Governance proposal IIP-617 on the Injective network passed with 99.89% support. This proposal could reduce the INJ token supply and boost buybacks to further shrinkGovernance proposal IIP-617 on the Injective network passed with 99.89% support. This proposal could reduce the INJ token supply and boost buybacks to further shrink

Bullish: New Injective Governance Vote Could Slash $INJ Supply By Half

  • Governance proposal IIP-617 on the Injective network passed with 99.89% support.
  • This proposal could reduce the INJ token supply and boost buybacks to further shrink it.
  • Despite market dips, Injective is attracting major partners like Deutsche Telekom and Korea University.

The Injective community recently approved a plan to slash the Injective token supply. This governance vote stands as a major change in how the network manages its native token. 

Backers of the governance vote hope that by reducing the number of new tokens entering the market and increasing the rate at which existing ones are destroyed, price stability could enter the picture.

The New Injective Token Supply Management

The passing of proposal IIP-617 (often called the Supply Squeeze) is expected to change some of the major rules controlling how many INJ tokens are created.

This is important because before this vote, the network used a more traditional schedule for issuance. Now, however, the protocol will tighten those numbers and hopefully make INJ one of the most deflationary assets in the blockchain space.

Notably, validators and stakers were strongly united during this process, as nearly 100% of voters backed the change. 

Strengthening the Buyback and Burn Program

A major part of this new system involves the Community BuyBack program. This is expected to take some of the revenue generated by the network and buy more INJ from the open market. 

Once these tokens are purchased, they will then be permanently “burned” or removed from circulation. This process ensures the asset continues to shrink in supply over time rather than growing indefinitely.

The network has already proven that this model works. 

Since its launch, Injective has burned about $6.85 million, and the new rules will speed up this pace. 

Some Market Challenges

This new governance vote is also interesting because it occurred during a difficult period for altcoins.

Over the past year, the market price of INJ has declined, and now sits well below its all-time highs. Market data from CoinGecko shows that the token struggled to maintain its footing even after the vote passed.

Even worse, the price dipped roughly 10% alongside the rest of the market after the announcement.

Activity on the blockchain has also cooled down somewhat. Total value locked (TVL) on Injective is currently at around $18.67 million, and this is a noticeable decline from its previous highs above $60 million. 

However, community members on social media seem optimistic, as many view these changes for their long-term benefit.

In any case, fixing the supply dynamics now will pay off sooner or later, when market interest returns.

Growth in Institutional Support and Security

While the price is still struggling, Injective continues to grow its professional network. 

The protocol has recently added several major validators to help secure the chain, including Deutsche Telekom MMS and even Korea University. 

These additions show that despite the price slowdown, serious organisations are still interested in the technology behind Injective.

INJ continues to show strength despite the recent declinesINJ continues to show strength despite the recent declines | source: TradingView

So far, traders are keeping an eye on the $4.50 support level because the charts show that, despite the overall trend being bearish, the asset is stabilising. 

The Relative Strength Index shows that the token is not yet in oversold territory, which means that there is room for movement in either direction.

The post Bullish: New Injective Governance Vote Could Slash $INJ Supply By Half appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Injective Logo
Injective Price(INJ)
$4.54
$4.54$4.54
-2.00%
USD
Injective (INJ) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37