Australia’s government has released new details on how its upcoming law banning children under 16 from opening social media accounts will be enforced.  The guidelines expand on earlier advice from the eSafety Commission, which gave technology companies a way to check whether their services would be included in the ban.  That earlier document said platforms […]Australia’s government has released new details on how its upcoming law banning children under 16 from opening social media accounts will be enforced.  The guidelines expand on earlier advice from the eSafety Commission, which gave technology companies a way to check whether their services would be included in the ban.  That earlier document said platforms […]

Australia releases new details on its social media ban for teens

Australia’s government has released new details on how its upcoming law banning children under 16 from opening social media accounts will be enforced. 

The guidelines expand on earlier advice from the eSafety Commission, which gave technology companies a way to check whether their services would be included in the ban. 

That earlier document said platforms focused on professional networking, education, health, or online gaming would not be restricted.

The most recent update makes it clear that mainstream social media sites will be subject to the new rules. It also outlines what officials consider “reasonable steps” companies must take to comply.

One major requirement is that social media firms detect and deactivate accounts held by people under 16. The government says this should be done carefully, with clear messages sent to users when their accounts are removed.

Privacy protections in age checks

It is still uncertain whether companies will also delete the content posted by underage users. Another question is whether young people will be able to recover their accounts once they turn 16. Authorities suggest platforms may need to preserve creative posts and user history.

In addition, companies must stop underage users from signing up again after removal. That may require measures to block attempts to get access using VPNs. Platforms will also have to watch for errors by age check systems that might allow banned users back onto the apps.

The government expects companies to use more than one method to confirm ages. They cannot rely only on asking for a birth date or other self-declared details. At the same time, platforms cannot demand a government-issued ID as the sole proof. Instead, users should be offered different ways to verify their age.

These rules are also meant to address privacy concerns. The government said firms are not expected to keep personal data from age checks. Instead, they must keep records showing that their systems and processes are working properly.

Government approach to age verification

Despite the new restrictions, children under 16 will still be able to see social media content without accounts. For example, they could watch YouTube videos in a browser without logging in.

Parents and caregivers will still play an important role in guiding children’s online activity. The eSafety Commissioner has promised further resources to help families understand the changes. The government is not requiring companies to verify the age of every single user. Furthermore, officials noted that a blanket verification system would be unreasonable.

The eSafety Commission in Australia also stressed that firms should not store personal data collected during age checks. Instead, they should keep general system-level records to prove compliance.

This means that even if some underage accounts slip through, companies may not necessarily be in breach of the law. In a recent press conference, the eSafety Commissioner said that companies must provide clear reporting tools so people can flag missed accounts. If too many slip through, officials will push platforms to adjust their technology.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
Comedian Logo
Comedian Price(BAN)
$0,08332
$0,08332$0,08332
+2,40%
USD
Comedian (BAN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Tom Lee’s Bitmine Scoops Up 3.4% of Ethereum, Triggering a Supply Squeeze

Bitmine Immersion now controls 3.4% of Ethereum amid shrinking exchange supply and rising institutional accumulation.
Share
Crypto Breaking News2026/01/20 16:27