If you are wondering what is the lowest commission a realtor will take, this guide lays out the common ranges, why rates vary, and how to evaluate lower-fee optionsIf you are wondering what is the lowest commission a realtor will take, this guide lays out the common ranges, why rates vary, and how to evaluate lower-fee options

What is the lowest commission a realtor will take? – Practical guide

If you are wondering what is the lowest commission a realtor will take, this guide lays out the common ranges, why rates vary, and how to evaluate lower-fee options. It focuses on practical checks you can use when interviewing agents and comparing proposals.

We explain typical commission structures, recent market reporting, and the tradeoffs that come with discount broker models and flat-fee listings. Use this as a starting point to model net proceeds and document any negotiated changes.

Realtor commissions are negotiable, and traditional total seller-paid commissions are often used as a reference point.
Discount and flat-fee listing options can lower headline fees but may reduce marketing or showings.
Always compare net proceeds and get any fee changes in writing before signing a listing agreement.

What realtor commissions are and why they vary

How commissions are typically structured, how to get started real estate

Realtor commissions are the fees sellers commonly pay to compensate the listing agent and the buyer agent when a home closes. These fees are most often calculated as a percentage of the sale price and paid from seller proceeds, but the exact amount and how it is split are negotiated between the parties.

In many markets the traditional structure has been a combined seller-paid commission that is shared between the listing agent and the buyer agent, and this setup is described in industry reporting and seller profiles.

The way commissions are set depends on several factors, including local custom, the agent business model, and state-level practices; for an overview of buyer and seller compensation and how it is reported, see the NAR profile of home buyers and sellers NAR profile of home buyers and sellers.

Business models influence accepted rates. Full-service agents typically bundle marketing, open houses, negotiation and contract management into a single percentage fee, while discount or limited-service agents offer fewer bundled tasks and lower headline fees.

Quick net proceeds estimate for a seller to compare commission structures




Result:

Use as a rough comparison

State regulation and local MLS rules also shape how compensation appears in listings and how buyer-agent payment is shown to sellers and buyers, which is one reason commissions are treated as negotiable rather than fixed in many places.

Who usually pays and how the split works

When a seller pays a commission, the amount is typically stated in the listing agreement and then shared between the seller’s listing agent and the buyer agent according to the agreed split. The listing agreement should specify who pays what and what services are included.

Sellers should confirm who covers buyer-agent compensation if they are exploring nontraditional fee arrangements so there are no surprises at closing.


Finance Police Logo

Historical norms seen in NAR data

Historically, total seller-paid commissions in the U.S. have commonly clustered around roughly 5% to 6% of the sale price, split between listing and buyer agents, as a widely cited reference range in seller guidance and market profiles NAR profile of home buyers and sellers.

That historical reference point helps sellers form expectations when they interview agents, but reported averages can mask local differences in dense urban markets or high-value suburbs.

Recent market data showing shifts in buyer-agent shares

More recent market data show some downward pressure on buyer-agent shares in certain quarters, with reporting that buyer-agent portions have fallen into lower ranges in 2024 and 2025 in parts of the market Redfin data on commission trends.

Published averages and quarterly reports are useful context, but they can hide variation by property type, price point, and local demand, so sellers should treat them as background rather than a fixed rule.

How different agent models affect fees and services

Full-service agents vs discount brokerages

Finance Police - Image 1

Full-service listing agents typically charge a percentage fee and include a set of tasks: listing on the MLS, professional photos, coordination of showings, negotiation, and contract work. That bundled approach is why percentage fees tend to be higher with full-service representation.

Discount brokerages and limited-service agents lower the headline fee by unbundling or reducing those services, for example offering a flat-fee MLS listing or charging separately for marketing and staging.

Flat-fee MLS and buyer-rebate options and tradeoffs

Flat-fee MLS listings, buyer-rebate programs, and discount broker models can reduce or replace traditional percentage commissions, sometimes offering flat amounts or fees well below the 5% to 6% norm, though the exact availability and terms vary by market and provider.

When fees are lower, sellers should expect tradeoffs. Reduced marketing, fewer open houses, or limited agent availability can result from lower-fee models, and those tradeoffs may affect the number of showings or the final sale price.

Download a free FinancePolice seller checklist or sign up for the email list to get practical templates and a simple net-proceeds worksheet.

View advertising options

A step-by-step framework to negotiate realtor fees

Preparation: research and net proceeds modeling

Start by gathering local comparable sales and asking for sample net sheets from agents under different fee scenarios. Comparing estimated net proceeds under realistic price assumptions helps show whether a lower headline fee actually improves the seller’s bottom line.

Ask agents to provide written examples of recent listings where they accepted a reduced fee and include the sale outcomes so you can compare cases that resemble your property.

Negotiation tactics and how to document agreements

Common seller tactics to lower fees include offering tiered commission splits where the buyer-agent share increases if the buyer brings a full-price offer, unbundling services so the seller pays separately for marketing, and soliciting multiple bids to compare service and net proceeds.

Any deviation from a standard commission should be written into the listing agreement. Document the scope of services, who pays buyer-agent compensation, and any separate marketing fees so the contract reflects the negotiated terms.

