TLDR Aave borrow rates now exceed sUSDe staking yields by up to 2%. Nearly $1B in sUSDe looped DeFi trades are exposed to negative carry. Many sUSDe positions are within 5% of liquidation thresholds. Utilization spikes in USDT and USDC pools are raising borrowing costs. A sharp drop in DeFi borrowing rates after the October [...] The post DeFi Traders Face Losses As $1B In sUSDe Loops Near Liquidation Point appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Aave borrow rates now exceed sUSDe staking yields by up to 2%. Nearly $1B in sUSDe looped DeFi trades are exposed to negative carry. Many sUSDe positions are within 5% of liquidation thresholds. Utilization spikes in USDT and USDC pools are raising borrowing costs. A sharp drop in DeFi borrowing rates after the October [...] The post DeFi Traders Face Losses As $1B In sUSDe Loops Near Liquidation Point appeared first on CoinCentral.

DeFi Traders Face Losses As $1B In sUSDe Loops Near Liquidation Point

TLDR

  • Aave borrow rates now exceed sUSDe staking yields by up to 2%.
  • Nearly $1B in sUSDe looped DeFi trades are exposed to negative carry.
  • Many sUSDe positions are within 5% of liquidation thresholds.
  • Utilization spikes in USDT and USDC pools are raising borrowing costs.

A sharp drop in DeFi borrowing rates after the October 10 market crash has placed nearly $1 billion in sUSDe loop positions at risk. These trades, which once profited from positive yield spreads, now face mounting losses as the borrowing cost on Aave exceeds the staking yield from Ethena’s sUSDe. The unwind of such positions could trigger broader stress across decentralized lending markets.

Leveraged sUSDe Strategies Under Pressure

The loop strategy involving Ethena’s staked USDe (sUSDe) has become less profitable after the recent decline in DeFi funding rates. Traders typically deposit sUSDe as collateral on lending platforms like Aave and Pendle to borrow stablecoins such as USDT or USDC. These borrowed stablecoins are used to purchase more sUSDe, which is again deposited as collateral. This cycle repeats, increasing yield through leverage.

However, after the October 10 crash, the cost of borrowing has risen above the yield generated by staking sUSDe. Sentora Research reported that borrow rates on Aave v3 Core are currently around 2.0% for USDT and 1.5% for USDC, while sUSDe yields remain lower. As a result, the strategy now generates negative carry, where the cost of borrowing outweighs the return from staking.

Negative Yield Spread Increases Risk of Liquidation

With the yield differential now negative, leveraged sUSDe positions are incurring ongoing losses. According to Sentora, this creates pressure on looped positions, especially those close to liquidation thresholds. Many traders are within 5% of forced liquidations, raising concerns about a wave of automatic asset sales if borrowing costs remain high.

Sentora’s note warned, “As the spread remains below zero, looped positions that borrow stablecoins to buy sUSDe start to incur losses.” The research firm added that these losses could lead to a broad unwinding of positions on Aave, which may exceed $1 billion in exposure. A sudden wave of liquidations could reduce liquidity across DeFi markets and increase volatility.

Utilization Spikes Could Accelerate Stress

The current borrowing rates are influenced by utilization levels in USDT and USDC lending pools. If more traders exit or reduce their looped positions, the pool utilization may rise further. This would push borrowing costs even higher, deepening the negative yield and increasing the chances of liquidation.

Sentora also noted an increase in utilization across major pools. This trend, if it continues, may further pressure looped positions. Traders and platforms alike are watching for sustained changes in utilization and borrow rates, as this will influence the stability of the DeFi lending ecosystem.

Monitoring the Spread is Key for Traders

Traders are being urged to closely track the yield spread between sUSDe staking rewards and the Aave borrow APYs for USDT and USDC. A continued negative spread may lead to additional deleveraging. The broader concern is that such unwinds could impact not only individual traders but also platform liquidity and token prices.

Sentora emphasized that the sustainability of looped sUSDe positions depends entirely on the positive carry. Without it, the strategy becomes loss-making, increasing systemic risk across DeFi protocols where these positions are concentrated.

The post DeFi Traders Face Losses As $1B In sUSDe Loops Near Liquidation Point appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000531
$0.000531$0.000531
0.00%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns

The post Coinbase Data Breach Fallout: Former Employee Arrest in India Over Customer Data Case Raises Bitcoin Security Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 10:36
Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

Burmese war amputees get free 3D-printed prostheses, thanks to Thailand-based group

PROSTHETIC FEET. Silicon foot covers fitted with metal rods found in the prosthetic production unit in Mae Tao Clinic. A good prosthetic foot must absorb impact
Share
Rappler2025/12/27 10:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37