The post Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion All-Cash Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Netflix on Tuesday announced it has revisedThe post Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion All-Cash Offer appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Netflix on Tuesday announced it has revised

Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion All-Cash Offer

Topline

Netflix on Tuesday announced it has revised its bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s studios and streaming business into an all-cash offer in an apparent effort to fend off Paramount Skydance’s hostile bid to acquire Warner.

Netflix’s modified bid now offers all WBD share holders $27.75 per share entirely in cash for Warner’s studio and streaming business.

Anadolu via Getty Images

Key Facts

In a press release, Netflix said its $83 billion cash-and-stock deal to acquire Warner’s studio and streaming business—including HBO Max—has been altered to an all-cash offer.

The streaming giant said this would offer “enhanced certainty” to Warner’s shareholders who no longer have to be concerned about Netflix’s fluctuating stock price.

The company said its revised offer will allow the deal to move faster, and it expects WBD shareholders to vote on it by April 2026.

Netflix’s original bid, which was approved by Warner’s board, offered each WBD shareholder $23.25 in cash and $4.50 worth of shares of Netflix common stock for each WBD stock they owned.

Under the revised terms, WBD’s shareholders will receive $27.75 per share they own in cash if the deal is approved.

What Do We Know About Paramount’s Offer?

In December, a few days after Netflix’s deal was announced, Paramount Skydance announced it was mounting a hostile bid and offering $108 billion to acquire all of WBD’s assets, including its TV business, which is set to be spun off before the Netflix deal is completed. Paramount’s offer valued the whole of Warner Bros. Discovery at $30 per share. Paramount’s bid was an all-cash offer—something the David Ellison led company argued made its deal superior. Later in December, WBD’s board urged the company’s shareholders to reject Paramount’s offer, calling it “inferior” to Netflix’s. Warner’s board pointed out that the hostile bid included a $40.65 billion equity offer for which “there is no Ellison family commitment of any kind.” In response, Paramount issued a revised bid a few days later, which included an “irrevocable” financial backing of $40 billion from Larry Ellison, the Paramount CEO’s billionaire father. Despite this, Warner’s leaders once again urged shareholders to reject the bid earlier this month.

Tangent

If the Netflix deal is approved by its shareholders, WBD will move forward with its plan to split the company into two entities. The Warner Bros. arm which will be acquired by Netflix includes, the company’s TV and film studio businesses—including Warner Bros. Television, Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group and DC Studios—along with its streaming platform HBO Max. Discovery Global will be spun off into a separate publicly traded company that will include the company’s television networks, including CNN, TNT, Discovery and others.

What To Watch For

Last week, Paramount announced it was moving forward with its hostile bid and launching a proxy fight for WBD’s board. The CBS-owner said it would be nominating directors to the WBD’s board who would be willing to engage with Paramount’s offer. The Ellison-led company said it will also challenge the Netflix deal if Warner’s board seeks a vote on it before the shareholder meeting.

Further Reading

Larry Ellison Guarantees $40 Billion In Paramount’s Warner Bros. Discovery Bid (Forbes)

Paramount Launches Proxy Fight For Control Of Warner Bros. Discovery (Forbes)

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2026/01/20/netflix-revises-warner-bros-deal-to-83-billion-all-cash-offer-to-fend-off-paramount/

Market Opportunity
CreatorBid Logo
CreatorBid Price(BID)
$0.01718
$0.01718$0.01718
-2.71%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37