The post NEAR Technical Analysis Feb 22 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEAR Protocol is trading at $1.01 in a short-term downtrend; it continues to stay belowThe post NEAR Technical Analysis Feb 22 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. NEAR Protocol is trading at $1.01 in a short-term downtrend; it continues to stay below

NEAR Technical Analysis Feb 22

NEAR Protocol is trading at $1.01 in a short-term downtrend; it continues to stay below EMA20 and Supertrend is giving a bearish signal. While RSI at 36.81 shows low momentum, MACD exhibits bullish divergence with a positive histogram, but the overall picture mandates a cautious approach.

Executive Summary

NEAR, at its current $1.01 price, has experienced a 3.33% drop in 24 hours, sustaining its short-term downtrend. The main support at $0.9752 is set to be tested, while nearby resistance at $1.0448 forms a strong barrier; BTC’s downtrend carries additional risk for altcoins. With mixed indicator signals (low RSI, bullish MACD), the risk/reward ratio looks unfavorable for longs and attractive for shorts. Strategically, a break below $0.9752 could lead to bearish targets ($0.8410 and $0.3560).

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

NEAR’s overall trend structure is characterized by a dominant downtrend. On the daily timeframe, the price has retraced nearly 50% from recent highs and formed a lower low pattern. On the short-term (4H) chart, it is moving within a bearish channel; after breaking the upper band at $1.06, it experienced a quick rejection. On the long-term weekly chart, the correction from 2025 highs ($5+ levels) continues, but the $1.00 psychological support is critical. The Supertrend indicator is in bearish mode and points to $1.27 resistance, limiting potential rebounds. Multi-timeframe analysis (1D/3D/1W) identifies 8 strong levels: 1D with 2S/2R, 3D with 2S/1R, 1W with 2S/3R distribution, confirming a clear structural bearish bias.

Structural Levels

Structural levels were defined by synthesizing Fibonacci retracement and pivot points. Critical supports: $0.9752 (66/100 score, EMA50 confluence), $0.8410 (61/100, previous low). Resistances: $1.0448 (81/100, strong volume cluster), $1.9429 (61/100, long-term trendline). These levels highlight the fragility of the market structure; a close above $1.0448 would signal a bullish reversal, while below $0.9752 would trigger bearish acceleration.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 36.81, approaching the oversold region, signaling waning selling pressure but bullish momentum remains weak without crossing above 50. No bearish divergence on daily RSI, but negative divergence observed on 4H. MACD’s positive histogram (bullish) is notable; signal line crossover is near, creating short-term bounce potential. Stochastic at 25%, ready for oversold bounce but overall momentum leans bearish. CCI at -150, giving oversold signal. Momentum mix: Short-term bullish divergences present, but trend indicators dominate the downtrend.

Trend Indicators

Price is trading below EMA20 ($1.09), confirming bearish short-term bias; EMA50 ($1.15) and EMA200 ($1.45) act as resistance. Death cross (EMA20 < EMA50) is active, golden cross distant. Supertrend bearish, placing trailing stop resistance at $1.27. In Ichimoku Cloud, price is below the cloud, tenkan-kijun death cross completed. ADX at 28 shows strong trend (bearish). All trend indicators confirm the downtrend, with rebounds remaining limited.

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

In support analysis, $0.9752 (66/100) is the most critical, with volume profile and order block confluence; a break leads to $0.8410 (61/100). In resistance, $1.0448 (81/100) is the strongest, above 24h range and pivot R1; if surpassed, $1.09 EMA20 is tested. Long-term $1.9429 (61/100) is major resistance. Multi-TF levels (8 total): 1W supports $0.84/$0.36, resistances $1.94/$2.50. This map shows 3.5% downside risk from $1.01 (96% upside potential); asymmetric bearish profile dominates.

Volume and Market Participation

24h volume $77.80M, low compared to previous days (20% decrease), indicating weakening selling pressure but insufficient buyer participation. Volume delta negative, sellers dominating. OBV in downtrend, no divergence. POC (Point of Control) at $1.03, volume clusters below price weakening supports. Increasing volume on breakouts critical; current low volume signals choppy range, volume confirmation required for breakouts.

Risk Assessment

In risk/reward framework, bullish target from current $1.01 is $1.3675 (score 25/100, RR 0.36:1 low), bearish target $0.3560 (score 22/100, RR 1:1.8 attractive). Main risks: BTC downtrend break ($67k below), liquidity hunts in NEAR. Volatility high (ATR 5%+), stop-loss suggestion: Below $0.9752 for longs, above $1.0448 for shorts. Overall risk high, position sizing limited to 1-2%. Protection: Positive if $0.9752 holds, trail stop on break.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $67,520 in downtrend, 24h -1.06%; Supertrend bearish. NEAR correlates 0.85 with BTC; if BTC $67,134 support breaks, NEAR tests $0.9752, drop to $64,402 targets $0.84. If BTC resistances $68,056/$70,622 surpassed, NEAR rebounds to $1.04+, but BTC dominance rise crushes alts. Watch: BTC $60k critical, major bear trigger for NEAR. Details in NEAR Spot Analysis and NEAR Futures Analysis.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

NEAR’s technical picture is clearly bearish: Downtrend, price below EMA, low RSI indicates selling exhaustion but MACD divergence limits bounce. If critical $0.9752 support fails to hold, $0.84/$0.36 targets realistic; $1.0448 break essential for reversal. BTC downtrend adds pressure, volume surge determines breakout. Strategy: Shorts in $1.01-$1.04 range (target $0.9752), longs only on $1.0448 confirmation. Risk management priority, monitor market cautiously. This holistic analysis provides the full market picture for decision-makers.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/near-comprehensive-technical-analysis-detailed-review-of-february-22-2026

Market Opportunity
Ucan fix life in1day Logo
Ucan fix life in1day Price(1)
$0.0009768
$0.0009768$0.0009768
+14.70%
USD
Ucan fix life in1day (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

Pippin (PIPPIN) Price Prediction 2026–2030: Can PIPPIN Hit $0.70 Soon?

PIPPIN has surged sharply on the daily timeframe, printing a powerful bullish candle with over 25% gains. RSI is holding above 60, signaling strengthening momentum
Share
Coinstats2026/02/23 04:29
Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles

The post Will Cardano Reach $10 by 2030? Analysts Break Down ADA’s Growth Cycles appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Cardano (ADA) is trading at $0.9024 with a market cap of $32.91 billion. Experts say ADA has the potential to climb much higher, with some placing long-term targets as high as $10. The token continues to benefit from stronger visibility, rising liquidity, and increasing inflows from both institutional and retail markets. Can Cardano Hit $10 …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/18 17:19
Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31