Like Kidlat Tahimik, Dengcoy Miel treats Jose Rizal as less a historical subject than a conceptual hingeLike Kidlat Tahimik, Dengcoy Miel treats Jose Rizal as less a historical subject than a conceptual hinge

Kidlat Tahimik and Dengcoy Miel reimagine a hero that we deserve

2025/12/30 22:22
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

BAGUIO, Philippines – National Artist for Film Kidlat Tahimik’s favorite story of Jose Rizal was when the Spanish government allowed the exhibition of about 40 ethnic Filipinos including Igorots in the Exposición de las Islas Filipinas in the Palacio Cristal in 1887.

In his letter to penpal Ferdinand Blumentritt, Rizal wrote about the racial mockery of Spanish newspapers of the Igorots wearing nothing but G-strings until one of them died of pneumonia.

Let them die, Rizal wrote in frustration until he settled down and said that at least the Igorots live in harmony with nature, not like the Spaniards who had to create a human zoo.

Kidlat, ever playful, said of Rizal: “Beneath his winter coat he wore his bahag.” He had since collected woodcarvings of Rizal (and Bonifacio) wearing a bahag, which he had gifted to some friends.

Kidlat exacted revenge for Rizal in 2021 when he set up his Magellan, Marilyn, Mickey & Fr. Dámaso. 500 Years of Conquistador RockStars, at Palacio de Cristal. He filled up the massive space with assemblages of bululs and other Filipino indigenous figures, Spanish conquistadors, and American pop icons like Mickey Mouse and Marilyn Monroe to create his own postcolonial human zoo.

Kidlat Tahimik woodwork, art, assemblage, Mickey MouseMICKEY. Mickey Mouse chainsawing the Holy Wood, an assemblage by Kidlat Tahimik. Photo by Frank Cimatu

Some of these assemblages were shown at the National Museum and some donated “The Trojan Horse” and “The Galleon” at the Mactan-Cebu International Airport (MCIA) Terminals 1 and 2 to complete a weird circumnavigation of sorts.

His Rizal assemblages, however, were shown during Rizal’s birthday in June at the Baguio Museum. 

Kidlat Tahimik exhibit poster

“Happy Orbit, Pepe,” Kidlat in G-string shouted to the audience. 

Kidlat Tahimik with guestsWIND GODDESS. Kidlat Tahimik with guests and the statues of Inhabian (Ifugao goddess of wind) blowing away Marilyn Monroe. Photo by Frank Cimatu Three-headed Jose RizalDehon Taguyongan’s rendition of a three-headed Rizal. Photo by Frank Cimatu Jose Rizal sculpture, Kidlat TahimikJose Rizal leading the pat-tong or celebratory dance. Photo by Frank Cimatu
‘Kathang Ipis’

Kidlat Tahimik’s exhibit was one of two in Baguio that celebrated Rizal this year. The other one was Dengcoy Miel’s homecoming exhibit last August at the Bencab Museum entitled “Kathang Ipis.” 

Dengcoy MielKATHA. Dengcoy Miel at the opening of his exhibit from August 9 to September 28, 2025 at the Bencab Museum in Baguio. Photo by Frank Cimatu.

Dengcoy, a long-time executive artist of The Strait Times in Singapore, retired and came home this year. 

Like Kidlat, Dengcoy Miel treats Rizal as less a historical subject than a conceptual hinge. The hero becomes a vessel through which questions of power, faith and post-colonial identity can pass. His earlier Rizal portraits like “Rizal in the Land of Lilimut” distill what Miel calls the filibuster spirit of the revolution — defiance sharpened by intellect, resistance fueled not only by arms but by ideas. This is Rizal not as saint, but as provocation, a reminder that dissent is a moral stance as much as a political one.

Dengcoy Miel painting, Jose RizalDengcoy Miel’s “Allergic to Violence”. Photo by Frank Cimatu

In “Kathang Ipis”, he paired Rizal with Bonifacio, and as political taxonomies go, the National Hero was again portrayed as a pacifist. This was evident in his “Allergic to Violence” and “The Pacifist’s Nightmare” where the bolo becomes literally too hot to handle. 

Dengcoy Miel painting, Jose RizalDengcoy Miel’s “The Pacifist Nightmare”. Photo by Frank Cimatu

His obra maestra in the exhibit, “Walang Katapusang Cuento ng Pighati at Pagdurusa (Revolt-In)” has Rizal and Bonifacio locking arms, while their other hands held a smoldering bolo (for Andres) and a flaming quill (for Jose). Rizal’s measured faith in reason, reform, and the slow labor of words seems present in the work’s reflective pauses while Bonifacio’s raw insistence on rupture and action surges through its more violent, unrelenting imagery. The piece refuses to resolve their debate. Instead, it suggests that Philippine grief is born precisely from this tension: the country’s habit of thinking its way out of pain while simultaneously bleeding through it. 

Dengcoy Miel painting, Jose Rizal, Andres Bonifacio Dengcoy Miel’s “Walang Katapusang Cuento ng Pighati at Pagdurusa.” Photo by Frank Cimatu

For Miel, the sorrow continues as the nation is condemned to carry both Rizal’s lucid sorrow and Bonifacio’s furious anguish at the same locked arms.

Kidlat, on the other hand, has Rizal as the supreme “indio-genius,” which is both reclamation and provocation. “Indio,” a colonial slur, is stripped of its insult and fused with intellect, imagination, and resistance. Kidlat always says that it was his late Ifugao friend Lopez Nauyac who taught him that word. Applied to Rizal, the phrase destabilizes the hero’s usual pedestal. Rizal is no longer simply the product of European enlightenment; he becomes a bridge figure, fluent in Western forms yet anchored in native consciousness. Therefore, with a bahag. 

He imagined Rizal holding a pen in one hand, like Miel, and a camera in the other. The pairing feels autobiographical, of course. 

What distinguishes both Kidlat and Dengcoy are their refusal of piety. Kidlat’s Rizal protests human zoos, mocks friars, and lingers uncomfortably in the present, where memory is crowded out by noise and novelty. By framing Rizal as inspiration rather than icon, Kidlat argues for a living relationship with history. 

Miel plays the dyslexic. He said that Kathang Ipis was, of course, a play of isip and he played with it. 

“Why Kathang Ipis? Probably because our points of view are that of the underling, of men and women still being haunted by the dark shadows of our past. It’s these puns intended that reveals our playful and merry acceptance and shielded defiance to the challenges of the past, present and the future,” he said during the opening. 

“The paintings in this show hope to crystallize our collective traumas, make peace with them and hopefully learn from them, too.” 

In revisiting Rizal, Miel, the balikbayan, was also revisiting himself, asking the question that underlies much of his art: not only what Rizal means to Filipinos today, but whether, in an age of distraction and self-inflicted myths, they still deserve him. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Wink Logo
Wink Price(LIKE)
$0.001703
$0.001703$0.001703
+0.82%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

SEC approves Grayscale’s multi-crypto fund with XRP, SOL and ADA

GDLC's approval coincides with SEC adopting generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which would expedite the launch process.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 10:26