BitcoinWorld Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety. Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation. Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about: Data centers driving up utility costs Environmental impacts worsening climate change Chatbots affecting children’s mental health Automation transforming job markets The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs: Requirement Description Penalty Safety Plans Mandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harms Up to $30 million Incident Disclosure Reporting of safety incidents like model theft Civil penalties Risk Prohibition Ban on releasing models with unreasonable risks Legal enforcement Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include: Creating a patchwork of state regulations Slowing American AI progress Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development Undermining economic growth and job creation The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates. Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability. Frequently Asked Questions What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores? The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI. What is the RAISE Act’s current status? The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York. How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition? Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations. This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement. To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption. This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety. Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation. Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about: Data centers driving up utility costs Environmental impacts worsening climate change Chatbots affecting children’s mental health Automation transforming job markets The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs: Requirement Description Penalty Safety Plans Mandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harms Up to $30 million Incident Disclosure Reporting of safety incidents like model theft Civil penalties Risk Prohibition Ban on releasing models with unreasonable risks Legal enforcement Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include: Creating a patchwork of state regulations Slowing American AI progress Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development Undermining economic growth and job creation The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates. Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability. Frequently Asked Questions What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores? The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI. What is the RAISE Act’s current status? The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York. How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition? Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations. This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement. To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption. This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill

Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores' Safety Bill

BitcoinWorld

Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill

In a stunning political confrontation that could reshape America’s AI future, a super PAC backed by Andreessen Horowitz and OpenAI leadership has declared war on New York Assembly member Alex Bores and his groundbreaking AI safety legislation. The battle lines are drawn between Silicon Valley’s ‘move fast and break things’ philosophy and lawmakers demanding basic AI regulation to protect public safety.

Why a16z Super PAC is Targeting AI Regulation Critics

The newly formed Leading the Future super PAC represents a $100 million war chest dedicated to defeating politicians who support AI regulation. Backed by tech titans including Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, and AI search engine Perplexity, the group has made Bores its first political target. This massive financial commitment signals Silicon Valley’s determination to prevent what they call ‘handcuffing’ American AI innovation.

Alex Bores’ Bold Response to Silicon Valley Pressure

Rather than retreating, Bores has embraced the confrontation. ‘I appreciate how straightforward they’re being about it,’ Bores told journalists at a Washington D.C. workshop. When the super PAC threatens to spend millions against him, he forwards their messages directly to constituents. The New York Assembly member, currently running for Congress, represents a district where AI anxieties are rapidly increasing among voters concerned about:

  • Data centers driving up utility costs
  • Environmental impacts worsening climate change
  • Chatbots affecting children’s mental health
  • Automation transforming job markets

The RAISE Act: Comprehensive AI Safety Legislation

At the heart of the conflict stands Bores’ bipartisan RAISE Act, currently awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. This landmark AI regulation represents one of the most comprehensive state-level AI safety frameworks in the nation. The legislation establishes critical requirements for large AI labs:

RequirementDescriptionPenalty
Safety PlansMandatory safety protocols to prevent critical harmsUp to $30 million
Incident DisclosureReporting of safety incidents like model theftCivil penalties
Risk ProhibitionBan on releasing models with unreasonable risksLegal enforcement

Silicon Valley’s Fierce Opposition to AI Safety Measures

Leading the Future executives Zac Moffatt and Josh Vlasto have pledged a ‘multi-billion dollar effort’ to defeat Bores’ campaign. They argue the RAISE Act represents ‘ideological and politically motivated legislation’ that threatens American competitiveness and national security. Their core objections include:

  • Creating a patchwork of state regulations
  • Slowing American AI progress
  • Potentially allowing China to lead global AI development
  • Undermining economic growth and job creation

The Federal vs State AI Regulation Battle Intensifies

Bores defends state-level AI regulation as essential when federal action remains stagnant. ‘The question should be, has Congress solved the problem?’ Bores challenges. ‘If Congress solves the problem, then it can tell the states to get out of the way.’ He argues states function as policy laboratories, moving quickly to address emerging threats while Washington deliberates.

Building Trust Through Responsible AI Regulation

Contrary to industry claims that regulation stifles innovation, Bores positions the RAISE Act as fundamentally pro-innovation. ‘Having basic rules of the road is actually a very pro-innovation stance if done well,’ he asserts. ‘I fundamentally believe that the AI that wins is going to be the AI that is trustworthy.’ This perspective reflects growing public demand for AI systems that prioritize safety alongside capability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What companies are backing the super PAC targeting Alex Bores?
The Leading the Future super PAC receives support from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), OpenAI President Greg Brockman, 8VC managing partner Joe Lonsdale, and Perplexity AI.

What is the RAISE Act’s current status?
The bipartisan RAISE Act has passed the New York legislature and awaits signature by Governor Kathy Hochul. If signed, it would establish comprehensive AI safety requirements for large AI laboratories operating in New York.

How does Alex Bores respond to Silicon Valley opposition?
Assembly member Alex Bores has embraced the confrontation, directly sharing super PAC threats with constituents and arguing that public trust requires reasonable AI safety regulations.

This high-stakes confrontation between a16z’s super PAC and Alex Bores represents a critical moment for AI governance. As billions flow into political campaigns and state legislatures become battlegrounds for AI policy, the outcome will determine whether America prioritizes unchecked innovation or balanced AI regulation that protects public safety while fostering technological advancement.

To learn more about the latest AI regulation trends, explore our article on key developments shaping AI policy and institutional adoption.

This post Explosive AI Regulation Battle: a16z Super PAC Declares War on Alex Bores’ Safety Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
ZKP’s Proof Generation Edge: The $100M Privacy Layer DOGE and XRP Don’t Have

ZKP’s Proof Generation Edge: The $100M Privacy Layer DOGE and XRP Don’t Have

Dogecoin, XRP, and ZKP represent three very different bets for the next cycle,  and the market is already separating speculation from structure. The Dogecoin price
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/22 01:00
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41