ISS told investors to vote against CoreWeave’s $9 billion acquisition of Core Scientific, saying the target can succeed independently.ISS told investors to vote against CoreWeave’s $9 billion acquisition of Core Scientific, saying the target can succeed independently.

ISS opposes $9 billion CoreWeave merger with Core Scientific

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) on Monday told investors to vote against the $9 billion acquisition of Core Scientific by CoreWeave, saying the data-center operator has done well enough on its own and doesn’t need to be absorbed.

The recommendation came ahead of the October 30 vote, and the ISS is warning that Core Scientific has “achieved considerable success as a standalone company” and can keep growing independently, according to Reuters.

The proposed CoreWeave takeover, first announced in early July, was an all-stock offer valued at $20.40 per share, which placed Core Scientific’s worth at about $9 billion. At that time, the deal looked generous, a 66% premium above the company’s market price. But since then, CoreWeave’s stock has fallen while Core Scientific’s price has climbed, flipping the math and leaving shareholders questioning why they should trade up for less.

Investors question CoreWeave’s structure and value

Opposition started building almost immediately. Two Seas Capital said it would vote no, citing “concerns with the sale process, deal structure, and valuation.” The firm argued that the fixed exchange ratio left Core Scientific investors exposed to CoreWeave’s price swings, a risk that’s already materialized.

As the trading floor punished CoreWeave’s stock, the total offer value sank.

Then Trip Miller, head of Gullane Capital in Memphis, added his voice. His firm, which owns $200 million in Core Scientific shares and is the third-largest holder behind Vanguard and BlackRock, said he couldn’t support the deal.

“Under the math of the deal today, I would have to vote no,” Miller said. He called the merger “a flawed structure” that values his shares below their current market price.

Investors seem to agree. After ISS’s call to reject the deal, Core Scientific’s stock rose more than 5% in post-market trading, closing at $18.81, while the conversion deal now values those same shares at just $17, a 10% discount, which proves that markets favor independence.

CoreWeave’s rapid expansion is increasing its debt massively

Since its March IPO, CoreWeave’s market cap has soared to $70 billion, tripling within months as it raced to dominate the AI infrastructure scene.

The company has struck major deals with OpenAI, Microsoft, Meta, and Nvidia, all of which depend on massive computing power. But behind that success is an aggressive expansion financed by heavy borrowing.

In its second-quarter earnings, CEO Michael Intrator said customer demand was so high that the firm needed to build data centers “on a planetary scale.” He said CoreWeave was “aggressively expanding its footprint” to keep up with orders.

The company reported revenue of $1.2 billion, more than double from a year earlier, and a revenue backlog of $30.1 billion, also twice what it was at the start of the year. But its operating margin dropped from 20% to 2%, showing how costs are eating into profits.

The company also revealed that its debt hit $11.2 billion by the end of Q2, a 40% jump since January, with borrowing costs between 7% and 15%. It’s currently running 470 megawatts of data-center capacity and aims to exceed 900 megawatts by late 2025, enough to power about one-fifth of New York City.

If the Core Scientific acquisition went through, that figure would more than double its operational output and push future contracted power above 3 gigawatts.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Market Opportunity
Core DAO Logo
Core DAO Price(CORE)
$0.1087
$0.1087$0.1087
-1.71%
USD
Core DAO (CORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges

The post Shiba Inu Supply Shrinks as 167,991,300,000 SHIB Exit Exchanges appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. -167,991,300,000 SHIB in exchange netflow Shiba Inu
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/01 04:42
Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Kan de Solana koers naar $129 door grote SOL ETF instroom en hoge netwerkinkomsten?

Solana sluit 2025 af met meer dan $1,5 miljard aan netwerkinkomsten. Daarmee laat het netwerk Ethereum en Hyperliquid samen achter zich. Deze cijfers van Blockworks
Share
Coinstats2026/01/01 03:16
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41