The post Third Circuit considers CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction contracts for Kalshi and Polymarket appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways The Third Circuit is evaluating if the CFTC should have exclusive regulatory power over sports prediction contracts. The outcome could set jurisdictional standards affecting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today heard arguments regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s potential exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction trading contracts, in a case involving Kalshi and New Jersey. The case centers on whether the CFTC should have sole regulatory authority over contracts that allow trading based on sports event outcomes. Kalshi, a derivatives trading platform, is challenging the current regulatory framework for sports prediction markets. The proceedings mark a key regulatory development for prediction markets in the US, as the court’s decision could establish clear jurisdictional boundaries for sports-related trading contracts. The court’s ruling could impact both Kalshi and Polymarket, two platforms that offer prediction market trading services. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/cftc-jurisdiction-sports-contracts-case/The post Third Circuit considers CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction contracts for Kalshi and Polymarket appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways The Third Circuit is evaluating if the CFTC should have exclusive regulatory power over sports prediction contracts. The outcome could set jurisdictional standards affecting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today heard arguments regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s potential exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction trading contracts, in a case involving Kalshi and New Jersey. The case centers on whether the CFTC should have sole regulatory authority over contracts that allow trading based on sports event outcomes. Kalshi, a derivatives trading platform, is challenging the current regulatory framework for sports prediction markets. The proceedings mark a key regulatory development for prediction markets in the US, as the court’s decision could establish clear jurisdictional boundaries for sports-related trading contracts. The court’s ruling could impact both Kalshi and Polymarket, two platforms that offer prediction market trading services. Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/cftc-jurisdiction-sports-contracts-case/

Third Circuit considers CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction contracts for Kalshi and Polymarket

Key Takeaways

  • The Third Circuit is evaluating if the CFTC should have exclusive regulatory power over sports prediction contracts.
  • The outcome could set jurisdictional standards affecting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today heard arguments regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s potential exclusive jurisdiction over sports prediction trading contracts, in a case involving Kalshi and New Jersey.

The case centers on whether the CFTC should have sole regulatory authority over contracts that allow trading based on sports event outcomes. Kalshi, a derivatives trading platform, is challenging the current regulatory framework for sports prediction markets.

The proceedings mark a key regulatory development for prediction markets in the US, as the court’s decision could establish clear jurisdictional boundaries for sports-related trading contracts.

The court’s ruling could impact both Kalshi and Polymarket, two platforms that offer prediction market trading services.

Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/cftc-jurisdiction-sports-contracts-case/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.