Decision criteria: when a lower commission makes sense

Factors that commonly allow lower commissions include a high-demand local market, a higher-priced property where an agent may accept a smaller percentage, and a seller willing to accept limited or unbundled services, as seen in market analyses and seller guidance Realtor.com guidance on commissions.

Compare net sale proceeds rather than headline percentages, and ask for written net sheets that model likely sale prices under each fee option so you can see estimated proceeds after fees and expenses.

The lowest commission varies by market and service level; while traditional total seller-paid commissions have often clustered around 5% to 6%, discount models and negotiated splits can reduce fees, though sellers should compare net proceeds and service tradeoffs before accepting a lower rate.

Also consider how reduced marketing or fewer showings might change buyer traffic; in some cases lower fees correlate with less outreach and fewer competitive bids, which can reduce the final price and offset commission savings.

Common mistakes sellers make when chasing the lowest commission

A frequent mistake is focusing on the percentage alone without modeling net proceeds. A lower fee that comes with weaker marketing or fewer showings can reduce the sale price enough to erase any commission savings, so always run the numbers.

Another mistake is relying on verbal assurances. If an agent agrees to a lower fee or different service levels, require those terms in writing in the listing agreement and an explicit marketing plan so expectations are clear.

Failing to check an agent’s track record on similar lower-fee deals or not asking for recent references can also leave sellers exposed to poor execution when they need to attract buyers and manage negotiations.

Practical examples and scenarios

Scenario: a seller with a high-value home in a very hot local market may find a listing agent willing to accept a lower percentage because the likely sale price means the agent still earns a satisfactory commission in absolute dollars; when that happens, confirm the agent will still provide full marketing and negotiation services similar to their standard package.

Scenario: a flat-fee MLS listing can cut seller costs, which may make sense if the home is priced to move quickly and the seller will handle showings and some marketing, but that path typically reduces exposure to buyer agents and may require the seller to coordinate more tasks.

Finance Police Advertisement

For any scenario, run a net-proceeds comparison that includes the expected sale price under realistic exposure assumptions, the proposed fees, and estimated closing costs so you can judge whether a lower commission truly improves your outcome.

Checklist: questions to ask before accepting a reduced fee

Confirm which services are included and which are extra, and get that list in writing. Ask specifically about photography, open houses, paid marketing, and who will handle negotiations and contract paperwork.

Request recent sell-side examples where the agent accepted a reduced fee and ask for the resulting net proceeds so you can compare similar outcomes, and ask for a written net sheet comparing options.

Ask how buyer-agent compensation will be shown in the MLS and whether the agent expects you to pay any additional listing costs if certain marketing items are needed.

Conclusion: balancing fees and outcomes

Key takeaways

Typical total seller-paid commissions have historically clustered around 5% to 6% as a reference point, but recent shifts in buyer-agent shares and alternative agent models mean many sellers now have more negotiating room and choices; for context on recent buyer-agent share trends see market reporting Redfin data on commission trends.

Lower commissions can save money, but the key question is whether the reduced fee changes marketing, showings, or negotiation quality enough to lower the sale price and net proceeds. Verify service scope, compare written net sheets, and document any fee changes in the listing agreement.

When you interview agents, ask for written service scopes, sample net sheets, and recent examples of similar listings where they accepted different fee arrangements; use those documents to compare expected outcomes and to record any agreed fee changes in the listing contract.


Finance Police Logo

FinancePolice can be a resource for plain-language checklists and templates to help you compare proposals and document decisions without promising outcomes or results.

Yes. Commissions are typically negotiable. Ask agents for written proposals, compare net proceeds under different fee structures, and document any agreed changes in the listing agreement.

Not always. Lower commissions can reduce marketing or showings and may lower the sale price enough to offset the fee savings, so compare modeled net proceeds before deciding.

Ask which services are included, for recent examples of similar reduced-fee sales, and for a written net sheet showing estimated proceeds under the proposed fee.

Deciding on a commission is a balance between fees and results. Focus on written comparisons of expected net proceeds, confirm the scope of services, and record any changes in the listing contract. That approach helps you judge whether a lower fee is likely to improve your outcome.

References

  • https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/profile-of-home-buyers-and-sellers
  • https://www.redfin.com/news/real-estate-agent-commission-rates-2025
  • https://www.realtor.com/advice/sell/how-much-are-realtor-commissions/
  • https://financepolice.com/advertise/
  • https://financepolice.com/homes-for-sale-under-100k/
  • https://financepolice.com/sell-used-furniture/
  • https://financepolice.com/
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares Launches JitoSOL Staking ETP on Euronext for European Investors

21Shares launches JitoSOL staking ETP on Euronext, offering European investors regulated access to Solana staking rewards with additional yield opportunities.Read
Share
Coinstats2026/01/30 12:53
Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Digital Asset Infrastructure Firm Talos Raises $45M, Valuation Hits $1.5 Billion

Robinhood, Sony and trading firms back Series B extension as institutional crypto trading platform expands into traditional asset tokenization
Share
Blockhead2026/01/30 13:30
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40