Economist Alex Krüger warns that unregulated market makers amplify crypto crashes by withdrawing during volatility.Economist Alex Krüger warns that unregulated market makers amplify crypto crashes by withdrawing during volatility.

Expert: NYSE-Like Oversight Could Prevent Crypto Crashes

A prominent economist is pushing for a major change in how cryptocurrency markets operate, arguing they need rules similar to those of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to stop extreme drops in the values of digital assets.

In a November 6 post on X, Alex Krüger said the absence of regulated market makers has left crypto vulnerable to drastic price collapses during volatile trading.

The Case for Market Maker Rules

In the post, the market expert explained that in traditional finance (TradFi), market makers, responsible for providing liquidity, have a legal duty to keep trading orderly.

On the NYSE, these “Designated Market Makers” must continuously offer to buy and sell specific stocks, even when prices are swinging wildly. On Nasdaq, the entities are required to follow Rule 4613, which obligates them to post quotes within a set spread. If they fail to do so, they face penalties from regulators, including losing their status as market makers.

His conclusion was clear: “THIS MUST CHANGE.”

The conversation, however, revealed the complexities of such a shift. Pelion Capital founder Tony responded, agreeing in principle but pointing out a key detail. He noted that TradFi market makers are protected by mechanisms like “circuit breakers,” automatic trading halts that trigger after a price moves a certain percentage, like 5-10%, with the halts giving them time to manage their risks.

“Without these MM protections, MMs can suffer horrific losses,” Tony wrote, arguing that any new obligations must be balanced with similar safety measures. Krüger agreed, adding that “exchanges can and should implement circuit breakers,” but suggested that inaction is more profitable for them.

Community Debate and Market Reality

The debate extended further, with some X users questioning the very idea of copying traditional finance, calling the framework “dumb and unsophisticated compared to crypto.” Krüger’s blunt reply was that the current system is a key reason “exchanges and market makers RAPE retail traders.”

Others, however, blamed the traders themselves, with one user insisting that real accountability would only begin when market participants ceased their pursuit of high-leverage unicorns.

Recent market turmoil highlights the need for stability. Earlier in the week, the crypto sector lost over $400 billion in value. Analysis from the Kobeissi Letter pointed to extreme leverage as the main cause, noting that an average of 300,000 traders were being liquidated per day.

At the time of writing, the market was still shaky, with Bitcoin (BTC) losing over 7% in the last week, Ethereum (ETH) being down almost 13%, and Ripple’s XRP having fallen by more than 10%, according to data from CoinGecko.

The post Expert: NYSE-Like Oversight Could Prevent Crypto Crashes appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Wink Logo
Wink Price(LIKE)
$0.002715
$0.002715$0.002715
-0.07%
USD
Wink (LIKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next?

The post Onyxcoin Price Breakout Coming — Is a 38% Move Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Onyxcoin price action has entered a tense standoff between bulls
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/14 00:33
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50