TLDR: Quidax ends P2P trading, citing user preferences and regulatory caution within sandbox. SEC flags opaque P2P flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign TLDR: Quidax ends P2P trading, citing user preferences and regulatory caution within sandbox. SEC flags opaque P2P flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign

Nigeria Crypto Sandbox Hits First Wall: Quidax Shuts Down Peer-to-Peer Service

3 min read

TLDR:

  • Quidax ends P2P trading, citing user preferences and regulatory caution within sandbox.
  • SEC flags opaque P2P flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign platform dominance.
  • Licensing delays and higher capital requirements raise compliance challenges for exchanges.
  • Quidax delists 35 tokens to align platform with Nigerian regulatory expectations.

Nigeria crypto sandbox has faced its first notable challenge as Quidax, a provisionally licensed digital asset exchange, announced the closure of its peer-to-peer (P2P) trading platform.

The shutdown comes just five months after the feature launched under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (ARIP).

Quidax will continue instant swaps and order-book trading, but the P2P exit illustrates limits in the sandbox’s ability to oversee informal trading activity.

P2P Trading Faces Regulatory and Operational Limits

Quidax stated in an email to users, “We are retiring our P2P marketplace to focus on services that provide a more secure and efficient trading experience.”

The platform added that ads, merchant chats, and escrow services will be disabled, while other trading products will continue.

The P2P feature was initially designed to provide a controlled environment for users to trade directly. Merchants required full registration, Level-3 know-your-customer verification, two-factor authentication, and a minimum participation history. Approved traders were issued badges signaling verification and trust.

Despite these safeguards, the SEC has expressed long-standing concerns over P2P markets. In 2024, the regulator noted that “opaque transaction flows, off-platform settlements, and foreign dominance make supervision challenging and increase risk for investors.”

Quidax’s attempt to internalize trades within its platform responded to these issues, but operational limits have now become apparent.

The P2P exit marks the first visible boundary of the sandbox, showing that activities not closely aligned with traditional capital-market structures, such as order-book trading or custodial swaps, remain easier to supervise. Quidax’s decision highlights the balance between innovation and regulatory visibility.

Licensing Delays and Strategic Platform Adjustments

Quidax’s timing coincides with delays in ARIP licensing. Startups, including Quidax and Busha, were expected to transition to full licenses by August 2025.

A SEC spokesperson said, “We are reassessing supervisory readiness to ensure platforms meet capital-market standards before granting full licensure.”

New rules under the Investment and Securities Act (2025) classify digital assets as securities, bringing exchanges firmly under capital-market regulation.

Digital Asset Intermediaries (DAIs) and Digital Asset Platform Operators (DAPOs) now require a minimum capital of N500 million ($352,000). Combined services, including P2P trading, custody, or escrow, further increase regulatory obligations.

Quidax has also announced plans to delist 35 tokens, including meme coins, gaming assets, and tokens such as Worldcoin and World Liberty Financial. The company stated, “This adjustment aligns our platform with regulatory expectations and ensures safer trading for all users.”

The P2P shutdown represents the first clear wall for Nigeria’s crypto sandbox. Exchanges are now focusing on products that regulators can effectively monitor while maintaining liquidity and active trading for users in Nigeria’s developing crypto ecosystem.

The post Nigeria Crypto Sandbox Hits First Wall: Quidax Shuts Down Peer-to-Peer Service appeared first on Blockonomi.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07