The post Uniswap Patent Lawsuit Dismissed: UNI Impact appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New YorkThe post Uniswap Patent Lawsuit Dismissed: UNI Impact appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York

Uniswap Patent Lawsuit Dismissed: UNI Impact

U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York dismissed the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin Ltd., affiliated with Bancor, against Uniswap Labs and Uniswap Foundation. The court ruled that the patents target abstract ideas such as calculating exchange rates for cryptocurrency exchanges and fail the U.S. Supreme Court’s two-step Alice patent eligibility test, thus not eligible for protection.

Source: Hayden Adams

Details of the Uniswap Patent Case Dismissal Decision

While the decision is a procedural victory for Uniswap, it is not final; the case was dismissed without prejudice, allowing plaintiffs 21 days to file an amended complaint. The court also stated that claims of direct infringement, inducement, and willful infringement were not sufficiently pled. This goes down in history as the first major hurdle in patent wars among DeFi protocols.

Court grants motion to dismiss. Source: CourtListener

Alice Test and the Abstract Idea Problem of Crypto Patents

The two-step test defined by the Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank decision examines whether patents (1) are abstract ideas, and (2) contain an inventive application. Bancor’s patents (e.g., US 10,902,456) covered ratio calculations in liquidity pools, but the court viewed them as ‘mathematical formulas.’ This is a critical precedent that complicates patenting Uniswap’s AMM model (x*y=k).

Hayden Adams’ X Post and Community Reaction

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams posted on the X platform, “A lawyer told us we won.” Cointelegraph requested comment but received no response. The DeFi community is celebrating the decision as a victory for open-source innovation while discussing the next moves of patent trolls. Click for detailed UNI analysis.

UNI Price and Technical Indicators: Supports in Downtrend

As of February 11, 2026, UNI price is $3.23, 24-hour change -%4.21. RSI 26.54 (oversold), Supertrend bearish, above EMA20 $3.9571. The table below shows key levels:

LevelPriceScoreDistanceSources
S1 (Strong)$2.845076/100 ⭐-12.06%Fib 0.000, Donchian Lower
S2 (Strong)$3.180067/100 ⭐-1.70%RSI Oversold, Prev Day Low
R1 (Strong)$3.694966/100 ⭐+14.22%Fib 0.114, Prev Day High
R2 (Strong)$3.439364/100 ⭐+6.32%Ichimoku Tenkan

In the downtrend, S2 ($3.18) is the first test point; if broken, watch S1. Check UNI futures.

DeFi Patent Risks and Uniswap’s Future

The decision weakens patent strategies of competitors like Bancor, but there is a risk of amended complaints. Experts predict this precedent will limit DEX patents. Related coins like ALT are also indirectly affected; check ALT price analysis. Investors may view the RSI oversold signal as an opportunity.

Strategic Recommendations for Uniswap Investors

  • Short-term: Monitor S2 support, await RSI recovery.
  • Long-term: Patent victory strengthens UNI’s DeFi leadership.
  • Risks: Refiling of the case, regulatory uncertainty.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/uniswap-patent-lawsuit-dismissed-uni-impact

Market Opportunity
UNISWAP Logo
UNISWAP Price(UNI)
$3.955
$3.955$3.955
+17.49%
USD
UNISWAP (UNI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.