The post Philippine businesses slow to adopt AI, study shows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Philippine businesses slow to adopt AI, study shows Philippine businesses remain slow in adopting artificial intelligence (AI) despite widespread access to computers and the Internet, according to a study by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). The new study found that adoption is concentrated among larger firms in urban centers, particularly in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sectors, leaving most industries and regions behind. The study reported that “in the Philippines, the integration of AI into business and industry is still in its nascent stages, with the country ranking below average in AI readiness compared to other Asia-Pacific nations.” According to the 2023 Asia-Pacific AI Readiness Index, “the Philippines ranks 12th out of the 12 countries included in the index, with an overall AI Readiness score of 35.7 out of 100.” Business readiness is also low: “In terms of business readiness, the Philippines (25.4) ranks 10th out of 12 countries with a score of 25.4 out of 100.” The study, entitled Readiness for AI Adoption of Philippine Business and Industry: The Government’s Role in Fostering Innovation- and AI-Driven Industrial Development, highlighted a gap between basic and advanced technology use. It noted that “while basic digital infrastructure is widespread, with 90.8 percent of establishments having computers and 81 percent having internet access, advanced technology adoption remains limited.” Only “21.7%” of establishments have websites and “31.2%” engage in e-commerce. AI adoption rates remain low and concentrated “When it comes to specific AI adoption, the paper reports that 14.9 percent of firms use AI and ML technologies.” This places the Philippines behind other technologies: “This places AI as the fourth most adopted FIRe technology, behind Internet of Things (IoT), 5G networks, and automation.” Overall uptake remains low: “The overall adoption… The post Philippine businesses slow to adopt AI, study shows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Philippine businesses slow to adopt AI, study shows Philippine businesses remain slow in adopting artificial intelligence (AI) despite widespread access to computers and the Internet, according to a study by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). The new study found that adoption is concentrated among larger firms in urban centers, particularly in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sectors, leaving most industries and regions behind. The study reported that “in the Philippines, the integration of AI into business and industry is still in its nascent stages, with the country ranking below average in AI readiness compared to other Asia-Pacific nations.” According to the 2023 Asia-Pacific AI Readiness Index, “the Philippines ranks 12th out of the 12 countries included in the index, with an overall AI Readiness score of 35.7 out of 100.” Business readiness is also low: “In terms of business readiness, the Philippines (25.4) ranks 10th out of 12 countries with a score of 25.4 out of 100.” The study, entitled Readiness for AI Adoption of Philippine Business and Industry: The Government’s Role in Fostering Innovation- and AI-Driven Industrial Development, highlighted a gap between basic and advanced technology use. It noted that “while basic digital infrastructure is widespread, with 90.8 percent of establishments having computers and 81 percent having internet access, advanced technology adoption remains limited.” Only “21.7%” of establishments have websites and “31.2%” engage in e-commerce. AI adoption rates remain low and concentrated “When it comes to specific AI adoption, the paper reports that 14.9 percent of firms use AI and ML technologies.” This places the Philippines behind other technologies: “This places AI as the fourth most adopted FIRe technology, behind Internet of Things (IoT), 5G networks, and automation.” Overall uptake remains low: “The overall adoption…

Philippine businesses slow to adopt AI, study shows

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Philippine businesses remain slow in adopting artificial intelligence (AI) despite widespread access to computers and the Internet, according to a study by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). The new study found that adoption is concentrated among larger firms in urban centers, particularly in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sectors, leaving most industries and regions behind.

The study reported that “in the Philippines, the integration of AI into business and industry is still in its nascent stages, with the country ranking below average in AI readiness compared to other Asia-Pacific nations.”

According to the 2023 Asia-Pacific AI Readiness Index, “the Philippines ranks 12th out of the 12 countries included in the index, with an overall AI Readiness score of 35.7 out of 100.”

Business readiness is also low: “In terms of business readiness, the Philippines (25.4) ranks 10th out of 12 countries with a score of 25.4 out of 100.”

The study, entitled Readiness for AI Adoption of Philippine Business and Industry: The Government’s Role in Fostering Innovation- and AI-Driven Industrial Development, highlighted a gap between basic and advanced technology use. It noted that “while basic digital infrastructure is widespread, with 90.8 percent of establishments having computers and 81 percent having internet access, advanced technology adoption remains limited.” Only “21.7%” of establishments have websites and “31.2%” engage in e-commerce.

