MAS defers prudential standards for bank crypto exposures, citing concerns over permissionless blockchain treatmentMAS defers prudential standards for bank crypto exposures, citing concerns over permissionless blockchain treatment

Singapore Delays Bank Crypto Asset Rules to 2027 Amid Industry Pushback

2025/10/13 18:30
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
Singapore Delays Bank Crypto Asset Rules to 2027 Amid Industry Pushback

Singapore's central bank has postponed implementation of prudential rules governing how banks treat cryptocurrency exposures to 2027 or later, following industry feedback that the proposed standards would disadvantage the jurisdiction and stifle innovation.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) originally planned to implement the Basel Committee's cryptoasset standards from January 2026, aligning with international timelines. However, banks warned the early adoption would create regulatory arbitrage as other jurisdictions delayed similar rules.

"MAS will defer the implementation of the prudential treatment and disclosures of cryptoasset exposures to 1 January 2027 or later and will provide updates on the final cryptoasset standards and implementation date in due course," the regulator said in its response to consultation feedback.

The proposed rules would have required banks to hold capital against cryptocurrency exposures based on a classification system dividing digital assets into groups with different risk weights. Group 2 cryptoassets, including most cryptocurrencies on permissionless blockchains, would face a punitive 1,250% risk weight, effectively making such exposures prohibitively expensive for banks.

Industry respondents argued the classification conditions were "punitive and not technologically neutral," particularly for assets operating on permissionless blockchains. Banks contended the conservative treatment would push cryptoasset activities outside regulatory perimeters rather than achieving the intended prudential objectives.

"While respondents acknowledged that cryptoassets operating on permissionless blockchains could introduce novel risks compared to traditional assets, they expressed that such cryptoassets should not be precluded from being treated as Group 1 cryptoassets," MAS noted in its feedback response.

The delay allows MAS to consider technological advances including Layer 2 solutions that could potentially mitigate risks from permissionless blockchains. The regulator also acknowledged the need for greater international alignment on eligible reserve assets for Group 1b cryptoassets, particularly affecting stablecoin treatment.

"MAS recognises that since the publication of the cryptoasset standards, there have been advances in implementation practices (including technological safeguards through layer 2 solutions) which could potentially help mitigate the risks arising from the use of permissionless blockchains," the central bank and regulator stated.

During the interim period until implementation, banks with existing or planned cryptocurrency exposures must notify and engage MAS on appropriate prudential treatment. The regulator expects banks to apply treatment "largely aligned" with the consulted proposals.

The consultation also addressed treatment of stablecoins, with mixed industry views on whether cash or securities from repurchase agreements and similar transactions should qualify as eligible reserve assets. Some respondents proposed expanding eligible reserves to include money market instruments.

MAS indicated it would continue monitoring cryptoasset landscape developments and global regulatory progress "with a view towards promoting harmonisation in the implementation of the cryptoasset standards internationally and ensuring the appropriateness of the prudential standards."

The delay represents a significant concession to Singapore's financial industry, which has positioned the city-state as a crypto-friendly hub while maintaining strict regulatory oversight. Banks warned that implementing Basel standards ahead of other jurisdictions could disadvantage Singapore-based institutions in global competition.

Separately, MAS finalized rules requiring banks to exclude retail investors from purchasing Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital instruments, taking effect January 2026. The changes aim to protect retail investors from complex, loss-absorbing securities while maintaining banks' ability to issue regulatory capital to institutional investors.

The capital instrument rules clarify that banks need not track secondary market transactions but must ensure sale agreements with intermediaries prohibit onward sales to Singapore retail investors. Existing AT1 and Tier 2 instruments held by retail investors before January 2026 will be grandfathered indefinitely, MAS said.

➢ Stay ahead of the curve. Join Blockhead on Telegram today for all the latest in crypto.
+ Follow Blockhead on Google News
Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.03971
$0.03971$0.03971
+0.73%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Solana Overtakes Ethereum In Trillion-Dollar Sector, Is There A New King In Town?

Solana Overtakes Ethereum In Trillion-Dollar Sector, Is There A New King In Town?

Solana has overtaken Ethereum in terms of total real-world asset (RWA) holders, providing a positive sign for the network. However, Ethereum remains ahead in total
Share
Bitcoinist2026/03/12 01:00
Shiba Inu Price Steady as Kusama’s X Silence Sparks Speculation

Shiba Inu Price Steady as Kusama’s X Silence Sparks Speculation

The post Shiba Inu Price Steady as Kusama’s X Silence Sparks Speculation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Shiba Inu price remains steady as the community
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 01:41
Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse?

Whales offload 200 million XRP leaving market uncertainty behind. XRP faces potential collapse as whales drive major price shifts. Is XRP’s future in danger after massive sell-off by whales? XRP’s price has been under intense pressure recently as whales reportedly offloaded a staggering 200 million XRP over the past two weeks. This massive sell-off has raised alarms across the cryptocurrency community, as many wonder if the market is on the brink of collapse or just undergoing a temporary correction. According to crypto analyst Ali (@ali_charts), this surge in whale activity correlates directly with the price fluctuations seen in the past few weeks. XRP experienced a sharp spike in late July and early August, but the price quickly reversed as whales began to sell their holdings in large quantities. The increased volume during this period highlights the intensity of the sell-off, leaving many traders to question the future of XRP’s value. Whales have offloaded around 200 million $XRP in the last two weeks! pic.twitter.com/MiSQPpDwZM — Ali (@ali_charts) September 17, 2025 Also Read: Shiba Inu’s Price Is at a Tipping Point: Will It Break or Crash Soon? Can XRP Recover or Is a Bigger Decline Ahead? As the market absorbs the effects of the whale offload, technical indicators suggest that XRP may be facing a period of consolidation. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), currently sitting at 53.05, signals a neutral market stance, indicating that XRP could move in either direction. This leaves traders uncertain whether the XRP will break above its current resistance levels or continue to fall as more whales sell off their holdings. Source: Tradingview Additionally, the Bollinger Bands, suggest that XRP is nearing the upper limits of its range. This often points to a potential slowdown or pullback in price, further raising concerns about the future direction of the XRP. With the price currently around $3.02, many are questioning whether XRP can regain its footing or if it will continue to decline. The Aftermath of Whale Activity: Is XRP’s Future in Danger? Despite the large sell-off, XRP is not yet showing signs of total collapse. However, the market remains fragile, and the price is likely to remain volatile in the coming days. With whales continuing to influence price movements, many investors are watching closely to see if this trend will reverse or intensify. The coming weeks will be critical for determining whether XRP can stabilize or face further declines. The combination of whale offloading and technical indicators suggest that XRP’s price is at a crossroads. Traders and investors alike are waiting for clear signals to determine if the XRP will bounce back or continue its downward trajectory. Also Read: Metaplanet’s Bold Move: $15M U.S. Subsidiary to Supercharge Bitcoin Strategy The post Whales Dump 200 Million XRP in Just 2 Weeks – Is XRP’s Price on the Verge of Collapse? appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/17 23:42