TLDR Senators move to ban passive stablecoin yields and boost activity-based rewards. Draft bill adds key protections for non-custodial blockchain developers. BipartisanTLDR Senators move to ban passive stablecoin yields and boost activity-based rewards. Draft bill adds key protections for non-custodial blockchain developers. Bipartisan

Senators Move to Ban Passive Stablecoin Yields as Crypto Bill Nears Showdown

TLDR

  • Senators move to ban passive stablecoin yields and boost activity-based rewards.
  • Draft bill adds key protections for non-custodial blockchain developers.
  • Bipartisan backing grows for strict yield rules ahead of Senate markup.
  • New framework reshapes stablecoin policy as regulators target passive returns.
  • Crypto markets eye clarity as Congress advances sweeping digital asset rules.

U.S. senators advanced new rules that restrict stablecoin yield programs and set a clear policy path for digital assets. The draft bill bans passive stablecoin yield while permitting activity-linked rewards that support measurable engagement. The move signals a decisive shift as lawmakers prepare the bill for a key committee markup.

Stablecoin Restrictions Gain Bipartisan Backing

Senate leaders placed the passive stablecoin yield ban at the center of the updated framework, and they framed it as a structural safeguard. The draft bars digital asset platforms from paying stablecoin yield for balances held without activity, yet it still allows rewards tied to defined actions. The text aligns with a recent proposal that limited returns unless users traded, staked, or supplied collateral.

Banking groups argued that passive stablecoin yield programs create liquidity concerns, and they urged Congress to close remaining gaps. Crypto firms countered that the GENIUS Act already resolved this issue, but lawmakers still enforced new limits on stablecoin yield for account balances. However, exchanges can continue offering rewards when customers trigger transactions or provide liquidity.

Credit unions also supported ending passive stablecoin yield programs, and they joined banks in calling for tighter rules. Their position influenced the final draft, and it strengthened the case for a unified approach. As a result, senators presented a policy that keeps activity-based incentives while removing passive returns.

Developer Protections Added to the Framework

Lawmakers inserted new language that protects software developers who do not control user funds, and it mirrors earlier bipartisan work. The measure shields developers from treatment as financial intermediaries and affirms their role in non-custodial systems. Furthermore, the provision brings clarity to code maintenance and infrastructure support.

Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden shaped these protections, and their language now appears in the Banking Committee draft. Their framework sets boundaries between code creation and regulated financial activity. Therefore, technical contributors gain a standard that limits exposure to compliance rules.

The update arrives as the broader bill moves toward a Thursday markup, and it resolves several pending disputes. Committees must later align this version with a separate Agriculture Committee proposal. After that step, negotiators will compare the bill with the House’s Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.

Market Impact and Legislative Path Ahead

Digital assets traded slightly higher as anticipation for the bill increased, and major tokens saw modest gains. Analysts said approval could reduce uncertainty, and they expect a stronger market response if the bill advances. Yet traders held positions steady while awaiting new inflation data.

Prediction markets now assign a high chance of enactment and they suggest strong momentum for federal action. Passage could lift market confidence, and it may influence demand for bitcoin and other assets. Still, the final bill must clear both chambers before reaching the president.

The Senate will decide how to merge the competing frameworks, and timing remains critical as negotiations continue. Any delay could shift the debate, but committee leaders aim to maintain progress. As the showdown approaches, the passive stablecoin yield ban remains the central policy shift.

The post Senators Move to Ban Passive Stablecoin Yields as Crypto Bill Nears Showdown appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.03508
$0.03508$0.03508
0.00%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Markets await Fed’s first 2025 cut, experts bet “this bull market is not even close to over”

Will the Fed’s first rate cut of 2025 fuel another leg higher for Bitcoin and equities, or does September’s history point to caution? First rate cut of 2025 set against a fragile backdrop The Federal Reserve is widely expected to…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 00:27
Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Buterin pushes Layer 2 interoperability as cornerstone of Ethereum’s future

Ethereum founder, Vitalik Buterin, has unveiled new goals for the Ethereum blockchain today at the Japan Developer Conference. The plan lays out short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals touching on L2 interoperability and faster responsiveness among others. In terms of technology, he said again that he is sure that Layer 2 options are the best way […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 01:15