The post OpenAI Sought Government Loan Guarantees Days Before Sam Altman’s Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Sam Altman stated on November 6 that OpenAI “does not have or want government guarantees” for its data centers. That claim came in response to CFO Sarah Friar’s earlier comment suggesting a federal “backstop” could help finance AI infrastructure—remarks she quickly retracted. A letter OpenAI sent to the White House on October 27 directly contradicts Altman’s denial, explicitly requesting loan guarantees and other federal financial support for AI infrastructure. OpenAI explicitly requested federal loan guarantees for AI infrastructure in an October 27 letter to the White House—which kindly refused the offer, with AI czar David Sacks saying that at least 5 other companies could take OpenAI’s place—directly contradicting CEO Sam Altman’s public statements claiming the company doesn’t want government support. The 11-page letter, submitted to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, called for expanding tax credits and deploying “grants, cost-sharing agreements, loans, or loan guarantees to expand industrial base capacity” for AI data centers and grid components. The letter detailed how “direct funding could also help shorten lead times for critical grid components—transformers, HVDC converters, switchgear, and cables—from years to months.” “Initial investments could be made using existing authorities such as the Defense Production Act Title III and the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office,” OpenAI said. Just 10 days later, on November 6, Altman posted on X that “we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI data centers,” adding that “taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions.” I would like to clarify a few things. First, the obvious one: we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI datacenters. We believe that governments should not pick winners or losers, and that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions or… — Sam Altman (@sama) November 6,… The post OpenAI Sought Government Loan Guarantees Days Before Sam Altman’s Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Sam Altman stated on November 6 that OpenAI “does not have or want government guarantees” for its data centers. That claim came in response to CFO Sarah Friar’s earlier comment suggesting a federal “backstop” could help finance AI infrastructure—remarks she quickly retracted. A letter OpenAI sent to the White House on October 27 directly contradicts Altman’s denial, explicitly requesting loan guarantees and other federal financial support for AI infrastructure. OpenAI explicitly requested federal loan guarantees for AI infrastructure in an October 27 letter to the White House—which kindly refused the offer, with AI czar David Sacks saying that at least 5 other companies could take OpenAI’s place—directly contradicting CEO Sam Altman’s public statements claiming the company doesn’t want government support. The 11-page letter, submitted to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, called for expanding tax credits and deploying “grants, cost-sharing agreements, loans, or loan guarantees to expand industrial base capacity” for AI data centers and grid components. The letter detailed how “direct funding could also help shorten lead times for critical grid components—transformers, HVDC converters, switchgear, and cables—from years to months.” “Initial investments could be made using existing authorities such as the Defense Production Act Title III and the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office,” OpenAI said. Just 10 days later, on November 6, Altman posted on X that “we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI data centers,” adding that “taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions.” I would like to clarify a few things. First, the obvious one: we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI datacenters. We believe that governments should not pick winners or losers, and that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions or… — Sam Altman (@sama) November 6,…

OpenAI Sought Government Loan Guarantees Days Before Sam Altman’s Denial

In brief

  • Sam Altman stated on November 6 that OpenAI “does not have or want government guarantees” for its data centers.
  • That claim came in response to CFO Sarah Friar’s earlier comment suggesting a federal “backstop” could help finance AI infrastructure—remarks she quickly retracted.
  • A letter OpenAI sent to the White House on October 27 directly contradicts Altman’s denial, explicitly requesting loan guarantees and other federal financial support for AI infrastructure.

OpenAI explicitly requested federal loan guarantees for AI infrastructure in an October 27 letter to the White House—which kindly refused the offer, with AI czar David Sacks saying that at least 5 other companies could take OpenAI’s place—directly contradicting CEO Sam Altman’s public statements claiming the company doesn’t want government support.

The 11-page letter, submitted to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, called for expanding tax credits and deploying “grants, cost-sharing agreements, loans, or loan guarantees to expand industrial base capacity” for AI data centers and grid components. The letter detailed how “direct funding could also help shorten lead times for critical grid components—transformers, HVDC converters, switchgear, and cables—from years to months.”

“Initial investments could be made using existing authorities such as the Defense Production Act Title III and the Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office,” OpenAI said.

Just 10 days later, on November 6, Altman posted on X that “we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI data centers,” adding that “taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions.”

The contradiction emerged after OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar told a Wall Street Journal event on November 5 that a federal “backstop” could help lower financing costs and increase debt capacity for AI infrastructure.

Her comments triggered fierce backlash. For example, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis tweeted that the government should not bail out tech companies. Sacks wrote that “there will be no federal bailout for AI.”

Friar quickly walked back her comments on LinkedIn, saying OpenAI wasn’t seeking a government backstop for infrastructure commitments.

“I want to clarify my comments earlier today. OpenAI is not seeking a government backstop for our infrastructure commitments. I used the word ‘backstop’ and it muddied the point,” she wrote. “As the full clip of my answer shows, I was making the point that American strength in technology will come from building real industrial capacity, which requires the private sector and government playing their part.”

Altman’s lengthy X post the next day amplified this message. “Our CFO talked about government financing yesterday, and then later clarified her point, underscoring that she could have phrased things more clearly. As mentioned above, we think that the U.S. government should have a national strategy for its own AI infrastructure,” his tweet reads.

Of course, this move also generated backlash.

AI researcher Gary Marcus published the October 27 letter, calling Altman’s denial “lying his ass off” and noting the letter explicitly requested the very loan guarantees Altman claimed not to want. The letter remains publicly available on OpenAI’s content delivery network.

This isn’t the first time Altman’s statements have faced scrutiny. OpenAI’s board briefly fired him in November 2023 for being “not consistently candid,” according to the board’s statement. Former board member Helen Toner later detailed on a podcast how Altman had withheld information and made it difficult for the board to fulfill its oversight duties. A recent deposition from former OpenAI Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, who voted to remove Altman, further documented concerns about his candor.

OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the October 27 letter or the apparent contradiction with Altman’s statements.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source: https://decrypt.co/347866/openai-sought-government-loan-guarantees-sam-altman-denial

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005403
$0.0005403$0.0005403
-0.64%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Cappfinity is pleased to announce the promotion of Stephanie Hopper to the role of Chief Talent Management Officer, marking
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 15:30
TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

The post TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX is consolidating at the $0.31 level while showing a short-term bullish tendency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 15:27