Banks avoided holding XRP due to Basel III rules, which classify it as a high-risk crypto and impose a punitive 1,250% capital requirement. The barrier was regulatoryBanks avoided holding XRP due to Basel III rules, which classify it as a high-risk crypto and impose a punitive 1,250% capital requirement. The barrier was regulatory

Finally Revealed? Why Banks Have Been Unable to Hold XRP, and Why It Is About to Change: Pundit

  • Banks avoided holding XRP due to Basel III rules, which classify it as a high-risk crypto and impose a punitive 1,250% capital requirement.
  • The barrier was regulatory, not technological or demand-related, forcing institutions to avoid or keep XRP exposure off-balance sheet.
  • A potential reclassification could change everything, allowing banks to hold, custody, and use XRP directly.

Crypto pundit Stern Drew has outlined why banks have historically avoided holding XRP on their balance sheets, despite its relevance to cross-border payments. According to Drew, the issue has not been demand or technology, but regulatory capital treatment under Basel III.


Under current Basel III rules, XRP is categorized as a Type 2 crypto exposure, which carries a punitive 1,250% risk weight. In practical terms, this makes holding XRP capital-inefficient for regulated banks.


“For every $1 of XRP exposure, a bank must effectively reserve $12.50 in capital,” Drew explained. This requirement, he argued, makes direct XRP holdings irrational for banks, regardless of the token’s utility or market demand.


Capital Inefficiency Drove Institutional Hesitation

The high risk weighting has forced banks to avoid holding XRP outright, instead relying on off-balance-sheet structures or avoiding exposure altogether. Stern Drew emphasized that this regulatory burden, rather than skepticism about XRP itself, explains years of limited institutional participation.


Under such constraints, even banks interested in XRP-powered settlement solutions faced steep capital penalties, discouraging adoption at the balance-sheet level.


A Potential Regulatory Inflection Point Emerges

According to Drew, the situation may be nearing a turning point. As legal and regulatory clarity around XRP improves, he believes the asset has a credible pathway toward reclassification into a lower-risk category, such as Type 2B or another qualifying exposure under Basel standards.


Such a shift would materially reduce, or potentially eliminate, the current 1,250% risk weight. “If that happens, the math changes overnight,” Drew stated.


Also Read: Will XRP Be a Better Buy Than BTC in 2026? Fool Analyst Gives Insight



What Reclassification Could Unlock for XRP

A lower risk classification would have immediate implications for institutional use. Drew outlined several potential outcomes:


  • XRP would become balance-sheet holdable for banks
  • Institutions could custody, deploy, and settle using XRP without punitive capital requirements
  • Liquidity provisioning could shift from indirect or off-balance-sheet usage to direct institutional ownership

This transition, he argued, would mark a structural change in how banks interact with digital assets.


xrp base ii banks

Source: Stern Drew/X

Why This Is Not About Price Speculation

Stern Drew stressed that the discussion is not centered on short-term price movements. Instead, it focuses on Basel capital mechanics, the regulatory framework that determines whether large-scale institutional capital can flow into an asset.


“These are the same mechanics that decide whether trillions move or stay sidelined,” he noted, underscoring the systemic importance of regulatory classification.


Markets May Be Underestimating the Setup

According to Drew, markets tend to front-run regulatory changes rather than narratives. He suggested that investors may be overlooking the significance of a potential reclassification and its impact on institutional demand. “When capital rules flip, demand doesn’t trickle in; it switches on,” he said.


In Drew’s view, XRP is on a clear path toward becoming a Tier-1 digital asset for global institutions. If regulatory treatment evolves as expected, banks could move from cautious experimentation to full-scale adoption.


For now, the market continues to watch developments around regulatory clarity and capital rules. If those conditions align, the long-standing barriers that made XRP “unholdable” for banks could soon be removed, reshaping institutional demand across the digital asset landscape.


Also Read: Shiba Inu Burn Spike Wipes Out 46M SHIB as Price Tests Key Level


The post Finally Revealed? Why Banks Have Been Unable to Hold XRP, and Why It Is About to Change: Pundit appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001619
$0.00000001619$0.00000001619
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Social engineering kost crypto miljarden in 2025

Social engineering kost crypto miljarden in 2025

De grootste dreiging voor crypto zit niet altijd in bugs of fouten in de code. Vaak gaat het fout bij mensen zelf. Nieuwe cijfers over 2025 laten zien hoe misleiding
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 03:01
Christmas Stocking Stuffers? Don't Ignore These Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Gave Impressive Returns In 2025

Christmas Stocking Stuffers? Don't Ignore These Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Gave Impressive Returns In 2025

Christmas brings cheer, cakes and cozy vibes, but it can also be a perfect time for kicking off investments you may not have considered before.read more
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 03:01
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37