SARASOTA, Fla., Jan. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimate Motorsport, a high-volume independent dealership, was facing a challenge familiar to many growing stores: risingSARASOTA, Fla., Jan. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimate Motorsport, a high-volume independent dealership, was facing a challenge familiar to many growing stores: rising

How Ultimate Motorsport Uses AutoRaptor AI to Sell 85-100 Cars a Month With Just Three Salespeople

SARASOTA, Fla., Jan. 6, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Ultimate Motorsport, a high-volume independent dealership, was facing a challenge familiar to many growing stores: rising lead volume, limited staff capacity, and no scalable way to maintain consistent follow-up. Despite receiving 1,000+ leads per month, their four-person sales team struggled to respond quickly or nurture leads over time.

After evaluating multiple AI tools, including Podium, Intel AI, and standalone chatbots, the dealership selected AutoRaptor’s AI Sales Assistant (AISA) because it integrates directly with their CRM, leverages years of customer data, and offers exceptional customization and backend control.

Today, Ultimate Motorsport sells 85–100 vehicles per month with just three salespeople, all while improving engagement, reactivating dormant leads, and generating more appointments with no additional overhead.

The Challenge: Heavy lead volume, small team, missed opportunities

Before using AutoRaptor’s AI, follow-up was the dealership’s biggest pain point.

“The biggest frustration was follow-up… we get close to 1,000 leads a month with four sales guys.”

Because leads were priced aggressively, demand was high, but the team could only follow up for a few days before falling behind.

“My guys were following up maybe five days out… it became almost impossible to keep up with the volume unless you added more salespeople.”

Adding more staff wasn’t an option; it hurt commissions, created internal competition, and didn’t fix the core problem: too many leads, not enough time.

The Solution: Choosing AutoRaptor’s AI Sales Assistant

Omar compared several AI platforms and found that most were expensive, rigid, or required replacing his existing systems.

Podium:

  • Tried to take over the entire workflow (phone, CRM, AI).
  • Offered low intro pricing that would later increase.
  • Provided little backend control.

Intel AI:

  • Good technology but required switching CRMs, which was double the cost.
  • Migrating years of customer data would be painful and risky.

Standalone Chatbots:

  • Poor adoption because most leads come from third-party marketplaces, not the website.

AutoRaptor offered the opposite:

  • Seamless integration with their existing CRM
  • Access to years of CRM data (20,000+ customers)
  • Ability to train and customize AI behavior
  • No need to overhaul existing systems

AutoRaptor was our preferred CRM… and AutoRaptor’s AI is better than Intel and Podium.”

The Implementation: AI trained to match the dealership’s tone, rules, and sales process

Ultimate Motorsports connected AISA to:

  • New leads
  • Old leads going back 4–12 months
  • Missed calls
  • Upsheets and existing CRM notes

Their team trained the AI gradually:

“It’s not plug-and-play. You have to shape how AI works and thinks.”

They adjusted wording, rules, hold policies, and fallback responses to match real dealership operations. The result? AI that feels like part of the team.

“It’s not cookie cutter… it answers, suggests, compliments, and stays in our tone.”

The Results

1. Huge efficiency gains — no extra headcount needed

Before AI:

  • Needed more staff to manage leads
  • Risked oversaturating the sales floor

After AI:
 → Running the store with 3 salespeople selling up to 100 cars/month

“We sell 85–100 cars a month with three sales guys.”

2. Re-engaged dormant leads = new revenue

AISA revived leads that were 3–12 months old, customers who may be ready to buy now.

“If a customer wasn’t ready to buy 4 months ago, he may be ready now.”

This created a new “hidden” pipeline without buying new lead sources.

3. Faster responses = more appointments

AISA replies instantly, even while reps are typing.

“AISA will answer the customer within a minute… it’s setting appointments for in-person or FaceTime video.”

4. Better lead filtering

AI automatically filters out unqualified shoppers, reducing noise and improving focus.

“If someone doesn’t respond to one or two messages, that’s not a customer… that’s a window shopper.”

5. Strong ROI

Just five extra deals per month pays for the system several times over.

“If you can close five more deals… that’s $10,000 gross. ROI is off the charts.”

Compared to buying new lead sources: “CarGurus or Autotrader want at least $2,500/mo… AISA is cheaper and uses the data we already have.”

Why AutoRaptor?

1. Unmatched customization: Make rule changes instantly, no ticketing system.

“If I can go in there and make changes myself… that’s what I love.”

2. Deep CRM integration: AI leverages old upsheets, call logs, notes, customer history.

3. Real dealership language: AISA adapts to the dealership’s tone, not cookie-cutter templates.

4. Competitive necessity: Large groups have massive AI budgets. Independent dealerships need tools that level the field.

“If you’re not playing at the same level… they will crowd you out.”

The Conclusion

AutoRaptor’s AI Sales Assistant helped Ultimate Motorsport:

  • Handle 1,000+ monthly leads
  • Sell 85–100 cars each month
  • Operate with just three salespeople
  • Reactivate older leads
  • Improve response time
  • Reduce overhead
  • And achieve off-the-charts ROI

For independent dealerships facing rising lead volume and competitive pressure, AutoRaptor’s AI Sales Assistant represents a modern, scalable solution that delivers measurable outcomes, immediately and long term.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/how-ultimate-motorsport-uses-autoraptor-ai-to-sell-85100-cars-a-month-with-just-three-salespeople-302654273.html

SOURCE AutoRaptor

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0,03921
$0,03921$0,03921
-%0,93
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst

The post SUI Price Eyes Breakout, Targets $11 Says Analyst appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SUI price shows a technical setup for a macro breakout with analyst Dan Gambardello targeting $10-$11 levels. Recent partnership with Google’s Agentic Payments Protocol adds fundamental support to the technical analysis as SUI moves closer to potential breakout levels. SUI Price Analysis Points to $10-$11 Breakout Target Dan Gambardello has identified a clear ascending triangle formation on SUI price daily chart with upside targets around $10.79. The analyst simplified this target range to $10-$11 for practical trading purposes. The pattern shows sustained higher lows meeting resistance at current levels before a potential breakout. VanEck maintains more aggressive SUI crypto targets ranging from $13-$25 according to Gambardello’s research. SUI Price Analysis | Source: Dan Gambardello, X The $10 level is a more conservative higher high area for the current cycle. Midterm targets point to $7.50 in the 1.618 Fibonacci extension zone before longer-term objectives. The monthly RSI shows extreme compression that Gambardello describes as “screaming for a macro breakout to the upside.” This momentum oscillator behavior typically precedes major price movements in the crypto market. SUI crypto risk model currently sits at 51 and matches pre-bull market levels seen in coins like Ethereum. Gambardello compared this to Ethereum’s December 2020 reading of 51 before its major breakout. The March 2017 Ethereum reading of 53 preceded that cycle’s parabolic move. The analyst also noted that SUI price trades near the same levels from almost a year ago in November 2024. Bollinger Bands Signal Historic Compression CryptoBullet has identified the tightest Bollinger Bands in SUI’s entire trading history on the weekly chart. The BBW indicator compression reached levels that were historically followed by major price movements. This setup mirrors conditions before SUI’s previous major rallies. Historical data shows SUI price delivered +253% gains between December 2023 and March 2024 following similar compression. SUI…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:32
How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever

How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever

The post How Zero Knowledge Proof Is Changing Blockchain Performance Forever appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects Learn how Zero Knowledge Proof
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/13 04:11