AI adoption rates remain low and concentrated

“When it comes to specific AI adoption, the paper reports that 14.9 percent of firms use AI and ML technologies.” This places the Philippines behind other technologies: “This places AI as the fourth most adopted FIRe technology, behind Internet of Things (IoT), 5G networks, and automation.”

Overall uptake remains low: “The overall adoption rate of AI across industries was 3.02 percent in 2021.” Moreover, “Only 14.9 percent of firms use AI technologies, with adoption concentrated in urban areas and larger firms, particularly in the ICT and BPO sectors.”

Regional data shows imbalances. “The regional distribution of AI adopters reveals disparities, with National Capital Region, Region VI (Western Visayas) and Region IVA (CALABARZON) leading with 25.4, 14.3 and 11.8 percent respectively.” But “less urbanized areas like the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM), Region IVB (MIMAROPA) and Region XI (Davao Region) lag, indicating possible a widening of digital divide in the future.”

Source: Readiness for AI Adoption of Philippine Business and Industry: The Government’s Role in Fostering Innovation- and AI-Driven Industrial Development

Firm size also matters. “The rate of adoption by employment size confirms that large enterprises, with a rate of 5.29 percent, surpass micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs).” By sector, “The BPO and ICT industry leads with a rate of 7.19 percent and 5.94 percent, respectively, significantly higher than agriculture at 1.55 percent.”

Back to the top ↑

Key barriers for businesses

According to the study, key barriers for local businesses include limited digital infrastructure, low awareness of AI technologies, significant skills gaps, and insufficient funding opportunities.

“Overall awareness of FIRe technologies, including AI, is relatively low among Philippine firms, with only about 1 in 5 firms are aware of these technologies,” The study said. It also identified education gaps. “The quality of Engineering and Technology Higher Education score of 0.00 indicates weaknesses in the education system for developing a skilled AI workforce.”

Human capital scores reinforce this weakness.

“The country faces substantial challenges in human capital development, as evidenced by its low score of 31.42 in the Human Capital dimension of the Oxford AI Readiness Index.” The study highlighted “low scores in ICT skills (5.08) and Quality of Engineering and Technology Higher Education (0.00), suggesting a significant skills gap in the workforce.”

Infrastructure challenges remain a bottleneck. “Supercomputers (0.00) are entirely lacking, which limits the country’s capacity to process large AI datasets and conduct complex AI research.” Investment is also scarce. “Limited funding opportunities present another significant barrier to AI adoption, with the country scoring only 6.00 in Venture Capital Availability according to the Asia Pacific AI Readiness Index.” This score was described as “extremely low, signaling a lack of funding opportunities for AI startups and innovation.”

Back to the top ↑

Government initiatives and role

However, policymakers have taken steps to address these gaps. “The government has also started to take steps towards enhancing AI adoption, as seen in the development of the National AI Roadmap, which aims to establish the country as a hub for AI research and development in Southeast Asia.”

“The DTI [Department of Trade and Industry] estimates that AI could boost the Philippine GDP [gross domestic product] by 12 percent or about $92 billion by 2030.” In 2021, the agency launched the National AI Strategy Roadmap, “aiming to position the Philippines as an AI Center for Excellence in the region.”

The country scored well in some policy dimensions. “Among the highest scores, Vision (100.00) demonstrates the government’s strong strategic direction for AI, while Data Protection and Privacy Laws (100.00) reflect a solid framework for safeguarding personal data, which is an essential component for building public trust in AI systems,” the study said.

But gaps remain in ethics. “The absence of Ethical Principles (0.00) for AI indicates a gap in guidelines necessary for responsible AI development.” The Philippines also scored just 0.12 in the “Regulation and Ethics dimension.” The study emphasized that the government’s role includes “market facilitation, capability building, and ecosystem coordination.”

Back to the top ↑

Business examples highlight potential

Where adoption is taking root, companies are reporting results. The BPO industry has been at the forefront of AI adoption, implementing chatbots, natural language processing, and automated customer service solutions.

UnionBank has deployed AI across operations. Its fraud detection systems “enabled UnionBank to detect 19 percent more fraudulent transactions and achieve an 80 percent reduction in the turnaround time for identifying these transactions.” An AI credit scoring system “resulted in the doubling of the bank’s loan approval rate making financial services more accessible especially for the unbanked and underbanked.”

