Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) has been a volatile ride for investors in the trailing 12 months, but a Goldman Sachs analyst warns that downside momentumSuper Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) has been a volatile ride for investors in the trailing 12 months, but a Goldman Sachs analyst warns that downside momentum

Goldman Sachs explains why SMCI stock price nightmare isn’t over yet

2026/01/14 00:30
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Super Micro Computer Inc (NASDAQ: SMCI) has been a volatile ride for investors in the trailing 12 months, but a Goldman Sachs analyst warns that downside momentum is set to continue in 2026.

On Tuesday, Katherine Murphy initiated coverage of the artificial intelligence (AI) server company with a “sell” rating, saying its shares could tumble further to $26 through the end of this year.

The investment firm’s bearish note is exerting significant pressure on SMCI stock, which is down 7% at the time of writing.

Why Goldman Sachs recommends selling Supermicro stock

Supermicro shares have successfully alleviated delisting risk, but that alone doesn’t make it a sound long-term investment, according to Katherine Murphy.

In a research note today, the Goldman Sachs analyst said “limited visibility into profitability” could make it difficult for the AI server specialist to push higher from current levels in 2026.

SMCI’s margins have “halved in the last three years to 9.5%” as it continued to sign large, margin-dilutive deals – and Murphy does not expect that to change anytime soon.

In other words, the investment firm believes Super Micro Computer’s margins could shrink further in the months ahead.

SMCI shares may tumble further as margins continue to shrink

According to Katherine Murphy, Supermicro will likely remain “a leader in the AI server market in the medium term.”

Still, she recommends cutting exposure to SMCI shares as the company depends rather heavily on a single supplier (making up 64% of what it sells).

In fact, the Nasdaq-listed firm drives much of its business from a small group of big customers, which means it doesn’t really have much control over pricing.

Additionally, the Goldman Sachs analyst isn’t particularly excited about Super Micro Computer’s commitment to evolve into a platform name, offering both hardware and software for data centres.

Why? Because software makes up less than 2% of its revenue currently, it suggests the company doesn’t have much of a software foundation to build on.

Plus, it has just 705 employees in the software team compared with Dell’s more than 50,000. This would make it increasingly difficult for SMCI to compete at scale or reach as many customers, she concluded.

SMCI’s technicals are just as concerning in 2026

While Goldman Sachs is concerned primarily about SMCI’s fundamentals, its technicals aren’t any better either.

The sell-off on Jan. 13 pushed Supermicro stock decisively below a key support, coinciding with its 20-day moving average (MA) at the $30 level, indicating bearish momentum may accelerate in the near-term.

Meanwhile, options traders see an even dire picture for Super Micro Computer in the months ahead.

According to Barchart, contracts expiring mid-May have the lower price set at about $20 currently, signalling potential for another 30% decline from here.

The post Goldman Sachs explains why SMCI stock price nightmare isn't over yet appeared first on Invezz

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006513
$0.006513$0.006513
0.00%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Pi Network Community Leadership Program Opens Doors for New GCV Ambassadors

Pi Network Community Leadership Program Opens Doors for New GCV Ambassadors

    The Pi Network community is entering another stage of organizational development as new opportunities emerge for p
Share
Hokanews2026/03/15 22:16
U.S. Congressman Tells Senate to Pass House Crypto Bill or Step Aside – Inside the Clarity Act Standoff

U.S. Congressman Tells Senate to Pass House Crypto Bill or Step Aside – Inside the Clarity Act Standoff

Key Takeaways: Rep. French Hill is pushing the Senate to adopt the House-passed Clarity Act to break the stablecoin deadlock […] The post U.S. Congressman Tells
Share
Coindoo2026/03/15 22:15