The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to retry Roman Storm. The co-founder of the crypto privacy tool Tornado Cash. Prosecutors asked the court to hold a newThe U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to retry Roman Storm. The co-founder of the crypto privacy tool Tornado Cash. Prosecutors asked the court to hold a new

DOJ Seeks Retrial for Tornado Cash Co-Founder Roman Storm

2026/03/10 16:24
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) wants to retry Roman Storm. The co-founder of the crypto privacy tool Tornado Cash. Prosecutors asked the court to hold a new trial. After the jury in Storm’s first trial could not agree on two key charges. The charges include money laundering and breaking US sanctions rules. 

Since the jury was unable to reach a decision. The judge declared the jury hung on those counts. Prosecutors now want another trial to resolve such issues. They suggested October 2026 as the possible date. Through Storm’s lawyers are still fighting his earlier conviction in the same case.

First Trial Ended Without a Full Decision

In 2025, Roman Storm had his first trial. Following weeks of testimony the jury’s verdict was divided. Storm was found guilty on one count by the jury. Those claims said he helped in the operation of an unlicensed money transmission service. 

But the jury could not agree on the other two charges. As a result, the court did not give a final decision on them. The DOJ now wants another trial so that a new jury can decide the charges. Also, Storm’s legal team has urged the judge. To throw out his verdict from the first trial. A decision on this request is still pending.

Tornado Cash Is at the Center of the Case

The case centers on Tornado Cash, a tool based on the Ethereum blockchain. Tornado Cash works as a crypto mixer. It mixes many transactions together. So people cannot easily trace where the money came from. Some people use mixers to protect their financial privacy. But law enforcement says criminals also use them to hide stolen or illegal funds. The U.S. Treasury placed sanctions on Tornado Cash previously. Officials said the platform helped hide billions of dollars linked to cybercrime. Storm helped create the software as part of an open source project.

Big Debate in the Crypto Community

Roman Storm’s case has started a big debate in the crypto world. Many developers believe writing open source code should not be a crime. They argue that software creators cannot control how others use their tools. But prosecutors believe Storm played a role in running a system that allowed illegal money to move. Investigators say more than $1 billion in criminal funds passed through Tornado Cash. Due to this authorities say the case is important for fighting financial crime.

Why This Case Matters?

The retrial could affect the future of crypto development. Many developers are watching the case closely. They want to see how courts treat privacy tools and open source software. If developers can be held responsible for how their code is used. Some experts worry it could slow innovation. For now, the DOJ’s request means the legal fight is not over. A new trial could decide whether Storm is responsible for the remaining charges. The outcome may shape how governments deal with crypto tools and blockchain developers in the future.

The post DOJ Seeks Retrial for Tornado Cash Co-Founder Roman Storm appeared first on Coinfomania.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Winklevoss Twins Move $130M Bitcoin to Gemini Wallets

Crypto investors are watching the latest moves from twins Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss. According to blockchain tracking data, wallets linked to the
Share
Coinfomania2026/03/10 20:12
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00
What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

What to Expect in Laptop Rental Services: A Cost Breakdown

Laptop rental services are emerging as a popular choice. This is true, especially among businesses that require temporary equipment. Renting a laptop can be an
Share
Techbullion2026/03/10 20:05