In retail, Lazada’s whitepaper reveals 88% of consumers use AI recommendations to make purchasing choices, and 83% are open to paying for experiences enhanced by AI.

Utilities have also explored applications. AI is a critical component of Maynilad’s Non-Revenue Water (NRW) Management Program, which aims to reduce water losses and improve supply reliability across the West Zone.

Manufacturing is testing generative AI. Mitsubishi Motors Philippine Corporation (MMPC) is redesigning its employee portal with IBM’s (NASDAQ: IBM) watsonx.ai, utilizing GenAI to enhance the employee experience and provide faster responses to inquiries by analyzing internal documentation.

Telecommunications firms are among the largest adopters. “PLDT’s Conversational AI system, powered by a natural language processor (NLP), enables automated customer interactions, such as bill payment reminders and account verification.” The company also uses Wiz AI’s Talkbot Pro, “an AI-powered voice assistant that conducted 3.7 million outbound communications and cut average call handling time from six to three minutes in its first year.”

According to the report, businesses in general have reported benefiting from the AI and machine learning applications through reductions in cost and increased efficiency in business operations.

In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek’s coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI.

Back to the top ↑

Watch: The Philippines is moving toward blockchain-enabled tech

title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen=””>

Source: https://coingeek.com/philippine-businesses-slow-to-adopt-ai-study-shows/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

UNI Price Prediction: Testing $4.17 Upper Band Resistance, Targets $4.50 by April 2026

Uniswap trades at $3.88 with neutral RSI at 51.98. Technical analysis suggests potential breakout to $4.17 upper Bollinger Band, with bullish targets reaching $
Share
BlockChain News2026/03/12 17:21
Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Speed, Cost, and Intelligence: How Kie.ai’s Gemini 3 Flash API Balances Performance and Budget for Developers

Integrating AI into applications is a balancing act between performance, cost, and intelligence. Traditionally, high-performance AI models come with steep costs
Share
Techbullion2026/03/12 16:55
Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Cash Flow Valuation HyperLiquid: Could $HYPE Reach $385 in Five Years?

