National Bank of Tajikistan admits absence of comprehensive crypto rules
The monetary authority of Tajikistan has explained its conservative stance on cryptocurrencies, issuing a string of familiar sounding warnings and disclaimers.
At the same time, the regulator is inadvertently acknowledging that the negative attitude is not really founded in current law, as the country is yet to regulate its digital assets space.
Tajikistan’s main bank comments on cryptocurrencies and risks
The National Bank of Tajikistan (NBT) has for the first time officially detailed its stance on cryptocurrencies, local media reported.
Answering calls for clarification, the monetary policy regulator assured that all decisions on related matters are “made by the country’s authorities in a balanced and cautious manner,” as quoted by Sputnik Tajikistan.
In a written response received by Radio Ozodi this week, the central bank stated:
It went on to share its belief that cryptocurrencies can be used for “questionable transactions,” due to the inherent anonymity of many transfers.
“Cryptocurrency can be subject to cyberattacks or used for money laundering and terrorist financing,” the NBT pointed out, repeating warnings issued by other financial authorities around the world.
“Given that transactions between cryptocurrency owners take place without the involvement of financial institutions, criminal operations are possible, for example, the sale of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances using virtual money,” the bank added.
Then it put its figure on the key issue – in Tajikistan, cryptocurrency is not officially recognized as a means of exchange and saving, nor as a unit of account.
The regulator also emphasized that all financial transactions in the country should be carried out exclusively in the national currency, the Tajikistani somoni.
A disclaimer followed:
Crypto remains largely unregulated in Tajikistan
The Tajik central bank remarked that the status of cryptocurrency in the country is determined by specific provisions in one of the nation’s laws, without specifying which one.
The legislation allegedly defines virtual assets such as Bitcoin as digital value that can be traded or transferred and used for investment or payment purposes.
The latter statement clearly contradicts the NBT’s earlier insistence that only the national fiat can be used in financial operations, such as the purchase and sale of goods and services.
What’s more, the National Bank acknowledged that the trading of digital assets is not currently regulated in the Central Asian nation, admitting, in essence, that crypto exchange remains outside the legal field.
It elaborated:
Thus, the trading of cryptocurrencies “is not considered a licensed type of financial or non-banking activity and is not subject to regulation,” the financial institution explained.
The National Bank of Tajikistan noted that no cryptocurrency exchanges are currently registered to operate in the country.
It also noted that its comments do not apply to other types of electronic money or state-issued digital currencies. They do not concern traditional securities or other financial assets, either.
Tajikistan has been lagging behind other nations in its region and the wider post-Soviet space in terms of developing crypto regulations and the respective market.
Among them, Kazakhstan, which recently lifted restrictions on mining and legalized crypto turnover, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, which have been active in the stablecoin realm, and Turkmenistan, where crypto mining and trading were legalized.
Instead of trying to catch up with its neighbors, the government in Dushanbe has been lately occupied with prosecuting crypto miners minting coins on stolen electric power. Earlier in December, Tajik authorities announced they are introducing criminal liability and financial penalties for their activities.
Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
You May Also Like
Optum Golf Channel Games Debut In Prime Time
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?
