangco said this is possible because, for every 1,000 megawatts installed, a nuclear plant can generate enough power to supply Labrador with twice its total 2021 electricity consumption every year across the facility’s 80-year lifespan.

He added that such a facility could significantly reduce generation charges, leading to lower electricity rates that may help attract investments.

“I think foreign investors and local investors will flock to Labrador to set up their businesses and industries, and it will enable us to create the thousands of jobs necessary to uplift the lives of Labradorans,” Mr. Cojuangco said.

Last year, Mr. Cojuangco, a staunch advocate of nuclear energy, proposed the construction of a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plant in Pangasinan.

The plant’s cost is estimated to be at least P225 billion and will possibly be built within a 120-hectare area.

In previous statements, the lawmaker said electricity from nuclear power could drop to as low as P5 per kilowatt-hour or even provided free to residents of Labrador under certain arrangements.

The municipality has a population of 26,811 based on the 2020 census.

Mr. Cojuangco also said the income tax generated from the nuclear plant could help lift Labrador out of poverty, similar to the nearby town of Sual, which saw revenue gains from hosting a 1,000-MW coal power plant.

Labrador is currently the second-poorest municipality in Pangasinan, he said.

Meanwhile, the Archdiocese of Lingayen-Dagupan voiced opposition to the proposed nuclear plant last weekend, citing that its planned location is near the East Zambales Fault Line, making any nuclear project “an unacceptable risk.”

“Not in Pangasinan! Not anywhere else!” the bishops said in a statement. They also recalled the 2011 Fukushima disaster, which caused significant harm to both lives and the environment.

Mr. Cojuangco stressed that the proposed plant will not be built on top of a fault line and would be engineered to withstand the maximum possible earthquake intensity that the fault could generate.

Amid opposition to nuclear energy, he urged the Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (PNRI) to promote a more positive narrative about its benefits.

PNRI is the country’s primary research and technical agency for nuclear science and technology, responsible for conducting research, providing scientific expertise, and training personnel in the safe and peaceful use of nuclear energy.

Meanwhile, the newly created Philippine Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (PhilATOM) under the recently enacted RA 12305, serves as the independent regulator, overseeing licensing, inspections, and enforcement of nuclear and radiation safety, with PNRI providing technical guidance and support.

The law also includes measures such as the establishment of a national registry for radiation sources, stricter safety protocols, and penalties for unauthorized nuclear activities.

PNRI is leading this year’s Atomic Energy Week from December 9 to 12, highlighting the importance of nuclear science and technology in national development. One of the event’s centerpieces is the open-house technical exhibits, showcasing recent nuclear technologies developed by Filipino scientists and researchers. — Edg Adrian A. Eva

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28