Author: G3ronimo Compiled by: TechFlow HyperLiquid has grown into a mature crypto-native exchange, with the majority of its net fees programmatically distributed directly to token holders through an "Assistance Fund" (AF). This design makes $HYPE one of the few tokens capable of being valued based on cash flow. To date, most valuations of HyperLiquid have relied on traditional multiples, comparing it to established financial platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood, using EBITDA or revenue multiples as a reference. Unlike traditional corporate stocks, where management typically retains and reinvests earnings at their discretion, HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of transaction fees directly to token holders through a support fund. This model creates predictable and quantifiable cash flows, making it well-suited for detailed discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis rather than static multiple comparisons. Our methodology begins by determining $HYPE's cost of capital. We then invert the current market price to determine the market-implied future earnings. Finally, we apply growth projections to these earnings streams and compare the resulting intrinsic value to today's market price, revealing the valuation gap between current pricing and fundamental value. Why choose discounted cash flow (DCF) over a multiple? While other valuation methods compare HyperLiquid to Coinbase and Robinhood via EBITDA multiples, these methods have the following limitations: The difference between the corporate and token structures: Coinbase and Robinhood are corporate stocks, whose capital allocation is guided by the board of directors, and profits are retained and reinvested by management; while HyperLiquid systematically returns 93% of trading fees directly to token holders through a relief fund. Direct Cash Flow: HyperLiquid's design generates predictable cash flows that are well-suited to DCF models, rather than static multiples. Growth and risk characteristics: DCFs are able to explicitly model different growth scenarios and risk adjustments, whereas multiples may not adequately capture growth and risk dynamics. Determining an appropriate discount rate To determine our cost of equity, we start with reference data from the public market and adjust for cryptocurrency-specific risks: Cost of equity (r) ≈ Risk-free rate + β × Market risk premium + Crypto/illiquidity premium Beta Analysis Based on regression analysis with the S&P 500: Robinhood (HOOD): Beta of 2.5, implied cost of equity of 15.6%; Coinbase (COIN): Beta of 2.0, implied cost of equity of 13.6%; HyperLiquid (HYPE): Beta is 1.38 and the implied cost of equity is 10.5%. At first glance, $HYPE appears to have a lower beta, and therefore a lower cost of equity than Robinhood and Coinbase. However, the R² value reveals an important limitation: HOOD: The S&P 500 explains 50% of its returns; COIN: The S&P 500 explains 34% of its return; HYPE: The S&P 500 only explains 5% of its returns. $HYPE’s low R² suggests that traditional stock market factors are insufficient to explain its price fluctuations, and crypto-native risk factors need to be considered. risk assessment Despite $HYPE’s lower beta, we still adjust its discount rate from 10.5% to 13% (which is more conservative compared to COIN’s 13.6% and HOOD’s 15.6%) for the following reasons: Lower governance risk: Direct programmatic distribution of 93% of fees reduces concerns about corporate governance. In contrast, COIN and HOOD do not return any earnings to shareholders, and their capital allocation is determined by management. Higher Market Risk: $HYPE is a crypto-native asset and is subject to additional regulatory and technological uncertainties. Liquidity considerations: Token markets are generally less liquid than established stock markets. Get the Market Implied Price (MIP) Using our 13% discount rate, we can reverse engineer the market’s implied earnings expectations at the current $HYPE token price of approximately $54: Current market expectations: 2025: Total revenue of $700 million 2026: Total revenue of $1.4 billion Terminal growth: 3% annual growth thereafter These assumptions yield an intrinsic value of approximately $54, which is consistent with current market prices. This suggests that the market is pricing in modest growth based on current fee levels. At this point we need to ask a question: Does the market-implied price (MIP) reflect future cash flows? Alternative growth scenarios @Keisan_Crypto presents an attractive 2-year and 5-year bull market scenario. Original tweet link: Click here Two-year bull market forecast According to @Keisan_Crypto’s analysis, if HyperLiquid achieves the following goals: Annualized fees: $3.6 billion Aid fund income: $3.35 billion (93% of fees) Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $128 (140% undervalued at current price) Related links Five-year bull market scenario Under a five-year bull market scenario (link), he predicts that transaction fees will reach $10 billion annually, with $9.3 billion accruing to $HYPE. He assumes HyperLiquid's global market share will grow from its current 5% to 50% by 2030. Even if it doesn't reach 50% market share, these figures are still achievable with a smaller market share as global trading volumes continue to grow. Five-year bull market forecast Annualized fees: $10 billion Aid fund income: $9.3 billion Result: HYPE's intrinsic value is $385 (600% undervalued at current price) Related links While this valuation is lower than Keisan's $1,000 target, the difference stems from our assumption of normalized earnings growth at 3% annually thereafter, while Keisan's model uses a cash flow multiple. We believe using cash flow multiples to project long-term value is problematic, as market multiples are volatile and can vary significantly over time. Furthermore, the multiples themselves incorporate earnings growth assumptions, while using the same cash flow multiple five years from now as one or two years later implies that growth levels from 2030 onward will be consistent with those in 2026/2027. Therefore, the multiples are more appropriate for short-term asset pricing. However, regardless of which model is used, $HYPE remains undervalued; this is a subtle difference. Additional Value Driver: USDH Under the Native Market model, USDH will use 50% of its stablecoin revenue for buybacks similar to a bailout fund. As a result, $HYPE can increase its free cash flow by $100 million (50% of $200 million) annually. Looking ahead five years, if USDH's market capitalization reaches $25 billion (currently still one-third of USDC's, and an even smaller portion of the total stablecoin market five years from now), its annual revenue could reach $1 billion. Following the same 50% distribution model, this would generate an additional $500 million in free cash flow per year for the aid fund. This would value each token at over $400. Excluding Value Drivers: HIP-3 and HyperEVM This DCF analysis intentionally excludes two important potential value drivers that are not amenable to cash flow modeling. Clearly, these would provide additional incremental value and could therefore be evaluated separately using different valuation methodologies and then added to this valuation. Summarize Our DCF analysis indicates that if HyperLiquid can maintain its growth trajectory and market position, the $HYPE token is significantly undervalued. The token's unique feature of programmatic fee distribution makes it particularly suitable for cash flow-based valuation methodologies. Methodological Notes This analysis builds on research by @Keisan_Crypto and @GLC_Research. The DCF model is open source and can be modified at the following link: https://valypto.xyz/project/hyperliquid/oNQraQIg Market data and forecasts are subject to change, and models should be updated promptly based on the latest information.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 08:00