PANews reported on January 29th that, according to data from Solanacompass, the number of validator nodes on the Solana blockchain has plummeted from a peak of PANews reported on January 29th that, according to data from Solanacompass, the number of validator nodes on the Solana blockchain has plummeted from a peak of

The number of Solana validator nodes decreased sharply by 68% from 2,560 in March 2023 to 795.

2026/01/29 19:43
News Brief
PANews reported on January 29th that Solana's validator nodes have plummeted from 2,560 in March 2023 to merely 795 today—a staggering 68% decline raising serious concerns about network decentralization. Escalating operational costs combined with zero-fee competition are forcing smaller operators out, as they struggle to maintain financial viability.Independent validator Moo shared on X that numerous small validators are contemplating shutting down operations, not from diminished confidence in Solana, but because node management has become economically unsustainable. Therefore, when major validators implement 0% fee structures, smaller competitors find themselves priced out, effectively transforming decentralization into what Moo describes as a "charitable act."Compounding these challenges, Solana's Nakamoto Coefficient—which assesses blockchain decentralization—dropped from 31 to 20 throughout this period, representing a 35% decrease that signals increasingly concentrated staking patterns. The primary driver appears to be soaring operational expenses. According to Agave's technical documentation, validators must hold at least 401 SOL annually just for voting fees, plus additional hardware and server costs, totaling approximately $49,000 in SOL tokens upfront. The Solana Foundation has yet to address this situation.

PANews reported on January 29th that, according to data from Solanacompass, the number of validator nodes on the Solana blockchain has plummeted from a peak of 2,560 to the current 795 since March 2023, a drop of 68%. This trend has raised concerns about the network's decentralization, as increased operating costs and zero-fee competition make it difficult for small node operators to survive.

Moo, an independent validator node operator, stated on the X platform that many small validators are considering shutting down their nodes, not because they have lost faith in Solana, but because they find it economically unsustainable. Moo pointed out that the 0% fee charged by large validators makes it unprofitable for small validators, turning decentralization into a "charitable act."

The number of Solana validator nodes decreased sharply by 68% from 2,560 in March 2023 to 795.

Furthermore, Solana's decentralization metric, Nakamoto Coefficient, also dropped from 31 in March 2023 to 20, a decrease of 35%. This metric measures the degree of decentralization of a blockchain, and the decline indicates that Solana's staking supply distribution has become more concentrated, and the network's decentralization level has decreased.

The surge in operating costs is likely the primary reason for the reduction in validator nodes. According to the technical documentation for Solana's validator node Agave, in addition to hardware and server costs, validators must hold at least 401 SOL annually to pay voting fees, requiring an initial investment of approximately $49,000 in SOL tokens to maintain operations. The Solana Foundation has not yet commented on this.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

Zaldy Co asks SC to halt graft reso

FORMER Party-list Rep. Elizaldy “Zaldy” S. Co has filed a petition before the Supreme Court (SC) to halt an Ombudsman resolution that found probable cause to charge
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/29 21:08
FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33