The official Bonk.fun website, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, was hijacked by attackers who compromised a team-associated domain account and injected a maliciousThe official Bonk.fun website, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, was hijacked by attackers who compromised a team-associated domain account and injected a malicious

Bonk.fun Website Was Hijacked and Used to Drain User Wallets: Here Is What to Do

2026/03/12 21:23
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

The official Bonk.fun website, a Solana-based memecoin launchpad, was hijacked by attackers who compromised a team-associated domain account and injected a malicious wallet-draining script disguised as a standard Terms of Service prompt, with one trader already reporting a loss of $273,000.

How the Attack Worked

According to official statement by the Bonk.fun team and operator, known as Tom, the breach did not require exploiting smart contract vulnerabilities or breaking wallet encryption. Attackers gained control of the platform’s domain through a compromised team account, then replaced legitimate site functionality with a deceptive Terms of Service pop-up designed to appear as a routine interaction users would not question.

Signing the fake prompt grants the attacker wallet permissions that allow immediate asset transfer. The mechanism is a signature-based drainer, one of the most effective attack vectors in crypto because it bypasses technical security entirely by exploiting user trust in familiar interfaces.

Only users who visited the site and signed the fraudulent prompt during the hijack window beginning Wednesday March 11 are at risk. Users who previously connected wallets before the breach without signing the new prompt are reportedly unaffected. Traders accessing Bonk-related tokens through external terminals rather than the bonk.fun interface directly are also safe.

The $273,000 single-trader loss is the largest confirmed figure. Other reported losses range between 10 and 50 SOL per affected wallet, suggesting the drainer was operating across multiple victim accounts simultaneously during the exposure window.

The Bank of England Is Rewriting Its Stablecoin Rules After Industry Pushback – The £20,000 Cap May Not Survive

What To Do

Do not visit bonk.fun until the team issues an explicit all-clear confirming the domain is fully secured and the malicious script has been removed. If you visited the site within the past 24 hours, open your wallet settings and remove Bonk.fun from the connected sites list. That step alone does not revoke permissions already granted. Go to Revoke.cash, connect your wallet, and cancel any approvals associated with the platform’s contracts from the past 24 hours. Check your transaction history for any unauthorized outbound transfers you did not initiate.

The attack pattern here mirrors the broader address poisoning and social engineering threats covered in this publication’s Trust Wallet security analysis earlier this week. The attack surface is not the blockchain or the wallet software. It is the moment a user signs something without fully verifying what they are authorizing. Fake ToS prompts, fake approval requests, and lookalike interfaces are all variations of the same exploit: manufacturing a context where signing feels routine.

Domain-level compromises are particularly dangerous because they affect every user who visits the legitimate URL. There is no way for a user to distinguish a hijacked legitimate domain from its clean version without examining the underlying scripts, which most users do not do. The only protection is speed of response once the breach is identified and immediate revocation of any permissions granted during the exposure window.

If funds have already moved, they are likely unrecoverable. Solana transactions are final and irreversible.

The post Bonk.fun Website Was Hijacked and Used to Drain User Wallets: Here Is What to Do appeared first on ETHNews.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Stephen Gregory named binance us ceo as exchange targets expansion in US crypto market

Binance.US names Stephen Gregory as binance us ceo, signaling expansion in the US crypto market with a renewed focus on compliance.
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/03/12 20:09
The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

The Growing World of Medical Aesthetics: Enhancing Beauty Through Science and Innovation

In recent years, the field of medical aesthetics has grown rapidly as more individuals seek safe and effective ways to enhance their appearance and improve their
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 23:21