Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has responded to recent allegations circulating about himself and the company. Here are the details. Continue Reading: ChangpengBinance founder Changpeng Zhao has responded to recent allegations circulating about himself and the company. Here are the details. Continue Reading: Changpeng

Changpeng Zhao (CZ) Responds to FUD Spreading About Binance and Himself

3 min read

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has issued a comprehensive statement regarding the “FUD” (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) content circulating on social media about the platform in recent days.

CZ responded individually to a number of issues, including the Polymarket allegations, the “supercycle” narrative, news of Bitcoin sales, and speculation surrounding the SAFU fund.

CZ stated that an event circulating on social media, allegedly reaching a $7 million volume on Polymarket related to Binance, was completely fake. Zhao argued that this event did not exist on Polymarket or any other prediction market, saying, “If there really was such a volume, I would have been the first to react.” The prediction market on Polymarket, asking “Will something be thrown in CZ’s face at a cryptocurrency event in 2026?”, was claimed to have reached a probability of over 80%.

CZ said the claim had excited some critics and worried some supporters, adding that the news was completely unfounded.

Zhao also responded humorously to claims that he had “canceled” the “supercycle” narrative, a frequent topic of discussion in the crypto market. Stating that he doesn’t have the power to control the markets, CZ reminded everyone of his previous statement where he only said he was “less confident than before.” He asserted that this statement was misinterpreted and that he has no authority to steer the market.

Related News: New Details About Cryptocurrencies Emerge in the Epstein Papers: A Founder Tried to Contact Epstein

One of the issues CZ addressed most clearly was the claim that “Binance sold $1 billion worth of Bitcoin.” Zhao stated that this news was a misinterpretation, saying that it was not Binance that sold Bitcoin, but rather the platform’s users.

CZ argued that the exchange’s wallet balances only change when users withdraw assets, stating that most users continue to hold their assets on Binance after trading and use the platform like a wallet. Therefore, he emphasized that trading volume should not be confused with company assets.

Another point of contention was Binance’s plan to convert its SAFU (Secure Asset Fund for Users) to Bitcoin. CZ reminded everyone that it had previously been announced that the fund would be converted to Bitcoin within 30 days. He stated that this conversion was planned to be spread over a specific period, not all at once, and that it was natural for the funds not to appear on-chain immediately. He also added that Binance is a centralized exchange (CEX) and conducts transactions through centralized liquidity, therefore purchases would not appear on decentralized exchanges (DEX).

CZ also used a mathematical analogy to illustrate that purchasing approximately $1 billion worth of Bitcoin within 30 days would have a limited impact on the market capitalization of $1.7 trillion. He stated that this move was more of a gesture of confidence, and that its psychological impact on the market depended on investors’ assessment.

*This is not investment advice.

Continue Reading: Changpeng Zhao (CZ) Responds to FUD Spreading About Binance and Himself

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.