If Europe succeeds in this endeavor, it will be proof that it’s possible to enjoy global connectivity without the double-edged sword that is globalization.If Europe succeeds in this endeavor, it will be proof that it’s possible to enjoy global connectivity without the double-edged sword that is globalization.

The EU is winning the data center race as hyperscalers lose ground | Opinion

6 min read

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

The next decade is going to be defined by a return to regionalism as citizens grow weary of foreign wars, international tariffs, and wonder what they’ll pay at the pump the following day based on seemingly arbitrary events in far-flung lands. As the U.S. begins to focus more on domestic concerns, the post-globalization era is underway.

Like all new eras, the break with the past won’t be clean; a century of world policing is a habit that isn’t broken easily, and the U.S. remains susceptible to getting dragged into global conflicts. The difference is that now it’s doing so reluctantly rather than racing in gung-ho.

As the U.S. retreats behind the blanket of protectionism, many of its Big Tech companies are also being squeezed out of regions where they once reigned supreme. It’s a trend that is particularly evident in Europe, where a radical shakeup of the cloud computing landscape is underway.

Hyperscalers scale down

Hyperscalers that operate massive cloud computing and data center infrastructure have dominated the European market, just as they have in most global regions, for well over a decade. Amazon (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and Meta are the giants whose economies of scale allow them to undercut local competition and gain a vice-like grip over the cloud computing landscape. But suddenly, that grip is weakening.

The U.S. determination to go it alone, without the baggage of its global allies to subsidize, cuts both ways. Its partners have begun to question what they’ve been getting out of the deal, both politically and commercially. For years, Europe has voiced concerns over its reliance on the U.S. tech giants for cloud services, citing risks to data sovereignty and economic independence.

Now, the continent is acting decisively in a concerted pushback against U.S. hegemony. If they want to impose punitive trade tariffs and retreat across the Atlantic, let it, runs the reasoning. Europeans have already been given a harsh lesson in reliance on foreign resources with the Ukraine war, which has cut Russia from the supply line and sent EU energy prices soaring. 

In a world of uncertainty, the only certainty is to rely on yourself, which means turning to the domestic market to ramp up production of everything from renewables to data centers.

Bringing it back home

The EU’s push for data center sovereignty has been heightened by rising recognition of the vulnerabilities tied to centralized cloud providers. Data stored with U.S.-based hyperscalers is subject to American laws, such as the CLOUD Act, which can compel companies to hand over data regardless of where it’s stored. The U.S. Big Tech, like AWS, is making a show of establishing Europe-based supposedly regionally sovereign operations, but few are convinced. 

High-profile incidents, like the 2023 Schrems III ruling, concerning longstanding tensions between EU privacy standards and U.S. surveillance laws, further exposed the fragility of transatlantic data transfers. Add to this the unpredictable political climate in the U.S., where regulatory shifts can disrupt business overnight, and it’s no wonder Europe is seeking alternatives.

Contrast this with the EU’s approach. The bloc has doubled down on initiatives like Gaia-X, a framework for data sovereignty, and stricter GDPR enforcement, which prioritizes user privacy. But the real game-changer is the EU’s openness to innovative models. Regional cloud providers are gaining traction, supported by policies that incentivize local data storage and processing.

Foreign direct investment from non-U.S. players, particularly those based in Asia and the Middle East, is pouring into European data centers, with countries like Germany and the Netherlands emerging as hubs. This influx is not just about capital – it’s about diversifying the technological and geopolitical risks of over-reliance on a single market.

Decentralizing data

One consequence of the EU’s search for U.S. alternatives is that it’s sparked interest in a technology that is, in many respects, the antithesis of the hyperscaler. Decentralized networks are now in vogue. Unlike traditional hyperscalers, which concentrate data in massive, centralized facilities, decentralized networks distribute resources across multiple nodes. 

As a result, these decentralized cloud systems are less vulnerable to single points of failure, be it from cyberattacks, natural disasters, or political interference.

Prominent investors, including Finnish electronics firm Nokia, have recognized this potential and are now pouring capital into decentralized cloud infrastructure. Once a titan in mobile phones, Nokia has reinvented itself as a key player in cloud computing, betting on solutions that prioritize security and scalability over centralized control.

This decentralized approach aligns with Europe’s broader digital strategy. In forming a network of interconnected, regionally managed data centers, the EU is building a cloud ecosystem that balances local control with global reach. 

For enterprises, this means faster, more secure access to data without the latency issues of transcontinental transfers. For governments, it ensures compliance with stringent privacy laws. And for innovators—think AI startups or gaming studios—it offers a flexible alternative to the rigid pricing models of hyperscalers.

The times they are a-changing

Critics claim that European providers lack the scale to compete and that regional solutions risk fragmenting the global internet. But this view underestimates the momentum behind Europe’s strategy. Its data centers now rival U.S. facilities in efficiency and capacity, while the idea that local solutions lead to fragmentation ignores the reality of modern cloud architecture.

Decentralized systems are designed to interoperate, ensuring seamless connectivity across borders. Far from isolating Europe, this approach strengthens its position as a global digital leader, attracting businesses wary of U.S. regulatory unpredictability. The EU’s focus on open standards and community-driven innovation also counters the monopolistic tendencies of hyperscalers, fostering competition that benefits end-users.

While U.S. hyperscalers still dominate, their grip is loosening as Europe builds a cloud ecosystem that’s not just competitive but shock-proof. By embracing regionalization and decentralization, the EU is not only reducing its dependence on foreign tech giants but setting a global standard for what the cloud can and should be: open, resilient, and immune to the whims of foreign powers. If Europe succeeds in this endeavor, it will be proof that it’s possible to enjoy global connectivity without the double-edged sword that is globalization.

Kai Wawrzinek
Kai Wawrzinek

Kai Wawrzinek is a co-founder of the Impossible Cloud & Impossible Cloud Network. He is a seasoned entrepreneur with a Ph.D. in Law and a proven track record of building successful ventures. Recognizing the need for enterprise-grade solutions in the web3 space, Kai founded Impossible Cloud Network (ICN), a decentralized cloud platform aimed at creating a decentralized alternative to AWS. Before ICN, Kai founded Goodgame Studios, an online game company, and grew the company to over 1,000 employees and generated more than €1 billion in revenue, taking it public on Nasdaq in 2018 through a reverse merger. 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07