THE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extraditionTHE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extradition

Philippines seeks legal paths to bring flood scam suspect back from Portugal

By Chloe Mari A. Hufana, Reporter

THE Philippines is examining all legal options to bring home one of the alleged masterminds behind a multibillion-peso flood control scandal, as a formal extradition bid is unlikely without a treaty with Portugal, Interior Secretary Juanito Victor C. Remulla said on Tuesday.

President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. has ordered government agencies to study alternative avenues to repatriate former Party-list Rep. Elizaldy S. Co, Mr. Remulla said, citing approaches that could avoid the lengthy process of negotiating an extradition agreement with Lisbon.

“We are studying it because the situation is complicated,” he told reporters via teleconference in mixed English and Filipino. “We don’t have an extradition treaty with Portugal.”

Among the options being explored are coordination with international bodies such as the International Criminal Police Organization, or Interpol, and the United Nations, he said.

Negotiating an extradition treaty is not being prioritized, Mr. Remulla added, noting that such agreements typically take years to conclude and ratify.

“A treaty will take too long,” he said. “That’s why the instruction is to study other ways to do this.”

Mr. Co, who used to head the House of Representatives appropriations committee, has been linked to irregularities in government-funded flood control projects.

Investigators have flagged, among others, a P289.5-million flood control project in Oriental Mindoro implemented by the Department of Public Works and Highways.

Authorities have issued a warrant of arrest against Mr. Co for graft and malversation of public funds.

Mr. Remulla said officials are reviewing all possible mechanisms, including repatriation, while acknowledging that returning a suspect from a country without an extradition framework poses significant legal challenges.

“We will look at all avenues — and when we say all, we mean all — to make this happen,” he said.

Asked whether the case could mirror the return of former Negros Oriental Congressman Arnolfo A. Teves, Jr. from Timor-Leste, Mr. Remulla said that outcome hinged on a special accommodation by Timor-Leste’s president following direct talks with Mr. Marcos.

He said he was not aware of any comparable understanding between Manila and Lisbon.

“Extradition is almost impossible because we don’t have a treaty,” he said. “But there are other avenues we are studying so we can get him.”

The government’s focus is securing Mr. Co’s return rather than pursuing a formal extradition process, he added.

Josue Raphael J. Cortez, a diplomacy lecturer at the De La Salle-College of St. Benilde’s School of Diplomacy and Governance, said extradition requires a formal treaty and cannot rely solely on goodwill between states.

Extradition requires a treaty between countries that share common interests in combating similar crimes, he said in a Facebook Messenger chat. Acts must be criminal in both jurisdictions to qualify, while political and religious offenses are excluded under international law, he added.

Mr. Cortez said treaty negotiations typically begin with presidential approval and often take years, as governments work to balance legal standards and national interests.

“After rigorous negotiations and back-and-forth discussions on the provisions, in the case of the Philippines, we will have to secure the concurrence of the Legislature, particularly a two-thirds majority of the Senate, for such a treaty to take effect,” he said.

The case adds pressure on the Marcos administration to show progress in holding officials accountable for alleged misuse of public funds, particularly as flood control spending has come under heightened scrutiny following last year’s corruption revelations.

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.001101
$0.001101$0.001101
-0.72%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF price reclaims 200-day moving average

WIF (WIF) price is entering a critical technical phase as price action reclaims the 200-day moving average, a level that often separates bearish control from bullish
Share
Crypto.news2026/01/13 23:44
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Trump: Powell did a bad job.

Trump: Powell did a bad job.

PANews reported on January 13th that, according to Jinshi Data, US President Trump stated: "Federal Reserve Chairman Powell is either incompetent or dishonest.
Share
PANews2026/01/13 23:40