The post Season 4 Of ‘The Witcher’ Is Over Budget And Has The Highest Costs According To Netflix appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Liam Hemsworth’s debut season as the Witcher is the most expensive yet Netflix Netflix revealed yesterday that the fourth season of The Witcher is over-budget and cost more to make than any other instalment in the sword and sorcery series. The fourth season is due to debut next month and has courted controversy for its casting. Australian hunk Liam Hemsworth has replaced fan favorite Henry Cavill in the title role sparking strong criticism of the first footage from the new season which was released last week. There is a lot on the line. Saying that The Witcher is one of Netflix’s most popular shows is somewhat of an understatement. When the first season premiered in 2019 it became the streamer’s most-watched original series launch with 541 million hours viewed in its first 28 days. It went on to amass more than 1.2 billion hours of viewing so although it doesn’t come cheap, it is money well spent. As this report explained, every season of The Witcher and its prequel Blood Origin have been made in the United Kingdom where studios benefit from a 25.5% reimbursement of the production costs incurred in the country. Part of the reimbursement process involves the studio setting up a production company in the U.K. for each programme that it makes there. The companies all have to file financial statements showing everything from the headcount and salaries to the total costs and the level of the reimbursement. Hemsworth is replacing Henry Cavill for Season 4 Netflix The filings are legally binding so there is no doubt about their accuracy. Likewise, the terms of the reimbursement say that the financial statements have to show the production’s entire costs, not just those incurred in the U.K. Furthermore, studios aren’t allowed to hide costs in other companies as the… The post Season 4 Of ‘The Witcher’ Is Over Budget And Has The Highest Costs According To Netflix appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Liam Hemsworth’s debut season as the Witcher is the most expensive yet Netflix Netflix revealed yesterday that the fourth season of The Witcher is over-budget and cost more to make than any other instalment in the sword and sorcery series. The fourth season is due to debut next month and has courted controversy for its casting. Australian hunk Liam Hemsworth has replaced fan favorite Henry Cavill in the title role sparking strong criticism of the first footage from the new season which was released last week. There is a lot on the line. Saying that The Witcher is one of Netflix’s most popular shows is somewhat of an understatement. When the first season premiered in 2019 it became the streamer’s most-watched original series launch with 541 million hours viewed in its first 28 days. It went on to amass more than 1.2 billion hours of viewing so although it doesn’t come cheap, it is money well spent. As this report explained, every season of The Witcher and its prequel Blood Origin have been made in the United Kingdom where studios benefit from a 25.5% reimbursement of the production costs incurred in the country. Part of the reimbursement process involves the studio setting up a production company in the U.K. for each programme that it makes there. The companies all have to file financial statements showing everything from the headcount and salaries to the total costs and the level of the reimbursement. Hemsworth is replacing Henry Cavill for Season 4 Netflix The filings are legally binding so there is no doubt about their accuracy. Likewise, the terms of the reimbursement say that the financial statements have to show the production’s entire costs, not just those incurred in the U.K. Furthermore, studios aren’t allowed to hide costs in other companies as the…

Season 4 Of ‘The Witcher’ Is Over Budget And Has The Highest Costs According To Netflix

Liam Hemsworth’s debut season as the Witcher is the most expensive yet

Netflix

Netflix revealed yesterday that the fourth season of The Witcher is over-budget and cost more to make than any other instalment in the sword and sorcery series.

The fourth season is due to debut next month and has courted controversy for its casting. Australian hunk Liam Hemsworth has replaced fan favorite Henry Cavill in the title role sparking strong criticism of the first footage from the new season which was released last week. There is a lot on the line.

Saying that The Witcher is one of Netflix’s most popular shows is somewhat of an understatement. When the first season premiered in 2019 it became the streamer’s most-watched original series launch with 541 million hours viewed in its first 28 days. It went on to amass more than 1.2 billion hours of viewing so although it doesn’t come cheap, it is money well spent.

As this report explained, every season of The Witcher and its prequel Blood Origin have been made in the United Kingdom where studios benefit from a 25.5% reimbursement of the production costs incurred in the country. Part of the reimbursement process involves the studio setting up a production company in the U.K. for each programme that it makes there. The companies all have to file financial statements showing everything from the headcount and salaries to the total costs and the level of the reimbursement.

