PANews reported on December 11th, citing Bloomberg, that Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Bitcoin finance firm Strategy, publicly criticized a proposal to exclude the company from US indices, calling it "biased" and "harmful." Strategy raised key objections from technical, accounting, and political perspectives regarding MSCI's proposal to remove companies with cryptocurrency holdings exceeding 50% of their total assets. Strategy warned that if MSCI approves the proposal before January 15th, it will have "extremely harmful consequences." Strategy executives argue that the 50% rule "arbitrarily isolates digital asset companies, giving them unfair special treatment," noting similar exposures to oil, timber, and gold, and ignoring price volatility and other core factors in balance sheet accounting. Strategy's core principle is that it differs from investment funds in that it actively uses Bitcoin to generate returns for shareholders, rather than merely as a "package" for the original cryptocurrency, and pursues value creation through technological innovation. Finally, the letter addresses the broader debate surrounding passive investing, stating that the proposal is inconsistent with MSCI's role as a standard-setting body and raises concerns about its index neutrality.PANews reported on December 11th, citing Bloomberg, that Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Bitcoin finance firm Strategy, publicly criticized a proposal to exclude the company from US indices, calling it "biased" and "harmful." Strategy raised key objections from technical, accounting, and political perspectives regarding MSCI's proposal to remove companies with cryptocurrency holdings exceeding 50% of their total assets. Strategy warned that if MSCI approves the proposal before January 15th, it will have "extremely harmful consequences." Strategy executives argue that the 50% rule "arbitrarily isolates digital asset companies, giving them unfair special treatment," noting similar exposures to oil, timber, and gold, and ignoring price volatility and other core factors in balance sheet accounting. Strategy's core principle is that it differs from investment funds in that it actively uses Bitcoin to generate returns for shareholders, rather than merely as a "package" for the original cryptocurrency, and pursues value creation through technological innovation. Finally, the letter addresses the broader debate surrounding passive investing, stating that the proposal is inconsistent with MSCI's role as a standard-setting body and raises concerns about its index neutrality.
Michael Saylor criticized MSCI's plan to exclude companies with high cryptocurrency holdings from its indices.
PANews reported on December 11th, citing Bloomberg, that Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Bitcoin finance firm Strategy, publicly criticized a proposal to exclude the company from US indices, calling it "biased" and "harmful." Strategy raised key objections from technical, accounting, and political perspectives regarding MSCI's proposal to remove companies with cryptocurrency holdings exceeding 50% of their total assets. Strategy warned that if MSCI approves the proposal before January 15th, it will have "extremely harmful consequences."
Strategy executives argue that the 50% rule "arbitrarily isolates digital asset companies, giving them unfair special treatment," noting similar exposures to oil, timber, and gold, and ignoring price volatility and other core factors in balance sheet accounting. Strategy's core principle is that it differs from investment funds in that it actively uses Bitcoin to generate returns for shareholders, rather than merely as a "package" for the original cryptocurrency, and pursues value creation through technological innovation. Finally, the letter addresses the broader debate surrounding passive investing, stating that the proposal is inconsistent with MSCI's role as a standard-setting body and raises concerns about its index neutrality.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Zakt de Bitcoin koers naar $80.000 na de $3 miljard BTC ETF uitstroom sinds november?
Bitcoin laat op dit moment duidelijke signalen zien van afnemende institutionele interesse. De instroom in BTC ETF producten is sterk teruggelopen en ook bedrijven
Share
Coinstats2025/12/13 23:16
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?
Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps
The post Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Reserve has made its first Fed rate cut this year following today’s FOMC meeting, lowering interest rates by 25 basis points (bps). This comes in line with expectations, while the crypto market awaits Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech for guidance on the committee’s stance moving forward. FOMC Makes First Fed Rate Cut This Year With 25 Bps Cut In a press release, the committee announced that it has decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 bps from between 4.25% and 4.5% to 4% and 4.25%. This comes in line with expectations as market participants were pricing in a 25 bps cut, as against a 50 bps cut. This marks the first Fed rate cut this year, with the last cut before this coming last year in December. Notably, the Fed also made the first cut last year in September, although it was a 50 bps cut back then. All Fed officials voted in favor of a 25 bps cut except Stephen Miran, who dissented in favor of a 50 bps cut. This rate cut decision comes amid concerns that the labor market may be softening, with recent U.S. jobs data pointing to a weak labor market. The committee noted in the release that job gains have slowed, and that the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. They added that inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated. Fed Chair Jerome Powell had also already signaled at the Jackson Hole Conference that they were likely to lower interest rates with the downside risk in the labor market rising. The committee reiterated this in the release that downside risks to employment have risen. Before the Fed rate cut decision, experts weighed in on whether the FOMC should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:36