Netflix on Tuesday sweetened its bid for major parts of Warner Bros. Discovery, shifting to an all-cash offer in a move that sharpens its battle with rival suitorNetflix on Tuesday sweetened its bid for major parts of Warner Bros. Discovery, shifting to an all-cash offer in a move that sharpens its battle with rival suitor

Netflix revises Warner Bros Discovery takeover to all-cash deal, WBD board approves

Netflix on Tuesday sweetened its bid for major parts of Warner Bros. Discovery, shifting to an all-cash offer in a move that sharpens its battle with rival suitor Paramount and accelerates the path toward a shareholder vote.

The Warner Bros. Discovery board has approved Netflix’s revised proposal, which raises the cash component offered to shareholders while maintaining the overall deal value at about $72 billion.

Terms of Netflix’s revised bid

Under the revised terms, Netflix will pay $27.75 per share in cash, replacing its earlier offer of $23.25 in cash and $4.50 in Netflix common stock per share.

While the structure has changed, the headline value of the transaction remains roughly $72 billion.

Netflix executives said the move was aimed at simplifying the deal and offering greater certainty to Warner shareholders.

Netflix’s modified offer would provide “greater financial certainty” for shareholders, added Ted Sarandos, the co-chief executive of Netflix.

Greg Peters, Netflix’s other co-CEO, said the revised agreement demonstrates the streamer’s commitment to the transaction and should help accelerate the process for Warner shareholders weighing competing offers.

“Today’s revised merger agreement brings us even closer to combining two of the greatest storytelling companies in the world,” David Zaslav, the chief executive of Warner Bros. Discovery, said in a statement.

Warner Bros. Discovery disclosed the changes in a preliminary proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will now review the document.

Warner said it expects the revised structure to allow shareholders to vote on the deal by April, a timeline that could prove critical as Paramount continues to apply pressure.

The simplified cash-only offer may appeal to investors who had concerns about the volatility of Netflix’s share price and the complexity of the earlier stock component.

Paramount keeps up the pressure

Netflix’s move comes as Paramount, led by chief executive David Ellison, continues to pursue Warner with a rival all-cash proposal.

Paramount has offered about $108 billion for the entire Warner Bros. Discovery group, or roughly $30 a share, and has made clear it is prepared to take its case directly to shareholders.

Earlier this month, Paramount said it planned to launch a proxy fight for seats on the Warner board.

Last week, it also filed a lawsuit seeking to force Warner to release more detailed information about its deal with Netflix, though a judge declined to expedite the case.

The legal skirmishes and rival bids have turned the contest into one of the most closely watched corporate battles in the global media industry.

Valuing the cable business

A key difference between the two offers lies in how they treat Warner’s traditional television assets.

Under Netflix’s proposal, Warner will carve out its cable networks, including CNN, TNT, and Food Network, into a separate publicly traded company.

Warner argues this structure allows shareholders to retain exposure to potential upside in the cable business, an argument Paramount has rejected.

Paramount has said it believes the carved-out business has little to no value.

In its latest filing on Tuesday, Warner also detailed how it values the cable unit, with estimates ranging from $1.33 to $6.86 a share.

That implied value would be added to Netflix’s $27.75-per-share cash offer for the rest of the company, a calculation Warner hopes will help investors compare the competing bids.

Financial outlook for networks

Warner also disclosed financial projections for its global networks business over the next five years.

The company expects the unit to generate about $17 billion in revenue and $5.4 billion in adjusted Ebitda in 2026.

By 2030, those figures are projected to decline to $15.6 billion and $3.8 billion, reflecting ongoing pressure on traditional television.

CNN was the only network for which Warner provided detailed forecasts.

The news channel is expected to generate $1.8 billion in revenue this year, rising to $2.2 billion by 2030, with adjusted Ebitda of about $600 million, roughly flat over the period.

Debt and structural changes

Warner said it is also making changes to the balance sheet of the cable business it plans to spin off.

Under the revised Netflix agreement, the amount of debt allocated to Discovery Global, the entity that will house the cable networks, will be reduced by $260 million.

The company said the reduction reflects better-than-expected cash flow performance last year and is intended to ease concerns that a heavy debt load could deter investors from backing the spun-off business.

Market reaction and next steps

The revised deal removes a so-called collar that had been designed to protect Warner shareholders from large swings in Netflix’s share price between signing and closing.

Netflix shares have been trading below the lower end of that range since the deal was announced in December and fell further after Paramount revealed its hostile bid.

Netflix shares have declined about 15% since the original announcement, though they rose after reports emerged that the company was considering an all-cash offer.

With regulators now reviewing the revised agreement and Paramount showing no sign of backing down, the coming months are likely to determine whether Netflix’s cash-rich approach is enough to secure Warner Bros. Discovery — or whether the battle for one of Hollywood’s most storied media groups will escalate further.

The post Netflix revises Warner Bros Discovery takeover to all-cash deal, WBD board approves appeared first on Invezz

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.03356
$0.03356$0.03356
-1.87%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37