Hemsworth is replacing Henry Cavill for Season 4

Netflix

The filings are legally binding so there is no doubt about their accuracy. Likewise, the terms of the reimbursement say that the financial statements have to show the production’s entire costs, not just those incurred in the U.K. Furthermore, studios aren’t allowed to hide costs in other companies as the terms also state that there can only be one production company per programme.

The financial statements are released in stages long after the period they relate to. This starts during pre-production and continues after the premiere to give the production team time to ensure that all the bills are paid. It explains why the company behind the second season of The Witcher is still booking costs in its financial statements even though it debuted back in 2021.

Filings released yesterday reveal that it incurred $448,822 (£357,197) of costs during the year to December 31, 2024 while the Netflix subsidiary which is making the fifth season of The Witcher spent $13.4 million (£10.6 million) on pre-production ahead of the start of filming in March this year.

However, the biggest revelation was that the production company behind the fourth season spent a staggering $178.2 million (£141.8 million) last year when all the filming took place along with several months of pre-production and post-production. It brought the total costs of season four to $220.4 million (£175 million) which is higher than any other instalment (see chart below) with months of post-production still remaining after the December 31 date of the financial statements.

Shooting Higher: The Rising Costs Of ‘The Witcher’

Caroline Reid using Flourish

Its staff costs alone came to $24.5 million (£19.4 million) with employee numbers peaking at a monthly average of 309 people last year without even counting freelancers, contractors and temporary workers as they aren’t listed as employees on the books of U.K. companies even though they often represent the majority of the crew.

The financial statements reveal that “the total cost of the programme was in excess of the budgeted costs” though it also received a $56.5 million (£44.9 million) reimbursement bringing the net spending down to $163.9 million. Not only was this higher than the net spending on any other instalment of The Witcher, it was also more than double the net spending of season one. The fourth season drops on October 30, just in time for Halloween, so we will soon find out if it was money well spent.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinereid/2025/09/21/season-4-of-the-witcher-is-over-budget-and-has-the-highest-costs-according-to-netflix/

Market Opportunity
Sidekick Logo
Sidekick Price(K)
$0.006189
$0.006189$0.006189
-9.03%
USD
Sidekick (K) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC

The post Franklin Templeton CEO Dismisses 50bps Rate Cut Ahead FOMC appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Franklin Templeton CEO Jenny Johnson has weighed in on whether the Federal Reserve should make a 25 basis points (bps) Fed rate cut or 50 bps cut. This comes ahead of the Fed decision today at today’s FOMC meeting, with the market pricing in a 25 bps cut. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market are currently trading flat ahead of the rate cut decision. Franklin Templeton CEO Weighs In On Potential FOMC Decision In a CNBC interview, Jenny Johnson said that she expects the Fed to make a 25 bps cut today instead of a 50 bps cut. She acknowledged the jobs data, which suggested that the labor market is weakening. However, she noted that this data is backward-looking, indicating that it doesn’t show the current state of the economy. She alluded to the wage growth, which she remarked is an indication of a robust labor market. She added that retail sales are up and that consumers are still spending, despite inflation being sticky at 3%, which makes a case for why the FOMC should opt against a 50-basis-point Fed rate cut. In line with this, the Franklin Templeton CEO said that she would go with a 25 bps rate cut if she were Jerome Powell. She remarked that the Fed still has the October and December FOMC meetings to make further cuts if the incoming data warrants it. Johnson also asserted that the data show a robust economy. However, she noted that there can’t be an argument for no Fed rate cut since Powell already signaled at Jackson Hole that they were likely to lower interest rates at this meeting due to concerns over a weakening labor market. Notably, her comment comes as experts argue for both sides on why the Fed should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:36
[Tambay] Tres niños na bagitos

[Tambay] Tres niños na bagitos

Mga bagong lublób sa malupit na mundo ng Philippine politics ang mga newbies na sina Leviste, Barzaga, at San Fernando, kaya madalas nakakangilo ang kanilang ikinikilos
Share
Rappler2026/01/18 10:00
Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto

Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto

The post Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/18 10:41