The post Ripple CTO Reacts to Coinbase Lawsuit Prediction, What Happened? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple CTO David Schwartz joins a discussion on XThe post Ripple CTO Reacts to Coinbase Lawsuit Prediction, What Happened? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple CTO David Schwartz joins a discussion on X

Ripple CTO Reacts to Coinbase Lawsuit Prediction, What Happened?

Ripple CTO David Schwartz joins a discussion on X, bordering on Coinbase’s newly-launched prediction markets.

On Friday, Coinbase revealed it had filed lawsuits in key U.S. states, including Connecticut, Michigan and Illinois. This comes shortly after Coinbase unveiled its prediction markets powered by U.S.-based prediction markets operator Kalshi.

In a systems update on Dec. 17, Coinbase said that it would begin offering its customers the ability to trade event contracts on its platform through a partnership with Kalshi.

Coinbase plans to offer event-contract trading to its customers throughout the United States beginning in January 2026, hence the reason for the lawsuit.

States like Illinois have laws in place that Coinbase says seek to prevent its clients from accessing event contracts, which the cryptocurrency exchange defines as “a type of derivative instrument extensively regulated by federal law that can be traded only on federally registered exchanges in transactions facilitated by federally registered intermediaries.”

Ripple CTO clarifies misconception

Coinbase filed its lawsuit to prevent the unlawful application of gambling laws to event contracts.

An X user predicted that Coinbase might lose its lawsuits, prompting discussion on what truly defines an event contract.

Correcting a misassumption brought up in the X conversation, Schwartz responded, “You’re confusing the contract with the event underlying the contract.”

The Ripple CTO added that “Whether the contract is a derivative depends on the nature of the event underlying it. Event contracts are defined as derivative instruments that enable parties to trade on their predictions about whether a future event which may relate to economics, elections, climate, sports, or anything else of potential commercial consequence will occur.”

In XRP news, XRPL Lending Protocol, a new protocol-native system that enables on-ledger lending for institutions while also allowing XRP holders to earn institutional-grade yield, is underway.

Relevant amendments are expected to enter validator voting in late January 2026, marking a major step toward activating protocol-native credit markets on XRPL.

Source: https://u.today/ripple-cto-reacts-to-coinbase-lawsuit-prediction-what-happened

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0,003127
$0,003127$0,003127
-1,48%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

The post Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Trump’s administration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 01:29
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15